Furry Fandom and Drama General

I found KnuddelDrachi // KaleoMeow's Flickr profile.

There he uploaded pictures of evidence on which it can be read in German that he had at least 2 house searches because of the distribution of child pronography.

flickr: ( NSFW ) https://www.flickr.com/photos/150749370@N07/ the first 3 pics
Isn't your profile suit/name one of the ones he uses to pretend to be that other guy when posting pictures like that? It's pretty shitty, he does the same to several other suiters and uses peoples art too while posting his details and cp. He used to spam lulz.net with cp and his dick all the time, too. The dude is a total creep for years now. Pretty sure he had his whole profile on steam decked out as Silberfote87 at one point, to the point it was hard to tell who was who at times.
1662239854681.png
 
When it comes to the Kiwilers people have been doing, e621 certainly isn't accepting them. But rather than saying that bases aren't allowed as per upload policy, NMNY had this to say:
View attachment 3651356
View attachment 3651326
After the Kiwilers/Null fanart were deleted, Vordhosbn (the user who uploaded the majority of them) got banned, with the custom text being "Keep your kiwifarms drama off of our page."
Screen Shot 2022-09-03 at 7.36.21 PM.png

The attached ban reason/source link leads to a Wiki page that they had created for local lolcow Lou Gagliardi.
To be completely honest I have no idea why that would even need to be made, because as far as I know Lou's commissioned art is not on e621 and he's a complete nobody.
Screen Shot 2022-09-03 at 7.37.55 PM.png
 
Btw this guy is from a polish family and looks like this. He also made some post about how his mother “literally considers gays worse than death” or some shit. There was also another post someone made refuting and how he also supported lolicon but I’m phone posting so I’ll get back on my computer to find it. View attachment 3677177
I'm not one to say these things very often, but man does he look like a faggot.
 
Furaffinity recently banned AI generated art from their website.


This does bring up an interesting discussion as to how AI will affect the furry community. 90% of furry art is just made for the purpose of getting someone off, and once an AI can create its own art faster and cheaper than all other artists, we might see a crash in that market.
 
Furaffinity recently banned AI generated art from their website.


This does bring up an interesting discussion as to how AI will affect the furry community. 90% of furry art is just made for the purpose of getting someone off, and once an AI can create its own art faster and cheaper than all other artists, we might see a crash in that market.
So... who's claiming credit for getting that rules change implemented? Someone always brags that they got FA's rules changed.

Anyway, it'll be a while yet before AI can draw all the technicolor details and retarded "hybrid" fur patterns furries love. I wouldn't count on a market crash just yet.
 
Furaffinity recently banned AI generated art from their website.


This does bring up an interesting discussion as to how AI will affect the furry community. 90% of furry art is just made for the purpose of getting someone off, and once an AI can create its own art faster and cheaper than all other artists, we might see a crash in that market.
With a bit of photoshop knowledge and a good enough generation you could pass off a whole hell of a lot of AI art as convincing enough furry art. I don't think there is any way they can enforce this.
 
With a bit of photoshop knowledge and a good enough generation you could pass off a whole hell of a lot of AI art as convincing enough furry art. I don't think there is any way they can enforce this.
Yes, realistically you can't catch it all but honestly they probably don't need to. A policy like this really is just useful for banning users that are obviously using AI because they flood the front page with a hundred detailed rendered looking pieces every day. Furries may have shit taste in art, but I can't really begrudge any community made by and for human artists wanting to gatekeep out low-effort AI spammers, as this is an issue outside of furry communities as well. TBH if you've done enough editing work and paint overs of your own on top of it to the point where there isn't any AI-like uncanny-ness left it's hardly low-effort anymore and I don't think people are really going to care about it long-term, after all, there is already plenty of art that is just paint overs of a photograph online. If they want to try and take a purist stance they're welcome to try, but use of AI is not exactly black and white, or it will increasingly not be in the future with tools that blur the line between prompt-based generators and manual drawing/painting methods.
 
Yes, realistically you can't catch it all but honestly they probably don't need to. A policy like this really is just useful for banning users that are obviously using AI because they flood the front page with a hundred detailed rendered looking pieces every day. Furries may have shit taste in art, but I can't really begrudge any community made by and for human artists wanting to gatekeep out low-effort AI spammers, as this is an issue outside of furry communities as well. TBH if you've done enough editing work and paint overs of your own on top of it to the point where there isn't any AI-like uncanny-ness left it's hardly low-effort anymore and I don't think people are really going to care about it long-term, after all, there is already plenty of art that is just paint overs of a photograph online. If they want to try and take a purist stance they're welcome to try, but use of AI is not exactly black and white, or it will increasingly not be in the future with tools that blur the line between prompt-based generators and manual drawing/painting methods.
Agreed. I think the future of (digital) art will have strong AI influence and be some combination of AI generated art combined with some kind of artist/user editing or intervention. Like maybe the AI pieces together your rendered shot and you do the drawover.
 
