Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

Big brained thoughts on street takeovers, perhaps the most egregious example of personal transportation being used as a weapon against society, from this big dumb cunt.

1661953275716.png
I'll never understand car haters who are also cop haters. Who the fuck else enforces traffic laws and pulls over unsafe drivers? Who else is going to take care of the melanin enriched that will inevitably shit up your walkable city? You think for how much they invoke the 30,000 they would realize the number of people killed by cops per year (even wrongfully) is at most in the double digits.
 
Big brained thoughts on street takeovers, perhaps the most egregious example of personal transportation being used as a weapon against society, from this big dumb cunt.

View attachment 3661110

View attachment 3661109

He probably didn't know that a cultural enrichment unit had been removed from the simulation (shot by a fellow melanoid who was shooting at a white boomer in a van who was trying to get out of the stopped traffic) :deviant:

View attachment 3661128

Amazing how these animals become paragons of virtue in death:

View attachment 3661135

Links
https://twitter.com/JamiSeymore/status/1564448974748393472
https://twitter.com/FredTheFriendly

Surprise cat tax - based little dude: fuck you and your dog.
View attachment 3661140
This is exactly what I knew would happen. One of them ended up getting killed in the urban area they love so much.
 
Imagine driving to work and some retard in front of you inconveniences everyone by going 8mph with an 18' kayak. Every city has this guy that everyone knows because people talk about what a fag he is every time he rides by.
That is being a typical car-brain.

You think he cares he a fag?

He wants to inconvenience you because he hates you. He wants to make driving from the suburbs and into the city as difficult and annoying as possible to try to make you move into the city and get a bike like him.

Terry A. Davis would know what to do.
 
You know what’s really ironic? Downtown Houston, despite being the arch example for car dependent urban planning actually meets a lot of their criteria. The center of downtown is a collection of businesses and housing buildings connected by underground walking tunnels with restaurants and shops. You can get just about anything you want in under 15 minutes of walking. You can stay cool while doing it too.

The problem is that the city grew so fast over various parts of its history that the government just gave up expanding this, because you can’t build underground tunnels for 2-4 million people in a city built on a marsh. Especially when 100k new Californians and Mexicans move in every year.

Population growth proved the idea of carless planning unsustainable.

Funny you mention Houston. They often bring up pictures of how much of the south part of the city is mostly parking lots. First, most of the downtown is vacant for some giant pie-in-the-sky development that never happened (Houston Center, which was supposed to be some city-within-a-city with monorails and skywalks and an array of buildings....and secondly, the picture is woefully out of date. A park in south downtown, Discovery Green, has expanded with additional features and conversion of a street to a pedestrian promenade, a new hotel has been built and connected to the exposition center, and several apartment buildings have been built near Minute Maid Park. And all of this has happened since 2008, much less the 1980s/early 1990s or whenever they like to trade the picture.
 
Do they seriously think that they invented that just because they use it a lot?

"NIMBY" was created in the early '70s as an acronym for "Not In My Back Yard!".

It's first use was in a protest against a proposed nuclear power station in California by a bunch of hippies/former hippies who had a commune in the area. (The power station got cancelled, but not because of the hippies, because CA got a new governor who vetoed it).

The pejorative form was always "NIMBYism", not calling people NIMBYs. Maybe that is original to r/fuckcars.

Also lol that even the subreddit considers "orangepilled" cringe. Just take the L, NJB.

In an earlier post(on the variety of Matrix-themed "pills") I said trannies use "purple pill". That is incorrect.

Trannies use "pink pill" - for evidence see Keffals' Twitter feed.
Them using NIMBY as a slur is disturbing and extremely telling of these people's true authoritarian intentions. Why yes, I do care about what happens in my neighborhood more than the neighborhoods surrounding me. Why yes, I will object to you shoving crap into my backyard that I don't want. Do I not have the right to advocate for my own interests above someone else's? There is a big difference between someone that won't take your rights away out of a moral center, and someone that won't do it merely because they lack the means to do so. I know accusing lefties of being commies is almost a bad cliche at this point, but their obsession with putting the collective above the individual's preferences pushes it into not even being a joke anymore, just an apt comparison.
 
Big brained thoughts on street takeovers, perhaps the most egregious example of personal transportation being used as a weapon against society,

What is a "street takeover"?

It sounds like blocking of streets is involved - does it involve finding a road that's hard/annoying to get around, then blocking it with tyre casings, car wrecks and other flammable shit, all of which the shitheads doing this set alight.

The perpetrators then riot around their "roadblocks" until encouraged to leave by police with tear gas and rubber bullets.

If that shit is what "Fred Baker" was tweeting in support of, fuck him.

My suggestion is that he goes to and livestreams the next one, especially the parts featuring "Fred" involved in wholesome activities such as grand larceny and arson.

If a "street takeover" is something else, my livestreaming advice stands, especially if firearms and illegal activities are involved/can be introduced.
 
No need.
As far as commies go, such irl activists are proper pussies. We haven't talked about them yet, but i think everyone kinda knows the type of person I'll try to outline, especially if you circle around college/fresh alumni circles. Loud minority leaders with 50/50 gender distribution, green party, activist turned op-ed journalist, usually in a suspiciously good financial condition, rents a flat in a city center. They may have a fake repressed proletarian twitter bio, but looking into their career, you wish you'd earn as much in a year they do in a month. Peaceful protester that somehow always gets out of trouble. Degree in something semi-useful like statistics or power distribution.

