Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Chandelier said:
The Eli Erlick 'what is a woman' thread brought some interesting results. The usual claptrap from handmaidens followed, coupled with some doctors spouting bullshit. Human Gay Male provided the best milk, though.
Link / Archive
View attachment 3629256
Which is correct. Do you think people accepted this? No, they decided to fight him on it because think of the troons.
View attachment 3629257
They still underwent Mullerian development, you retard.
View attachment 3629259View attachment 3629260
He never spoke about the banks. But yes, Google is free. Maybe the retard with the Ukraine flag can look up what sex is in humans before running his mouth.
Here is a handmaiden saying that is a 'terrible definition':
View attachment 3629262
"You can't define people by this trait and then exclude them because of another trait"
Turner's Syndrome sufferers are still female because, despite having no ovaries/no eggs, they still have female reproductive parts.
View attachment 3629263
"I disagree with this because sex is just so complicated we just don't know what it is"
View attachment 3629264
Because transwomen are male, you stupid bitch.
Here is a troon saying that a gay man seems like a loser. Wait until the end.
View attachment 3629266
View attachment 3629267View attachment 3629269
Here is our sweet woman who thinks she's so beautiful:
View attachment 3629282
Here is a PhD linguist openly saying those with DSDs cannot be male or female as their genetics put them outside of it.
View attachment 3629285
There are a lot more responses, but I picked the best I found.
Click to expand...
Instead of asking "how to define woman" we should just ask "who is certainly NOT a woman" - anyone born with a penis (esp those who use / have used it to procreate) who has to rely on medical intervention to badly imitate female characteristics.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: PozzedByCoronachan, garbage cake, Helena Handbasket and 22 others
RonRiot said:
They always pull out these arguments about “cis women” who can’t give birth, or intersex people, but they are not either of those things. They are perfectly physically normal men, apart from being insane and very annoying. What point do they think it proves? Anyone can see they are men. We don’t need to know their chromosomes, but even if we did, they’d be men. It’s like saying you’re a real gorilla because orangutans exist, so human is a spectrum. How do we define human anyway? (a: not troons)
And if they’re right and neither exist, they’re exactly the same as everyone else in the world and can never be clocked or persecuted.
Click to expand...
Its a logical phalacy, if one or two exception aren't incluided on your general discription thats means that you are wrong, basically this its very pendant and give a big "wel ACTUALLY!" energy, its makes them look ( at least in their head ) cleaver. Plus the left is full of so called intellectuals that like to question the most basic stuff and say that everything is a social construct.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Helena Handbasket, Howslans, blue gopher snakes and 5 others
tran.jpg

 
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: PozzedByCoronachan, garbage cake, Helena Handbasket and 36 others
I’m sorry but it is okay to create a definition of “female” or “woman” that does not include intersex people. An individual with a vulva with internal testes is not the same as a woman, and an individual with a micro penis but partially developed female reproductive organs isn’t a woman, either. Exulansic got excoriated for this, but it is true. We can’t discard 49.9% of the population to include 0.03% of the population.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: stupid frog, Dr. Butt, PozzedByCoronachan and 23 others
Surfherder said:
I’m sorry but it is okay to create a definition of “female” or “woman” that does not include intersex people. An individual with a vulva with internal testes is not the same as a woman, and an individual with a micro penis but partially developed female reproductive organs isn’t a woman, either. Exulansic got excoriated for this, but it is true. We can’t discard 49.9% of the population to include 0.03% of the population.
Click to expand...
Intersex people are just natures fuck ups. Just like crips. We should just ignore them in conversations about how humans are actually supposed to be made.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: stupid frog, PozzedByCoronachan, PBR Streetgang and 25 others
veri said:
trannies always act so confused as to why only “chasers” are interested in them. it’s cause usually if you live a 24/7 fetishistic lifestyle you’ll repel normal people and only attract those with your same fetish. that’s why they all date eachother.
Click to expand...
They often also assume that any "cissie" who acts interested in them is a chaser. I've seen it several times ITT: man messages them on tinder or whatever, tranny reveals he's a tranny, man says it doesn't bother him - TWAW, etc, tranny freaks out; calls him a chaser; blocks him, tranny then whines on reddit about how all men are chasers.

