GoPro
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
Brooks definitely has a huge blind spot. J S Campbell got in trouble over the most milqueotast comic cover ever. Still, he is right about Frog to an extent. Especially about his lateness, artistic abilities, and over-reliance on the cult of personality.Second the thing about Cho and JSC. Mentioning them seems to support FROG's point more than Brook's. While FROG might overplay and exploit "the culture war" to some extent, I can't wrap my head around how anybody would argue there wasn't and isn't one in mainstream comics that affected things in a profound manner. And yet, FROG's critics seem to do it regularly now. It's weird.
For what it's worth, I mentioned in the Dean and Vikki cow thread that it's a bad look for "non-SJW anti-CG" (ostensibly) to platform somebody like Brooks. I agree with @5t3n0g0ph3r that it comes across as ridiculous, petty, and desperate.
Obviously, they can do whatever they want, but doing so lends further credence to my belief that that segment (which Nerdette is clearly trying to portray herself as part of now) is tracking left out of sheer frustration that FROG is still making money, and hasn't choked to death on a pie.
This is reason #456 why Keffals has to lose. Honestly, this thread is the only place I've read that will criticize FROG and CG in a manner that doesn't sound like it's coming from an unhinged blue checkmark on Twitter, and I really appreciate most of you making it that.
Big two comics has been mostly trash for a very long time. Going woke is just the new flavor of bad that the new cohort of writers, artists, and others entering the comics industry in late 2000s brought with them.No, I stopped buying much later, I just used HUSH as well known example of very good interior art.
Autistic rant follows, but I was bored and you asked.
But for stop buying, I think my story could be useful for publishers to understand.
I would say my decline started ~2012 or so, maybe later, when I slowly stopped buying anything other than Batman. But even then I started not feeling any connect to batman anymore. I got less and less emotionally invested and felt that the stories were either boring or way too over the top retarded for my taste (the whole BatmanInc and Daimen+Levitiah arc comes to mind.) I don't know it just did not gel with me. At this point I did not read things chronologically and did not buy read floppies anymore. I was only reading the trades, maybe when they came out or maybe months/years later.
Then Tom Kings wedding arc came out and I just checked out. It was a batman that just I could not recognize or handle and I said, that is it and I have not bought anything since. Much later I did read one trade in the Metal arc at a friends place and did not like it.
If I don't even like batman anymore, why bother with comics so I stopped going to comic book shops to buy trades completely, and I got new hobbies.
That is the danger to publishers. When you lose someone like me, it will be very hard to get me back. I did not stop having a hobby to spend time an money on. I switched to other hobbies. To get me back as a customer it is not enough to just bring the batman from pre-2015 back. You have to do that and you ALSO have to make it so much better that I will drop my current hobbies.
I did not stop buying comics because they became woke. Woke is easy to avoid, just don't buy those comics. I stoppe buying the comics because they started becoming boring and started feeling cheap, just more and more over the top, like if Michael Bey had started writing the scripts. And Tom King. Tom King sucks!
I do still buy FROGs books and merch and other creators on IGG but visiting a comics shop or buying mainstream? Nah. I have other hobbies now.
TL;DR Once you lose a customer it is not enough to just stop doing the things that drove them away if you want bring them back. You also have to show you are better than the hobbies that replaced you.
Shadow of himself? He still uses every opportunity he can to draw buxom brunettes in suggestive poses and clothing. On the most recent cons he is literally selling his collection of Outrage! commission covers that got him in trouble.Not Frank Cho, he's a shadow of himself. Cho didn't just cuck to Greg Rucka and DC to keep that sweet Harley Coomer commission money. He then went full retard on Jim Steranko when Steranko dared to state the truth about the Wu Flu.
In case of the Rucka situation, it was Cho and Rucka butting heads. Rucka won because he has more pull at DC. The outcome was obvious since the start, and Cho made a poor decision by whining on social media about it the way he did. No company likes that.
If you are not happy about Cho's politics, they are nothing new. He was not a fan of Bush era conservatives and fundies at all. Cho always was a liberal who wants to to draw cheesecake without people trying to interfere. I do not know exactly what he said to Steranko, but Cho's parent's were sick with covid. It's tough on old folks and potentially losing parents is always scary. I would not be surprised of Cho was on edge and said what he said because of that.
Someone like Eric Powell is a real shadow of his former self. I still remember when he was trashing big two and capes on the regular. He even made a video for Creators Front for Diversity in Comics in 2011, decrying the state of comics industry. It upset quite a few people. Bunch of fanboys were angry that he trashed capes and big two. Others were triggered over a skit where the big two character is raping a comic book creator in an over the top fashion. Powell apologized, took down the video, copyright struck all reuploads, and toned down his rhetoric considerably. His comics since then lost some of their character too, but are still decent.
I really wish I had saved the video when it was still up.
Last edited: