- Joined
- May 28, 2017
All of them before Rome. The entire middle east still.
So, nothing at all to do with the modern west at all?
kthxbye
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All of them before Rome. The entire middle east still.
I just said that it happened, retard. You people can't read. Hell, there's a longpost by a user who clarified for me, even.So, nothing at all to do with the modern west at all?
kthxbye
The balance of power was never equal in the genders. They simply were at equilibrium, now that the new "normal"(online dating, etc) has not yet been properly settled down, you will have dissents simply because there is not a consistent understanding of where this balance is.I should clarify it isn't a major tilt, but the fact of the matter is that men are still expected to retain the positive qualities of their masculinity while getting rid of their negative ones. Men and women have achieved effective parity in terms of pay, but a lot of women still expect the man to bear the financial burden of the relationship.
Not trying to be offensive, but I'm well aware of everything you meant.I should clarify it isn't a major tilt, but the fact of the matter is that men are still expected to retain the positive qualities of their masculinity while getting rid of their negative ones. Men and women have achieved effective parity in terms of pay, but a lot of women still expect the man to bear the financial burden of the relationship. Shouldn't these kinds of expectations die off in a society where men and women are equal? Why is it that we elevate femininity and pick and choose the bits we like of masculinity and discard everything else as toxic?
[...]
I don't see why this line of thinking is absurd. It applies on a fundamental, natural level. Males in most species have to compete with other males to earn the right to mate with a female. Humans are animals too, and much of our core animal programming hasn't changed, its just adapted to civilized life.
I think perhaps you're misconstruing what I'm saying, I'm talking in a utilitarian sense.If we were to actually tally it all up, I don't think your argument works, either. Our primitive male monkey brains place far too much value on a woman's physical traits. A lot of it comes down to genetics, some of it is work. A woman's value derives from her genetics much more so than a man's. It's not like we chose who we were born to. Is this something we should just ignore in the day in age when everyone is obsessed with talking about oppression and social justice? Where's the social justice in that?
That's absurd. You niggers have some twisted ass brains, dude.Pretty sure people would give a guy a lot of shit if he's not trying imho.
I agree, and I think I mentioned this in my earlier post. I think that post the CRA of 1964 was the point in time when that equilibrium was optimal. We are now at a point of disequilibrium where if we aggregate all the properties of the dating market, women have far more of un upper hand overall then they had before.The balance of power was never equal in the genders. They simply were at equilibrium, now that the new "normal"(online dating, etc) has not yet been properly settled down, you will have dissents simply because there is not a consistent understanding of where this balance is.
It will take time for this disruption to equalize.
How old are you? I promise its pertinent.Ok, let's say right now, for everyone in this thread: so I'm sitting here in boxers and an undershirt and a cute girl appears in my house and says "Hi are you single?". What then? Tell me in objective, not vague, terms how this will play out and what anyone in this thread plans to do with this girl if she agrees to date you. What part of your monkey brain are you satisfying?
The woman's role that you're describing is fine. What is not fine is that women's standards on average have outpaced reality and an entire dating market of coombrains have matched this delusion. Look at the amount of coombrain retards who buy OF subscriptions.As such, why would someone be frustrated that it's "easier" when what they're seeking, the emotions involved, and the significance of it, are two completely different things?
They can sense your thirst, women run when they think men are desperate. It's evolutionary; the most fucked up dudes are the most desperate ones, the most desperate ones are the ones who are going to skin her alive if she's willing to trust them. The mothers of the trusting girls who would not have blocked your creepy incel butt got murdered by Bundy in '75 because they were willing to help a stranger load deck furniture into a windowless van. Simple natural selection at work.@gang weeder I don't talk politics with women generally. I try to get a rapport going and get to know them but usually end up blocked sooner or later, even if I thought things were going alright.
Case in point lmaoNigger there are no women to date where I live. You think I'd willingly subject myself to this shit if that were the case?
