- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
My response to this: "history is a series of lies agreed upon. I'd rather be on the Right Side of Reality"."the right side of history"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My response to this: "history is a series of lies agreed upon. I'd rather be on the Right Side of Reality"."the right side of history"
That, I can agree with.My response to this: "history is a series of lies agreed upon. I'd rather be on the Right Side of Reality".
I have no problem with people using these terms legitimately, for instance mocking or attacking someone with genuine disabilities. The problem is that a lot of terminally online retards often claim some kind of self-diagnosed mental disorder and cry "ableism" when they find something that offends their shallow sensibilities. For instance, claiming easy modes in games should be mandatory as an "accessibility feature," and arguing against it is decried as "ableist." Way to completely trample over all the paraplegics and amputees who suffer genuine strife in their day-to-day living simply because you suck at video games.Ableist and ableism. Go figure, people will treat someone who is blind or crippled differently than people who are not.
What the fuck is 'safequeer'?I got another weird one
"Polyqueer"
I mean...what's wrong with saying polyamorous? Sure it's gross and a one-way path to STDs and unwanted pregnancies if women are involved but come on now.
I think it's part of an annoying trend overall of putting "queer" at the end or beginning of everything like "genderqueer", "transqueer", "safequeer" etc.
What the fuck is 'safequeer'?