M
MOTHER3EARTHBOUND2GUEST
Guest
kiwifarms.net
The freedom of speech is the most important right a man can have. Bestowed and guaranteed upon to us in the First Amendment of the United States Bill of Rights, the freedom to say whatever we please will forever be a right, not a privilege, held by the noble White Man only. Someone can have a differing opinion from me and will not be jailed. Upstanding White men can call degenerate humans niggers and will not be prosecuted. It is this right that keeps the beautiful website kiwifarms.net open, even though it is classified as an “autistic hate site”. But this is perfectly legal, as there is no law against hating retards, and I hate retards just as much as all of you do. The problem is that I was recently perma-banned from the kiwifarms.net website. This ban is unjust and a form of censorship. I will prove to you that I did not break any rules of the site and am only banned because some moderators are a lot butthurt. The rules are cited from https://kiwifarms.net/help/terms.
I. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory.
I did not submit any defamatory content to the website. All of the content was the clear truth and nothing but. While some claims may be decided as defamatory, this is not true and none of my claims were libelous. In the SarevolNahtanoj thread (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/sarevolnahtanoj.17084/), I claimed that the subject of the post, Jonathan Loveras, was an “autistic furry pedophile”. I can prove all three of these statements.
In the April 1, 2009 edition of the Connecticut Post, a picture (http://connpost.mycapture.com/mycapture/enlarge.asp?image=23106155&event=722830&CategoryID=4752) was published with the following caption, “Fourteen-year-old Jonathan Loveras, who is autistic, and his seven-year-old sister Laura Soto dance together Wednesday night at Thomas Hooker School as part of the Stepping Out program for children with autism and their families, sponsored by The Kennedy Center.” A reliable daily newspaper published by the Hearst Corporation, this publication can be trusted enough to provide information on an autistic degenerate.
The Urban Dictionary (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=furry) defines a furry as a person who is “fascinated by anthropomorphic characters and animals”. According to Loveras’s DeviantArt gallery (http://s4r3v0l9tn9ty4.deviantart.com/gallery/45553372/HTF-Stuff), he has an entire “folder” dedicated to fan-art of the animated web series “Happy Tree Friends”, a show who’s cast consists of mainly anthropomorphic animals. With his gallery consisting of over 170 “Happy Tree Friends” artwork, Loveras has shown this is more than a mild obsession, and that he is, in fact, a furry.
Loveras has stated he is 21 years old (http://s4r3v0l9tn9ty4.deviantart.com/journal/21-years-old-542786998) but has been in very sexual roleplays with children almost half his age. Da proof is right here. (http://comments.deviantart.com/1/558099509/3934085614 http://comments.deviantart.com/1/558099509/3933654832) These very damning peaces of evidence CONFIRM that Jonathan Loveras is indeed, an “autistic furry pedophile” as I originally claimed.
II. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is abusive.
I have never submitted or linked any abusive behaviours. According to a Merriam-Webster (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/abusive), abusive is defined using “using or involving physical violence or emotional cruelty”. The first definition is moot because you cannot physically harm people using the Internet. The second definition involving “emotional cruelty” is a bit more confusing, because no one person can clearly define it. However, I was never emotionally cruel during my time on kiwifarms.net.
You see, to be extremely cruel, I needed to patrol the site all of the time, in order to attack the autistic people constantly. But I did not do this. As log-in activities show, I was only on about once a day and not for very long. You see, I am a co-manager for a quick-service restaurant franchise, so I have no time to waste on kiwifarms.net all hours of the day. If I truly were abusive, it would be to my employees, who constantly fuck up in front and behind of the counter. I forgive them though, because they are all noble White People, and deserve the same treetment as other noble Whites and Muslims would.
In addition, I do not specifically hate one group. I hate retards, niggers, asians, furries, and pedofiles. I have no time to be “emotionally cruel” toward all five of these groups. On the other hand, other users are emotionally abusive to one group only. kiwifarms.net user Hat (https://kiwifarms.net/members/hat.2930/) is very hateful to transsexuals. 90% of their content is posted in the “Tumblr (◡‿◡✿)” subforum (https://kiwifarms.net/forums/tumblr-◡‿◡✿.54/) and is almost always insulting and misgendering transgender people, such as in their user title and in almost all of their posts in the “Assigned Male Thread II” thread (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/assigned-male-thread-ii.17137/). If I am going to be banned, than Hat should be banned as well.
III. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is hateful.
It’s not hateful if it is true.
IV. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is threatening.
I did not threaten any users at ANY time. At no point did I tell anyone I was going to hurt, kill, damage, rape, or destroy any user. My content log PROVES this.
V. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is spam or spam-like.
Spam is a terrible aquiescion onto an forum. Spam is ruddled with advertisers and nigger toothbrush salesman. At no point did I SPAM. In fact, none of my posts were spam-like in the least.
