Inactive Alison Rapp / Maria Mint / 123grapeman - Pedo Defense Force, CP Advocate, Whore. Husband Jake Rapp found his balls and divorced her.

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

"GG have managed to persuade an anti-childmolesting organisation to take a stance against child pornography."

That danged gamergate!!!!

If there's anything in the world you could do to make me side with your opposition unquestionably, it's openly advocating child porn. This is like that South Park episode where Jimbo & Ned impersonate the KKK & convince them to start supporting their opposition to drive away real supporters.

 

[Dr. Meme]

How the heck did someone like this become PR for NINTENDO of all places??

A game company that has been known for making games that appeal to mass audiences and are pretty child friendly. It just baffles me how someone who supports child pornography ended up working as public relations for these people.

pretty child friendly

there you have it

 

[Cosmos]

The thing is, even if we did legalize child porn that was already made (and there is a truly obscene amount of already existing child porn), that doesn't excuse the fact that we're legally allowing pedophiles to jerk off to photos and videos of children being raped and abused. It's messed up no matter what way you look at it.

Also, I don't think there are any studies (for obvious reasons) that show that masturbating to child porn lessens the chances of a pedophile assaulting actual children. For all we know, it actually might increase the chances. It sort of seems like a risky gamble.

 

[Replicant Sasquatch]

Rapp thinks at its core pedophilia is just a harmless kink that occasionally leads to people doing bad things. She also believes since Japan has a history of sexualizing children its totes okay. Something about white imperialism.

Of course, justifying pedophilia just because non-whites do it is ridiculous at best and flat out dangerous at worst. But SJWs do have a tendency of excusing morally atrocious practices in the name of cultural acceptance.

 

[Jaimas]

Presented without comment:

 

[chimpburgers]

Presented without comment:

Pony avatar, that means I shouldn't even bother reading the rest to know that this person is a cuck who is wrong.

 

[Lurker]

Presented without comment:

I wasn't aware that my freedom of speech rested on the backs of children being sexually abused by pedophiles. It's good to know that Rapp is looking out for the little guy... literally.

 

[DragoonSierra]

Funny thing is, AOC reform actually is an issue worth talking about. But I have the feeling Debra Lafave's long-lost younger sister here is interested in that only so much as giving creepy old fucks license to pillage.

Even if it were lowered most pedos would just lower their standards along with it. For some of them its the fact that they are illegal that gets them going.
As for the actual argument, I suppose it comes down to at what age is a person mentally ready for sex? Some countries say 18, some say 16, and some states here say 14. And some like @James Terry Mitchell Jr will say its 9.

Companies like NoA often take a bridge-burning go-fuck-yourself attitude to nuisance suits because settling one sends the message you're an easy target for a shakedown and attracts more of them, like feeding feral cats.

One win against Universal and they get a chip on their shoulder.

I don't understand how someone can go to college and write a paper about the subject and not realize owning child porn required there to be a victim first, it'd be different if she was just for fictional stuff but she thinks it's okay to have actual child porn, it's baffling!

Listen I dont think someone should be punished for writing a stupid thesis in college. You do stupid shit in college: Having drunk sex, doing drugs, having stupid opinions that you base your thesis on. If one so chooses, anything that happens in college, should stay in college. But when you start advocating for those stupid ideas and bring them out of the college sphere thats when you deserve to be called out on them. Especially if your ideas conflict with the company youre working for.

Also of note: One of the points she makes is that the federal AoC is 13 in Japan and 18 in the US. She is technically correct on this. But the states and territories in both Japan and the US have different AoCs and the main difference is that in Japan the territories AoC is higher than the federal AoC and in some areas its 18 just like US federal law, while in the US the States have a lower AoC than the federal AoC sometimes down to 14. This results in a hodgepodge system but they mostly turn out to be similar

Im not sure how this comes into play in our system but from what I understand the feds will only go after you if you crossed state lines and the states cant come after you because the AoC is lower than 18? Maybe @AnOminous knows.

 

[Replicant Sasquatch]

Even if it were lower pedos would just lower their standards along with it. For some of them its the fact that they are illegal that gets them going.
As for the actual argument, I suppose it comes down to at what age is a person mentally ready for sex? Some countries say 18, some say 16, and some states here say 14. And some like @James Terry Mitchell Jr will say its 9.


One win against Universal and they get a chip on their shoulder.


Listen I dont think someone should be punished for writing a stupid thesis in college. You do stupid shit in college: Having drunk sex, doing drugs, having stupid opinions that you base your thesis on. If one so chooses, anything that happens in college, should stay in college. But when you start advocating for those stupid ideas and bring them out of the college sphere thats when you deserve to be called out on them. Especially if your ideas conflict with the company youre working for.

Also of note: One of the points she makes is that the federal AoC is 13 in Japan and 18 in the US. She is technically correct on this. But the states and territories in both Japan and the US have different AoCs and the main difference is that in Japan the territories AoC is higher than the federal AoC and in some areas its 18 just like US federal law, while in the US the States have a lower AoC than the federal AoC sometimes down to 14. This results in a hodgepodge system but they mostly turn out to be similar

Im not sure how this comes into play in our system but from what I understand the feds will only go after you if you crossed state lines and the states cant come after you because the AoC is lower than 18? Maybe @AnOminous knows.

The US has no federal law on AoC. However, in no state is it lower than 16.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America#United_States

Federal law enforcement usually only gets involved for things like child trafficking rings that cross multiple state lines.

The problem with lowering AoC laws is no matter what they are, people will argue they are just an arbitrary distinction. The more extreme might cite the sexual agency line.