I'm pretty sure at this point they are looking for reasons to be offended and REEEEEEEEEEEE.If the man they're flirting with is horrified about the tranny; they win bc bigot REEEEEEEEEEEE! If the man is accepting of a tranny; they win because chaser REEEEEEEEEEEE! Not even fat wimmins are so ~persecuted~ in their own words.

The only way to win is not to play. True in Wargames and with trannies.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: PozzedByCoronachan, Helena Handbasket, Struggle Cakes and 19 others
Reign Deer said:
Intersex people are just natures fuck ups. Just like crips. We should just ignore them in conversations about how humans are actually supposed to be made.
Click to expand...
These conversations get autistic real fast, that’s for sure.

Yeah, intersex people exist.

And there are some birth defects where a person is born with six fingers or no fingers at all.

But nobody would ever pretend that there’s some huge dictionary controversy regarding how many digits on how many hands humans have.

It’s just trannies playing dumb word games.

“Hurr durr! What about INTERSEX people?! Got you shitlord! Nobody knows what a woman is!”
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: stupid frog, PozzedByCoronachan, Helena Handbasket and 33 others
AssignedEva said:
Yeah, I'll give you my tits if you give me your broad shoulders!
Click to expand...
it’d be so funny to make a fake [male] twitter account and just reply to [women’s] posts with things along the line of “i’ll give you my tits if you give me that jawline!”.

you can’t really get banned for it on somewhere like twitter, but not as likely to succeed on reddit.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Helena Handbasket, GenitalFetishist, Average Pepsi Enjoyer and 4 others
veri said:
it’d be so funny to make a fake [male] twitter account and just reply to [women’s] posts with things along the line of “i’ll give you my tits if you give me that jawline!”.

you can’t really get banned for it on somewhere like twitter, but not as likely to succeed on reddit.
Click to expand...
In before a tyranny claims that your “gimme that jawline” is a threat.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Helena Handbasket, Rampant Rat, GenitalFetishist and 2 others
Chandelier said:
The Eli Erlick 'what is a woman' thread brought some interesting results. The usual claptrap from handmaidens followed, coupled with some doctors spouting bullshit. Human Gay Male provided the best milk, though.
Link / Archive
View attachment 3629256
Click to expand...
Sounds similar to the definition I posted in this thread few days ago.
Chandelier said:
Here is our sweet woman who thinks she's so beautiful:
View attachment 3629282
Click to expand...
I bet her gametes are small.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Helena Handbasket, Risky Horse Business, Rampant Rat and 17 others
Has anyone else noticed an increase in use of the term "human milk" as opposed to breast milk recently? And I mean outside of tranny space. I've seen it a few times, and it's not like it's inaccurate, but I can't kept help but think it's because FTMs get their panties into a twist about breastfeeding terminology. Why the word breast is triggering but an infant chomping on your tit isn't eludes me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Lunacy
Reactions: PozzedByCoronachan, Helena Handbasket, Lil Miku and 22 others
MushroomLandTV said:
View attachment 3630023
...WHY BE TRANS THEN?​
Click to expand...
Haha fuck I thought I was reading a feminist post
fenny said:
Has anyone else noticed a increase in use of the term "human milk" as opposed to breast milk recently? And I mean outside of tranny space. I've seen it a few times, and it's not like it's inaccurate, but I can't kept help but think it's because MTFs get their panties into a twist about breastfeeding terminology. Why the word breast is triggering but an infant chomping on your tit isn't eludes me.
Click to expand...
haha not even female or woman milk. I hope human milk isn’t mixed up with cow or sow milk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pickerd
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back