Agreed. I think the future of (digital) art will have strong AI influence and be some combination of AI generated art combined with some kind of artist/user editing or intervention. Like maybe the AI pieces together your rendered shot and you do the drawover.
Will it make them not be three month late on commisions, when algorythm would do 50% of work for them?
 
Anyway, it'll be a while yet before AI can draw all the technicolor details and retarded "hybrid" fur patterns furries love. I wouldn't count on a market crash just yet.
It wouldn't be too hard to create a refsheet generator but it'd be thousands of hours of work manually typing in descriptions for all the refsheets you ripped off the internet.

You need to be able to provide meaningful metadata before an AI art generator can learn anything useful from the corpus you train it on. That's what's lacking from, say, FA descriptions for a refsheet that are like "knotluvr the wolfox I loved doing this one!"
 
Will it make them not be three month late on commisions, when algorythm would do 50% of work for them?
They'll use the existence of ai as an additional reason to be lazy. People will still buy art to 'support the artists', and the artists will say they are more burnt out by ai competing with them even if it's not.
 
As per this posting on Spicy Furry Takes (archive), a furry named CBreaker9 (aka Code the Muddy Protoshark) apparently pretended to commit suicide.
spicyfurrytakes1.jpg

FcS9K92WIAEAc1R.jpg
FcS9LHZXkAAzlsb.jpg
FcS9LROXwAEEfJ8.jpg

The story is, he tried to kill himself via a self-inflicted gunshot to the chest, but was saved by his parents. There is still some buckshot in his chest next to his heart, which might kill him anyway.

The proof for this is... a photograph of a small napkin on his abdomen, held in place by a belt. People are scathingly skeptical.

His Twitter account has now been yeeted, but here's an archive, as well as an archive of the gauze photo with replies.
 
As per this posting on Spicy Furry Takes (archive), a furry named CBreaker9 (aka Code the Muddy Protoshark) apparently pretended to commit suicide.
View attachment 3688688
View attachment 3688717View attachment 3688718View attachment 3688721
The story is, he tried to kill himself via a self-inflicted gunshot to the chest, but was saved by his parents. There is still some buckshot in his chest next to his heart, which might kill him anyway.

The proof for this is... a photograph of a small napkin on his abdomen, held in place by a belt. People are scathingly skeptical.

His Twitter account has now been yeeted, but here's an archive, as well as an archive of the gauze photo with replies.
If he said he used a handgun, got actual gauze and applied it properly he might of convinced a few retards. But with a shotgun he wouldn't have much abdomen left to begin with.
 
Spotted at the latest nerd con. These are only the stickers worth taking pics of; car was covered.


View attachment 3667144View attachment 3667147View attachment 3667148View attachment 3667149
Jesus Christ, I used to be friends with a girl who did this to her mom's car and for some reason her mom was cool with it.

You know, I never seen obsessive NFL boomers or Disney adults plaster the entire rear ends of their car with an ungodly amount of bumper stickers. At worst it's maybe 5-6 stickers for fandoms or political alignments on the trunk door, not the entire goddamn car. It's always, always furries and weeaboos (and furry weeaboos) that do this and I can't understand why they think it's a good idea.
 
Last edited:
Furaffinity recently banned AI generated art from their website.


This does bring up an interesting discussion as to how AI will affect the furry community. 90% of furry art is just made for the purpose of getting someone off, and once an AI can create its own art faster and cheaper than all other artists, we might see a crash in that market.
A vision of the future...
"Why is my Big Mac covered in blue hair?!"
"WTF!!! STOP GETTING YOUR UGLY MOUTH OVER THE WHIPPED CREAM NOZZE!!!"
Is what I would say if I was fucking retarded and went to Mcdonalds or Star Fucks.
 
After seeing more and more insane people on Twitter/Reddit parrot the "it's not sexual, it's just a fandom!" line, I'd like to talk about "Furscience". Specifically, some of the hilarious findings from the furry researcher's own reports.

Looking at page 93 of FurScience! A Summary of Five Years of Research from the International Anthropomorphic Research Project we get this gem:
1663045929262.png


That's right, of men who identify as furries, almost all of them admit to watching furry porn. And a straight up majority of the artwork they view is pornographic. Can you imagine calling anything else a "fandom" with stats like this? Jesus.

On "artwork":

1663047067539.png


On fursuits:

1663047316006.png


On emotional stability:

1663047006916.png


On sexual orientation:

1663047225761.png
 
Last edited:
Back