In the SarevolNahtanoj thread (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/sarevolnahtanoj.17084/), I made some posts that might have been considered spam by some faggot moderator. However this is simply non-true.
In thread posts #48, #61, and #66, I posted the same link several times and some verses from the King James Bible. But these posts were not to spam, but to merely inform y’all about the awareness of the material. I find it important to let you all know that there are pictures of dead nigger children on the internet and the Christian punishments for sin. These posts are simply for informational intent, and if you disagree then you can go fuck yourself with a bloody tampon.
VI. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is likely to offend.
This rule is some wicked horshit. “Likely to offend” does not mean a damn thing with the constant “PC” culture we live in today, getting triggered by every little thing. My employees keep telling me it’s not “PC” to hate black people;; well you know what, Fuck Those Niggas!!!!
VII. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which contains adult or objectionable content.
As stated in Section V of this thesis, I did post a gory picture of a dead nigger child (http://imgur.com/r/Gore/J1kLDfS), but I feel this is not too objectionable, as in the History textbook America; History of our Nations, whos target audience is White Schoolchildren, there is a dead picture of the convicted nigger rapist emmitt till in brutall detail. Here it is: https://sneed-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/55/26/ae/5526aeed8252f39abb7b4d25af02ef88.jpg
On the subject of adult content, I assume this is referring to pornographic content, as only 18 years olds and older can join the kiwifarms.net but there is no porn section. I did post a thread in the “Multimedia” relating to porn sites and etc., but there was no graphic content discussed or shown whatsoever (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/porn-thread.17164/). In addition, I did post a picture of pornographic actresses Vanessa Veracruz and Abigail Mac naked on a bed, kissing each other (http://www.rexmag.com/reviews/star-images/we-live-together-vanessa-veracruz.jpg), but there is no extreme pornographic content in thee foto. I even deleted it a day later. It is merely an artistic picture, existing to show the beauty of two lesbians deeply in love, touching and kissing in very intimate acts that can only be shared by two White Women. In fact, if you think this is pornographic, then you are a homophobe, and should fuck right off.
VIII. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which contains personal information of others.
I did not post personal information that was not already public. I value the security of every White Man, and I value mine as well. I was attacked at my house because a forum administrator shared my information with other people, and so I vowed to never do something as stupid as trusting people again. I have doxxed people though, including an autistic 8-year-old who really fucking deserved it.
IX. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which risks copyright infringement.
I did not distribute or post anything that could be considered a violation of U.S. Copyright Law.
X. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which encourages unlawful
activity.
I encouraged no violence or distribution of illegal material on the kiwifarms.net.
XI. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which otherwise violates any laws.
Correct, see Sections IX and X.
Well, that’s the end of this thesis. It took me about 5 days to write it. I was a little drunk during writing and I got a little lazy towards the end but I think it is good enough to be unbanned. It is exactly 1,560 words. Thank you for your time.
I. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory.
I did not submit any defamatory content to the website. All of the content was the clear truth and nothing but. While some claims may be decided as defamatory, this is not true and none of my claims were libelous. In the SarevolNahtanoj thread (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/sarevolnahtanoj.17084/), I claimed that the subject of the post, Jonathan Loveras, was an “autistic furry pedophile”. I can prove all three of these statements.
In the April 1, 2009 edition of the Connecticut Post, a picture (http://connpost.mycapture.com/mycapture/enlarge.asp?image=23106155&event=722830&CategoryID=4752) was published with the following caption, “Fourteen-year-old Jonathan Loveras, who is autistic, and his seven-year-old sister Laura Soto dance together Wednesday night at Thomas Hooker School as part of the Stepping Out program for children with autism and their families, sponsored by The Kennedy Center.” A reliable daily newspaper published by the Hearst Corporation, this publication can be trusted enough to provide information on an autistic degenerate.
The Urban Dictionary (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=furry) defines a furry as a person who is “fascinated by anthropomorphic characters and animals”. According to Loveras’s DeviantArt gallery (http://s4r3v0l9tn9ty4.deviantart.com/gallery/45553372/HTF-Stuff), he has an entire “folder” dedicated to fan-art of the animated web series “Happy Tree Friends”, a show who’s cast consists of mainly anthropomorphic animals. With his gallery consisting of over 170 “Happy Tree Friends” artwork, Loveras has shown this is more than a mild obsession, and that he is, in fact, a furry.
Loveras has stated he is 21 years old (http://s4r3v0l9tn9ty4.deviantart.com/journal/21-years-old-542786998) but has been in very sexual roleplays with children almost half his age. Da proof is right here. (http://comments.deviantart.com/1/558099509/3934085614 http://comments.deviantart.com/1/558099509/3933654832) These very damning peaces of evidence CONFIRM that Jonathan Loveras is indeed, an “autistic furry pedophile” as I originally claimed.
II. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is abusive.
