I love how it's Cultural Marxism that's causing this and not just Capitalism.
Last edited:
Plagued Anti-SJW / The boys who cried SJW - People who think SJWs are the next Hitler
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2016
Women don't buy comics or video games, though. So you're completely wrong. No amount of PR-based feminist retcons have made DC or Marvel higher profits.
That doesn't make the inverse true, either; it doesn't mean it's cultural Marxism either. Marxism might do lazy SJWs a favor, make them get a damn job, one they can't simply flake out of (hopefully the punishment for leaving the glorious United States Department of Liberal Arts Slave Labor and Social Gender Theory is the Alaskan gulag). If anything its a delightfully skewed American version of diluted pop-feminism/social justice in bed with benevolent Capitalism-lite. If the comics execs had their ways and not artists and marketing, it would literally be as pornographic, salacious, and violent as possible. That is because it always sells.
What a way to go. Takes good people looking the other way for shit to go south. You gotta be neutral though (even when you're dead fucking wrong). Constantly taking a third position- they're both bad zomg sexism lmao MRA rofl buzzwords- on this shit isn't correct. SJW are overwhelmingly sensitive babies who are pushing for actual censorship. They want institutions to censor things that hurt their feelings. Sure, the people criticizing them are terrible, but it doesn't mean anything. People's character has
Lots of idiots have been on the right and wrong side of history and nobody remembers all that well because to the victor goes the spoils. Imagine if we forget about all the SJW scumbags who have ruined so much joy in the world with their finger wagging and incessant nagging. It would literally be like letting the Japanese get away with all those war crimes they committed (that nobody remembers today). Terrible! All so you could have a Playstation with the newest Jak and Daxter sequel, Uncharted 4.
Rolling over and letting these scum bags do what they please seems kind of like a willing cuckhold type of behavior. Though I guess that's common on this degenerate wesbite, where you've got spergs and trannies just shy of being lolcows and indeed some of them simply are lolcows as well posting out the ass their soapboxy, cringeworthy opinions (fucking Nintenyearolds). Where's that good old liberalism when they're hiding from criticism and blocking your rude messages of scat porn and fake nudes of Jeff Foxworthy while they sperg out against people who are their mirror image? If you are liberal why don't you believe in freedom?
Who doesn't love a good wank, wanker? When were games and comics anything but self indulgent fantasies for losers and underdogs, made for the entire purpose of gratifying the ego and making life a little less than a massive shit stain we know it truly is? I tell you, never. Stop being so serious; you're honestly repressed if wanking bothers you. You're probably a Communist, too.
That doesn't make the inverse true, either; it doesn't mean it's cultural Marxism either. Marxism might do lazy SJWs a favor, make them get a damn job, one they can't simply flake out of (hopefully the punishment for leaving the glorious United States Department of Liberal Arts Slave Labor and Social Gender Theory is the Alaskan gulag). If anything its a delightfully skewed American version of diluted pop-feminism/social justice in bed with benevolent Capitalism-lite. If the comics execs had their ways and not artists and marketing, it would literally be as pornographic, salacious, and violent as possible. That is because it always sells.
What a way to go. Takes good people looking the other way for shit to go south. You gotta be neutral though (even when you're dead fucking wrong). Constantly taking a third position- they're both bad zomg sexism lmao MRA rofl buzzwords- on this shit isn't correct. SJW are overwhelmingly sensitive babies who are pushing for actual censorship. They want institutions to censor things that hurt their feelings. Sure, the people criticizing them are terrible, but it doesn't mean anything. People's character has
absolutely nothing to do with the content of their arguments.
Rolling over and letting these scum bags do what they please seems kind of like a willing cuckhold type of behavior. Though I guess that's common on this degenerate wesbite, where you've got spergs and trannies just shy of being lolcows and indeed some of them simply are lolcows as well posting out the ass their soapboxy, cringeworthy opinions (fucking Nintenyearolds). Where's that good old liberalism when they're hiding from criticism and blocking your rude messages of scat porn and fake nudes of Jeff Foxworthy while they sperg out against people who are their mirror image? If you are liberal why don't you believe in freedom?
Who doesn't love a good wank, wanker? When were games and comics anything but self indulgent fantasies for losers and underdogs, made for the entire purpose of gratifying the ego and making life a little less than a massive shit stain we know it truly is? I tell you, never. Stop being so serious; you're honestly repressed if wanking bothers you. You're probably a Communist, too.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
Pretty sure it wasn't "artists and marketing" types responsible for the Comics Code of the mid-century.
J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
lol what the fuck are you bathering about?
FlamingPie
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2015
Well, that explains the red pill portion of the anti-SJW moment who sperg about how they're dropping out of society while watching said society crumble Atlas Shrugged style.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
I'm not reading all that shit, sperg. Shorten it.
Sheikh_Speare
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2015
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
>not having real nudes of Jeff Foxworthy
filthy casual
You mean there isn't a little animal called a cuck and a cuck holder isn't someone who holds a cuck?
Someone lied to me.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2014
I love how people (particularly in alt-right, especially an-caps) like to blame the dreaded C and M for everything wrong with the West, yet seem to forget that capitalism has done more to sell hedonism in their eyes (see porn industry)
- Joined
- May 30, 2014
So are you like, actually retarded, or just pretending? Because that is way too long a text wall for just shitposting.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2016
Sorry, the real ones are for me and me alone. PM me, bro, I'll get you the good stuff.
