Poa.st / Chudbuds.lol General Discussion Thread - !! Poa.st and Bae.st have been compromised, all direct messages have been leaked. !!

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Relativism about pedophilia or not calling it out due to a desire not to offend is cancer and you should be taken out and shot for endorsing it.
I wish I could say something defending Poast, because I've enjoyed it a bit and Graf has been an alright kinda fella as far as I've seen from him, but there's just really no excuse for lolicon. It's borderline pedophilia, it's fucking disgusting and nobody should defend that shit under any circumstance.

I'm glad their obviously working against child porn and shit but come on, that shit is a given if you're hosting a website. You don't get a reward for following the law.
 
I think there's just a general overlap between rightoid freaks and people who want to try "alt-tech", with paedophiles who are into lolicon shit.
This is true. I was thinking about making a thread about a list of confirmed pedophiles in the sektur and it would be pretty long. I don't really know why this is, but I assume that people are edgelords and for that reason get both into the spergier kinds of right-wing politics and lolicon which in turn makes those politics inauthentic but I think we knew all these people are not developing these political views out of sincere conviction.
There's plenty of mongs there now and I haven't seen any loli/shota, aside from the screenshot from Flamenco's favourite comic which had nothing sexual in it, fortunately.
I've honestly not gone on the site because of the loli and won't until I hear that they have disavowed it and banned those degenerates.
 
Oh no poastbros its over...
1662672732692.png
 
the main question is if you consider lolicon to be pedophilia.
The main question is whether you consider pedophilia to be pedophilia?
Let me think about that a second...
Bruh.
Lolicon literally translates to Pedophile.
And images of children drawn to provoke arousal is CP, drawn photographed, it's not the medium it's the intent of the artist and the observer.
If you don't find sexualized images of children sickening theres something wrong with you, you're either a pedophile or a sociopath.
If you find that shit arousing you're a pedophile.
No ifs, no buts, no arguments.
The only people who deny that are lying to themselves.

That said, I haven't seen any lolishit in my one day on there so far, but I ignore the timeline thing so YMMV. If I start seeing that shit I'm out of there.
 
You would have a point if the administration team wasn't into lolicon, again check undu's public timeline IT IS FILLED with lolicon content.
>since he does most of the sweeping, it would make things astronomically more difficult to moderate.
Graf doesn't moderate the website anymore, in fact undu is responsible for EVERYTHING that goes on the website, graf only handles the backend stuff. A lolicon pedophile controls everything that goes on poast.
View attachment 3685725

It's also funny how he tagged josh, did josh ever take a look at that pedophile's timeline? :thinking:

That's because of the thousands of newfag active users, before that the sites timeline was more degenerate.
Gunt guarding, for free, :gunt:
 
How am I guntguarding? I posted archived links to all of my claims.
protecting the Gunt is called Gunt guarding

Ralph didnt even talk about poa.st recently until graf brought him up again.
translates to "Ralph is a good boy that dindu nuffin and graf was the one being mean, pls no bully ralph
This is the first sentence you posted.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
:gunt: :gunt: :gunt: :gunt:
 
translates to "Ralph is a good boy that dindu nuffin and graf was the one being mean, pls no bully ralph
This is the first sentence you posted.
You should be ashamed of yourself.
:gunt: :gunt: :gunt: :gunt:
Oh no, I made a mistake, Ralph said poa.st sucks and graf is a glowie for saying he can read people's DMs. Gvnt is still not wrong calling poa.st a pedophile website. Cry more.
1662675941300.png

Epic fail graf, archiving your website still works a year later https://archive.ph/VdZpR
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: pharaohwewuz
Of course the moment anything even tangentially pedo/loli related rears it's ugly, dumb head, the thread devolves into virtue signaling that "pedos bad"; we get it, you're in the 99%+ of the population who thinks pedos are bad, what a brave fucking stance you took, what an incredibly bloody hot take, you deserve a medal for sharing an opinion with literally anyone in the planet that isn't a fucking pedophile, good job.

'Nonces bad'; someone hand this man a nobel peace prize, or twenty.

Now, can I laugh at a fat tryhard retard and a canadian tryhard retard throwing non-existent legal threats at each other while draining their paypigs dry of pitybux for the legal battle that totally happen between these two uber rich successful sacks of meat?
 
@ChromaQuack, i don't know to whom your post is directed, but considering it follows mine, i will respond.

the thread is about the ragepig hollerin' about poa.st, its admins, and its mods. the admin has responded by defending his site and its policies, with threats of litigation. the policies in question were posted itt. i commented on those policies. i never even mentioned the word pedophilia.

so, in the words of the farms' most prolific user, "shut up, faggot."
 
I fail to see how on Earth did this pile of horseshit ever gain an audience to begin with!
He gets two people on and has them talk with each other.
Some of the people he managed to get on are fairly big, the sheer amount of people who passed by his show is ginormous.
A tiny amount of these people seem to enjoy the Gunt himself and they are the people that watch his show even when there are no guests.
This shows there really is an audience for everything out there.
 
Back