It's what happens when someone you try to complain to says you dont sound smart or professional enough to be taken seriously so you go and get a thesaurus to sound more intelligent but really all you did was jam a big word into a hip hop freestyle.
It doesn't even make sense, these terms are just stupid.
Stochastic defines a process of randomness, at least in the mathematical sense. Unless you have stochastic obsessiveness and compulsions (au-tism), the two words mean the same thing.
So this is how "stochastic terrorism" is defined:
“the public demonization of a person or group resulting in the incitement of a violent act, which is statistically probable but whose specifics cannot be predicted.”
This makes absolutely zero sense. Stochastic implies a large degree of random variables working together, sort of like idiots deciding to queue up for a new product. It doesn't try to imply what is and isn't probable. There isn't a distribution for say, hateful but legal rhetoric and actual crimes.
- A leader or organization uses rhetoric in the mass media against a group of people.
- This rhetoric, while hostile or hateful, doesn’t explicitly tell someone to carry out an act of violence against that group, but a person, feeling threatened, is motivated to do so as a result.
- That individual act of political violence can’t be predicted as such, but that violence will happen is much more probable thanks to the rhetoric.
- This rhetoric is thus called stochastic terrorism because of the way it incites random violence.
This is completely retarded, whatever happened to that correlation doesn't imply causation and spurious relations talk when it comes to crime and race?
Here, let's reword it.
- A leader uses rhetoric in the mass media against a minor faction of Kiwifarms users.
- This rhetoric, while hostile or hateful, doesn’t explicitly tell someone to carry out an act of swatting against stupid congresswomen but a person, feeling threatened, is motivated to do so as a result.
- That individual act of swatting can’t be predicted as such, but that violence will happen is much more probable thanks to the rhetoric.
- This rhetoric is thus called stochastic swatting because of the way it incites random violence.
Does this not sound demented? What about mass hysteria, like that psychologist who's convinced that wind turbines are causing her nausea, and a bunch of other people followed suit after the idiot asked (ie circular logic)? Stochastic wind turbines? Stochastic migraines?
Stochastic 41% yourself.
"Ontologically evil" is an even dumber combination of words.

Good grief. This is the first search result.
So it's just being naturally evil, I guess. I hate pineapple on pizza, couldn't be because it just tastes weird, acidic, and pineapple is juicy so it turns the whole thing into a slop, my dislike of this topping must be ontological.
Using these terms just makes you look like a spaz. I guess that's better than a troon.