C'mon, really? Did you read what I wrote and disagree or are you just illiterate, dude? Give me some credit here. Get outta here with that. Or... don't just stand there, come on in. Whatever. Look... you guys are completely off-topic, look at the gaggle of others saying the same thing with no response other than saying I have aspergers (which is ironic).
Why in private? Are you some kind of Anime Degeneracy Police? What's wrong with being public about being a sperg? Everyone here is 100% open about it. Maybe even 110 or 120% open about it. Pretty open about the whole "reading is for queers" and "what the fuck are books and what is knowledge" crowd at least.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2015
Dude, word of advice. Stop now before you powerlevel about disliking something. It's happened to all of us, but as the god of fire Smokey the Bear once said "Only you can prevent forest fires".
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
We all have our guilty pleasures.
This is kinda funny coming from someone whose view of history doesn't go back much farther than the screencap of some Tumblrtard he took 5 minutes ago. If you're going to moan about SJWs censoring things, you might do well to remember who was behind more than a few of the moral crusades throughout the past, especially during the Cold War. Hint: It wasn't fat transsexuals with weird hair colors. In fact, those were precisely the kind of people labeled "subversives" during the Red Scare and other periods of repression. I'd recommend David K. Johnson's The Lavender Scare if I was more confident in your literacy.
Granted, you could claim the shoe is now on the other foot and the fat deviants are in charge, but surprise surprise, this is the age of the Internet. At a time where you can get a de-censor patch for a videogame for free, or read a mammoth variety of webcomics if you don't like the SJWs at Marvel, calling Anita Sarkeesian the second coming of the NKVD is just retarded.
J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2015
Does this guy really think that cynical marketing gimmicks (female Thor and the like) that are blatantly just made to appeal to the rising SJW demographic is some sort of sinister communist agenda? Not a fan of Marvel's thinly veiled attempts to seem relevant and progressive, but that's next level autism.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2016
Oh boy, y'know... It's really easy to see how gullible, insecure people are by posting something fucking hilariously obtuse in intent and see who comes out of the woodwork.
You'll find I can and do shitpost long diatribes, but that it is indistinguishable from honest and sincere proselytizing. Which is which? Did he put the poison in his cup or mine? Well, tricky thing is that I put poison in all the cups- or in the case of our elusive game of gay internet chicken, putting the poison in our rectums and urethras- even the ones we aren't using for this game. Wink wink big guy also hellllllooooo boys. I'd think everyone could guess if I was being humorous or would ask for clarification on what is true and what is embellished and what is outright lying. I might even be honest about it. I've never seen so many confused people say reading is for autistics or that somebody is a sperg for being able to use English in a coherent, albeit offensively obtuse, way. I'd say I'm on point, yeah? I may drone on and on, but it is purposeful.
The point of the thread is the shitheads who are the opposite shitheads to SJWs, right? So why don't you all make fifteen more off-topic posts getting mad at my ONE post which was on topic.
Like this guy lmao. Dude clam down.
You do know some of McCarthy's main compatriots were closeted homosexuals and eventually it discredited him through association? Hoover, who presided over all sorts of nasty behavior was a homosexual and crossdresser. It seems you find it irrelevant that you define "subversives" as a targeted group of homosexuals but ironically some of the major homosexuals known to history were on the side of the action that involved the subversion.
The irony of what you're saying is that it no less reduces the same tactics on the side of SJWs. Just because one side is wrong doesn't absolve the other side of the same shit. They fear monger just as much as their opposition. This is like absolving the crimes of the Bolsheviks in the revolution or the NKVD during and after WWII as nothing simply because Americans murdered all the American native indians. One side being wrong doesn't make the other correct. Neither are correct. The conclusion does not follow thew premise. It's non-sequitur. Your mention of one authoritarian trespass doesn't exempt leftists from doing the same thing and doesn't unmake all the left wing authoritarian censorship that has already occurred in every failed socialist totalitarian police state throughout modern times.
The other side of it is that you want to ignore leftist garbage behavior and point out only the reactionary kind. I guess it's not murder if a leftist does it, right? Then again you could always keep pulling more "No True Scotsmen" fallacies out by constantly moving the goalposts of what social justice entails, treating all the leftist genocides as the work of centrists, opportunists, or fascists in the guise of "communism" or "socialism." The Soviets did many great things; they educated peasants and made education available in an egalitarian anti-sexist way. That doesn't mean they were angels. Being anti-sexist doesn't mean you can't just oppress people on another social vector. You're foolish to simply play along. That's why I have uttered they power word, naming thee, "cuck." Sorry for spelling it wrong before, "cuckold." I don't know much about the "enlightened man's" fetish (I'm just ignorant of the whole affair).
I don't care about de-censor patches or comics in relation to feminism; that isn't institutional power on the feminists part, just lazy and hackneyed appeasement and self-censorship. Brow-beating is where the meat and potatoes of the bullshit is. I didn't call Sarkeesian anything similar to actual secret police, you're just saying stupid stuff now as an ad hominem attack. I have nothing personal against you or any leftists (I am a far leftist myself). I would say that if I thought she was competent or talented in torturing people she'd make a wonderful (sexy) torturess (Jewess); she most certainly is torture to listen to, but only in a strictly hyperbolic sense.
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2014
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
I'm a little reminded of how I've seen more than a few anti-SJWs rant about gays while praising "based milo."
No one's arguing it does. We have several threads dedicated to making fun of tumblr and SJWs. It's just that the claims of their opponents that they're some terrible authoritarian force are as amusingly stupid as their own claims that white males are the root of all the world's evil.
If only I could rate a post "horrifying" and "deviant" at the same time.