I have never submitted or linked any abusive behaviours. According to a Merriam-Webster (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/abusive), abusive is defined using “using or involving physical violence or emotional cruelty”. The first definition is moot because you cannot physically harm people using the Internet. The second definition involving “emotional cruelty” is a bit more confusing, because no one person can clearly define it. However, I was never emotionally cruel during my time on kiwifarms.net.
You see, to be extremely cruel, I needed to patrol the site all of the time, in order to attack the autistic people constantly. But I did not do this. As log-in activities show, I was only on about once a day and not for very long. You see, I am a co-manager for a quick-service restaurant franchise, so I have no time to waste on kiwifarms.net all hours of the day. If I truly were abusive, it would be to my employees, who constantly fuck up in front and behind of the counter. I forgive them though, because they are all noble White People, and deserve the same treetment as other noble Whites and Muslims would.
In addition, I do not specifically hate one group. I hate retards, niggers, asians, furries, and pedofiles. I have no time to be “emotionally cruel” toward all five of these groups. On the other hand, other users are emotionally abusive to one group only. kiwifarms.net user Hat (https://kiwifarms.net/members/hat.2930/) is very hateful to transsexuals. 90% of their content is posted in the “Tumblr (◡‿◡✿)” subforum (https://kiwifarms.net/forums/tumblr-◡‿◡✿.54/) and is almost always insulting and misgendering transgender people, such as in their user title and in almost all of their posts in the “Assigned Male Thread II” thread (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/assigned-male-thread-ii.17137/). If I am going to be banned, than Hat should be banned as well.
III. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is hateful.
It’s not hateful if it is true.
IV. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is threatening.
I did not threaten any users at ANY time. At no point did I tell anyone I was going to hurt, kill, damage, rape, or destroy any user. My content log PROVES this.
V. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is spam or spam-like.
Spam is a terrible aquiescion onto an forum. Spam is ruddled with advertisers and nigger toothbrush salesman. At no point did I SPAM. In fact, none of my posts were spam-like in the least.
In the SarevolNahtanoj thread (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/sarevolnahtanoj.17084/), I made some posts that might have been considered spam by some faggot moderator. However this is simply non-true.
In thread posts #48, #61, and #66, I posted the same link several times and some verses from the King James Bible. But these posts were not to spam, but to merely inform y’all about the awareness of the material. I find it important to let you all know that there are pictures of dead nigger children on the internet and the Christian punishments for sin. These posts are simply for informational intent, and if you disagree then you can go fuck yourself with a bloody tampon.
VI. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is likely to offend.
This rule is some wicked horshit. “Likely to offend” does not mean a damn thing with the constant “PC” culture we live in today, getting triggered by every little thing. My employees keep telling me it’s not “PC” to hate black people;; well you know what, Fuck Those Niggas!!!!
VII. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which contains adult or objectionable content.
As stated in Section V of this thesis, I did post a gory picture of a dead nigger child (http://imgur.com/r/Gore/J1kLDfS), but I feel this is not too objectionable, as in the History textbook America; History of our Nations, whos target audience is White Schoolchildren, there is a dead picture of the convicted nigger rapist emmitt till in brutall detail. Here it is: https://sneed-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/55/26/ae/5526aeed8252f39abb7b4d25af02ef88.jpg
On the subject of adult content, I assume this is referring to pornographic content, as only 18 years olds and older can join the kiwifarms.net but there is no porn section. I did post a thread in the “Multimedia” relating to porn sites and etc., but there was no graphic content discussed or shown whatsoever (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/porn-thread.17164/). In addition, I did post a picture of pornographic actresses Vanessa Veracruz and Abigail Mac naked on a bed, kissing each other (http://www.rexmag.com/reviews/star-images/we-live-together-vanessa-veracruz.jpg), but there is no extreme pornographic content in thee foto. I even deleted it a day later. It is merely an artistic picture, existing to show the beauty of two lesbians deeply in love, touching and kissing in very intimate acts that can only be shared by two White Women. In fact, if you think this is pornographic, then you are a homophobe, and should fuck right off.
VIII. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which contains personal information of others.
I did not post personal information that was not already public. I value the security of every White Man, and I value mine as well. I was attacked at my house because a forum administrator shared my information with other people, and so I vowed to never do something as stupid as trusting people again. I have doxxed people though, including an autistic 8-year-old who really fucking deserved it.
IX. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which risks copyright infringement.
I did not distribute or post anything that could be considered a violation of U.S. Copyright Law.
X. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which encourages unlawful
activity.
I encouraged no violence or distribution of illegal material on the kiwifarms.net.
XI. You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which otherwise violates any laws.
Correct, see Sections IX and X.
Well, that’s the end of this thesis. It took me about 5 days to write it. I was a little drunk during writing and I got a little lazy towards the end but I think it is good enough to be unbanned. It is exactly 1,560 words. Thank you for your time.