There's a much less tortured reason women reproduce more often than men; they have to put in way more energy/time/opportunity cost to have them. Once a man knocks some bitch up he can just move on to another, but that girl's stuck with the risk of the pregnancy. This is why women are commodities, at least in the evo psych sense. A woman who isn't back-to-back pregnant is an underutilized resource for the tribe, some incel loafing around the cave is just a useless mouth.This is both true and it isn't. Incels are actually pretty common in human societies, or at least not uncommon:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/through-history-more-women-have-reproduced-men-180952840/
The reasons for this are well known and incels are largely correct about them i.e. women are hypergamous, and it's easy for one high status man to occupy multiple women while the opposite is basically unheard of. Modern dating culture facilitates this by giving women infinite options and teaching them to de-value family/having kids, so many of them feel little incentive to settle before hitting the wall, and some won't settle even then and will turn into cat ladies or whatever. Feminism has undeniably made dating much more difficult for the average man.
This sounds exhausting. This also reminds me I need to upgrade my porn hard drive.I agree, and I think I mentioned this in my earlier post. I think that post the CRA of 1964 was the point in time when that equilibrium was optimal. We are now at a point of disequilibrium where if we aggregate all the properties of the dating market, women have far more of un upper hand overall then they had before.
There is no denying that women have always been the gatekeepers of relationships and sex, and that's ok and normal. Nobody should be getting surprised or pissy about this. The issue I see personally is that more and more women are selecting against their own long-term interests and fucking up the situation for a lot of people in the process.
This disruption will probably resolve itself, but it takes time, as you said. I'm curious how long it'll take and how that's going to reflect on the population of both men and women though.
How old are you? I promise its pertinent.
I'll bite, but let's use a different scenario, because the one you posed is pretty weird to respond to.
You go on a date with a woman. It's going well, but she says something you disagree with. You have the choice of saying something about it or keeping quiet to not stir the pot.
The way I see it, if you refuse to engage, you're being a coward. You don't want to stir the pot because you want the evening to end as ideally as possible.
Engaging respectfully is the masculine thing to do.
We live in a very polarizing time in general, but it's especially relevant when it comes to dating. Disagreeing with a woman on certain things is a great way to ensure there isn't a second date. Certain things that were fine in the social
Dating and relationships aren't about sex, by the way. I don't think men should talk to women just because they want sex. Sex happens when both parties want it to happen, and going in with only a sexual motivation into a date with a woman is an example of being a monkeybrain.
Being a monkeybrain leads a man to consider nothing other than the looks of a woman and only being interested in sex. Many women with nothing to offer but their looks then begin to overvalue themselves both on the dating market and off it.
The woman's role that you're describing is fine. What is not fine is that women's standards on average have outpaced reality and an entire dating market of coombrains have matched this delusion. Look at the amount of coombrain retards who buy OF subscriptions.
I don't generally like MRA/manosphere types, but I think some of the content they put out about dating is a good example of what I'm talking about.
I agree, and I think I mentioned this in my earlier post. I think that post the CRA of 1964 was the point in time when that equilibrium was optimal. We are now at a point of disequilibrium where if we aggregate all the properties of the dating market, women have far more of un upper hand overall then they had before.
There is no denying that women have always been the gatekeepers of relationships and sex, and that's ok and normal. Nobody should be getting surprised or pissy about this. The issue I see personally is that more and more women are selecting against their own long-term interests and fucking up the situation for a lot of people in the process.
This disruption will probably resolve itself, but it takes time, as you said. I'm curious how long it'll take and how that's going to reflect on the population of both men and women though.
.....
The woman's role that you're describing is fine. What is not fine is that women's standards on average have outpaced reality and an entire dating market of coombrains have matched this delusion. Look at the amount of coombrain retards who buy OF subscriptions.
I don't generally like MRA/manosphere types, but I think some of the content they put out about dating is a good example of what I'm talking about.
Inceldom is virtually nonexistent in the Middle East. If you can't find a wife yourself, your family will arrange you to marry one of your cousins.All of them before Rome. The entire middle east still.