If they weren't boujie city center commuters they'd try to educate themselves on how most functional members of society get to work/shop/school/home, but they do not dare descend into the hellhole that a daily 80km commute can be. Usually they also care very much about tourism and overall vibe/look/feel of the city, but not much about the actual people that live in them. The problem that we're solving here isn't a car problem, it's a "living in the city that you're working in is getting more expensive by the day" issue, but they don't care about housing until someone is making passive income off it. It's the tonedeaf talk of a magazine journalist, the inefficient blather of an op-ed columnist, and it really shows.

I don't know if anyone has touched on this, but if you go digging far enough, you'll find a lot of hate for the ultimate utilitarian cyclist - The food delivery guy who cycles for efficiency and speed. Where I live there's started a coordinated hate campaign against people trying to make a living as couriers and delivery guys to the point that they have to wear ID plates on their thermo bags so people will have an easy way to snitch them to the police. Reasons cited were vague dataless claims of unsafe zooming through the (cyclist/pedestrian only) city center, so it looks like I might get an extended commute to the college real soon because some journofags and tourists feel insecure on their leisurely stroll through the medieval centre. The city authority is threatening making a shitload of shortcuts pedestrian only. Fuck that.

I don't see how any of these irl protester people intend to inflict real change. At least Adam and NJB spit out a semi-insightful video now and them. Honestly, compared to these rioturds and poor-larp-journos, I don't find them half bad.
 
One of them was really tilted about Egypt's new capital as it had big dictator vistas, monuments and a mass transit system designed to exclude poors. That must mean al-Sisi is a master of town planning. Well no, but they seem to have an attitude which would surely put off any who are outside the urban bugman mindset. Public transport seems to provide a home for the mentally ill and urban youths wanting to head to places where they're not wanted. Now all of that would be solved by just raising fares to keep the thrash element off the buses and revising routes.
 
Last edited:
A youtuber about 2x as big as NJB just dropped this. It is full of the typical "It is illegal to walk" and "Big auto did this" talking points while, as always, missing out on WHY people don't want public transit.
Top Comment:
1661983956436.png
Who thinks that a therapist is the most important thing to be able to walk to? Normally walkable city proponents promote being able to walk to a corner store, not the shrink. This person is likely less than 16 years old and already has such large mental issues they need a therapist; I don't think it is the cars' fault why their life sucks.

There definitely are a lot of mental cases in the comments:
1661984522625.png
1661984804127.png

1661984914927.png
1661984932870.png
1661984967664.png
 
Last edited:
Top Comment:
View attachment 3663226
Who thinks that a therapist is the most important thing to be able to walk to? Normally walkable city proponents promote being able to walk to a corner store, not the shrink. This person is likely less than 16 years old and already has such large mental issues they need a therapist; I don't think it is the cars' fault why their life sucks.

There definitely are a lot of mental cases in the comments:
View attachment 3663296
View attachment 3663322
View attachment 3663331
View attachment 3663332
View attachment 3663338
Jesus these are.... comments. What I don't get is that you have the option of living in a place with public transit. Places like NYC and Boston have daily rider rates in 30%+. Yes, moving to NYC is hard but it is easier than changing your entire town.
As for the last one, consider getting a motorcycle (yes, I am a motosperg) insurance is not that expensive. Most people pay about $120/year for minimum coverage and $400/year for full coverage. That is one of the best things about motorcycling is that the cost of operating the vehicle is very low compared to a car. It is not ideal for all climates, but if you are concerned about the cost of insurance, this is an option.
 
I've seen a lot of these people on twitter and reddit, and seeing these people get so assblasted over cars is hilarious, like do they expect trains and bikes to do everything what are bikes going to do when there's a supply shortage and trains can only go to so many places. And what they plan to do when emergency service have to wait for a train to finish moving in a certain area.
 
Jesus these are.... comments. What I don't get is that you have the option of living in a place with public transit. Places like NYC and Boston have daily rider rates in 30%+. Yes, moving to NYC is hard but it is easier than changing your entire town.
As for the last one, consider getting a motorcycle (yes, I am a motosperg) insurance is not that expensive. Most people pay about $120/year for minimum coverage and $400/year for full coverage. That is one of the best things about motorcycling is that the cost of operating the vehicle is very low compared to a car. It is not ideal for all climates, but if you are concerned about the cost of insurance, this is an option.
Because moving is too much of a hassel for these "just do better" cretins. No, humanity as a whole has to upend how it does things, and rebuild civilization in their image so they don't have to stress too much while going out to get meds.
 
View attachment 3666556

Ah yes, New York City, a well-known bastion of equality and definitely not the beating heart of the Antichrist at all. In this city you might be sitting right across from the (((banker))) that foreclosed on your house! It's just different here, y'know?
The rich in NYC are chauffeured around in limousines and helicopters. They don't ride public transit.
Ex-Mayor DeBlasio famously never used public transit except for photo ops and was chauffeured to the gym in an SUV every day.
 
Back