I agree with you but Jesus Christ you need to put down the thesaurus man.The one idea, adhered to by anyone, that indicates psychic solidarity with the mass of autistic and hopeless incels who stalk the backwaters of the internets darkest and most depraved swampland, hoping to cast off their own filthy souls into some unfortunate passerby, like a permanently erect, masturbating and weeping werewolf, is the insistence that one should start first with effecting change in the externalities of ones own life through personal insight brought about by anything, oh, absolutely anything, other than personal experience; economic systems, public institutions, corporate policies, laws governing sexual selection, social maxims, etc., are only to be approached in isolation and through pure deductive theory. Never through an actual encounter. Never through a submission to their conditions of entry. Too troublesome, you all say?
None of you ever seek inwardly for the parts of yourselves that could be sacrificed, so as to achieve authentic and internal change. These discussions always orbit around what you could do if only you weren't oppressed by something outside of your control. It's pure slave mentality.
What could you change, or sacrifice, about yourselves that is weak, and unsuited for success? What would you sacrifice? Will you? In my experience it is always the hermit who is all too eager to outstretch his hand to anyone he meets, and with no taste. Why else would you be here?
Verily no.I agree with you but Jesus Christ you need to put down the thesaurus man.
Both. I happen to know several incels irl and they all share three key main traits. And what is more, they are totally unwilling to change a thing about them either prefer living as they are and dreaming of some mommy gurl who will appear out of nowhere or whining about "womin bad".It’s not your looks bro it’s your repulsive ideology that’s driving the chicks off. You need therapy.
Honestly, if you're just going after an average looking girl the only one that really matters is the last one. I'm not saying every average looking girl will like you, but if you're not poorly socialized you won't have trouble finding a girl who likes you. That is as long as you're not hideously deformed and people can't smell you before you come around the corner.- Get fit, it is your responsibility to be in good phisical condition, no one will take you serioyusly with a gunt and man tiddies, theres a whole board for health and fitness go there and read some threads and engage, fitness is about knowledge as much as it is about training+nutrition
- Get a clean haircut and make it short and shave your horrible scraggly beard. it is not cool or manly it is gross. present as a respectable individual, dont project your tism onto your outward apperance
- youre probably very poorly socialised, so you need to focus on building social skills with other men before trying to attract a partner.
This is probably the most sensible advice for any unironic incel or lonley dude: get normalish hobbies and use them to meet other people and socialize with them in an environment you are comfortable in. Don't sperg out about anime or metal or some shit but if you meet a girl that way, talk about her interests and find some common ground both of you share. That can lead to deeper more meaningful conversations.Honestly, if you're just going after an average looking girl the only one that really matters is the last one. I'm not saying every average looking girl will like you, but if you're not poorly socialized you won't have trouble finding a girl who likes you. That is as long as you're not hideously deformed and people can't smell you before you come around the corner.
There are plenty of girls who like big fat hairy men, but if you can't talk about anything other than anime you're toast.
Men are more visual when it comes to mating. That's not even a meme, it's a biological fact. That's why Playboy sells loads of magazines to straight men and Playgirl is bought up by gay men, not women. I feel like a lot of people overestimate the appearance of innate looks (not appearance things a man is in control of like hygiene, fashion sense etc.) when it comes to women and think they think like men. Women know how to attract men, they don't think like them unless they are unironic thots.The ''pill'' subreddit's are hilarious. Redpill, bluepill, purplepill etc... their mental process of denial is impressive. They use every excuse in the world as to why they can't find a woman but never talk about ''their problem''. The general consensus is that there's something wrong with women these days. That is how they justify their rejection.
They never want to take a long hard look in the mirror and see their own physical flaws. Like other people have mentioned some of those flaws could be improved with visiting a gym, healthy eating, hygiene, a good hair cut, better clothes and improvement of social skills. Obviously some things like a horrible bone structure, bad features and recalcitrant Autistic traits can't be changed but there are still so many things that could be changed for the better improving the chances of getting a romantic partner.
The fact is looks count. This is just how things are. Most women know this and put effort into their appearance.