They are also largely a non issue. A vast majority of the time, an 18 yo will not be thrown in jail for porking a 17 yo. That issue probably won't even go to court unless it involved actual sexual abuse.

Most of the time, cases where AoC comes up involve victims who are much younger than their alleged molesters. In those cases AoC should be maintained because it does protect minors from sexual abusers.

 

[Sarcastic Username]

I remember when feminists said that porn caused rape. The arguments for this were "shut up, you porn hound" or maybe "shut up, you rapist." When academia actually studied the matter, the best they found was a negative correlation. That is, access to porn probably replaces rape for some people.

So some of Rapp's points are good. (Some are really bad; never say we should be more like Japan sexually when you start talking about child porn.) But she's too young to remember those years, and apparently no trusted adult around her remembers, or the older feminists around her are too ashamed to remember when feminists did back then.

Because one of them should have taken her aside and said "you can do this fight, but not as a PR person for fucking Nintendo of America."

 

[c-no]

Presented without comment:

Because a white knight of pedophilia isn't as evil as someone concerned about a pedophile or a white knight of pedophilia being a PR person for a company that is known for being family friendly. And that damn dirty GamerGate is just trying to keep women down, totally has nothing to do with people being legit concerned about a person sympathetic to pedophila being a PR rep for a company that aims at being family friendly.

Pony avatar, that means I shouldn't even bother reading the rest to know that this person is a cuck who is wrong.

Don't forget, as @cat said about bronies, that cuck may as well be a pedo as well.

 

[CatParty]

Presented without comment:

Gamergate dindu nuffin

Don't forget, as @cat said about bronies, that cuck

All bronies are pedos

 

[Replicant Sasquatch]

I think we need to take a step back in how we perceive this. Remember, we are not an autistic third party Internal Affairs for Nintendo of America. It's their job, not ours, to determine if she should be fired. Remember, all she's done is express immoral politics. People may cite the fact she works for a children-oriented video game company as a suggestion she might be dangerous. But remember there is no evidence to suggest she is a danger to children.

We should focus on the humorous dissonance between her politics and her profession, but don't go overboard and start thinking she's just using her job as easy access to children. Rapp may defend pedophiles, but she is not one herself.

 

[AnOminous]

My favorite part about all this is that people keep saying "just read her thesis and you'll understand that she's not a pedophile!" When her thesis is the reason people think she's a pedophile.

It doesn't show that, though. By itself, it's just the kind of paper taking an edgy position on some subject that lots of students write. I've criticized the questionable debate tactics used in it, but they were certainly used well enough to justify a good grade (and this is some sort of journal of honors level undergraduate writing so it apparently qualified).

This would have been super easy to justify with an academic version of the edgelord defense, except it would be completely legit. Bla bla bla and I took an extreme position for the rhetorical challenge and so on, and plus, my position now is more nuanced. Nuance, right, that's what I'm supposed to say? Yeah, nuance and shit. Anyone still chimping about it would just look stupid and it would be a complete non-story.

However, doubling down on it and saying this undergrad paper still represents her position now and calling it "legal bullshit" for a guy to be arrested for having outright child porn practically stacked floor to ceiling when he looks like John Wayne Gacy really has not helped Ms. Rapp.

Also she cucks her husband lol.

 

[CatParty]

I think we need to take a step back in how we perceive this. Remember, we are not an autistic third party Internal Affairs for Nintendo of America. It's their job, not ours, to determine if she should be fired. Remember, all she's done is express immoral politics. People may cite the fact she works for a children-oriented video game company as a suggestion she might be dangerous. But remember there is no evidence to suggest she is a danger to children.

We should focus on the humorous dissonance between her politics and her profession, but don't go overboard and start thinking she's just using her job as easy access to children. Rapp may defend pedophiles, but she is not one herself.

This all the way. You can get outraged all you want, but it is their own issue to resolve. I think the less we discuss the actual legalities of aoc, the better. I would also shy away from secondary or tertiary people in this. Focus sole on her reactions and if they are lulzy. We're in the business of lolcows, let's lol once in a while.

 

[Stress Sigh]

This all the way. You can get outraged all you want, but it is their own issue to resolve. I think the less we discuss the actual legalities of aoc, the better. I would also shy away from secondary or tertiary people in this. Focus sole on her reactions and if they are lulzy. We're in the business of lolcows, let's lol once in a while.

Though I do miss the days when half our lolcows where just lulzy and disgusting instead of being pedos or pedo sympathizers.

 

[Replicant Sasquatch]

This all the way. You can get outraged all you want, but it is their own issue to resolve. I think the less we discuss the actual legalities of aoc, the better. I would also shy away from secondary or tertiary people in this. Focus sole on her reactions and if they are lulzy. We're in the business of lolcows, let's lol once in a while.

Outrage is never productive, especially in this case. To quote Null, "she's not Nick Bate".

Though I do feel some discussion on AoC law has merit, if only for the sake of context. Remember, defense of CP posession is only one of her two perverse arguments. The other is AoC in the States needs to be lower. She has implied (but never explicitly stated) AoC should be 13, citing Japan's AoC laws. This would of course be a huge problem, since sexual assault against children is frighteningly high in Japan and part of the reason is the enabling AoC law. Rapp thinks only about "child sexual agency" without considering how easy it will be for children and teens to be sexually victimized under such a legal change.

In short, it shows even more she's a total wackjob.

 

[CatParty]

Though I do feel some discussion on AoC law has merit,

https://kiwifarms.net/forums/deep-thoughts.14/

 

[Jaimas]

This all the way. You can get outraged all you want, but it is their own issue to resolve. I think the less we discuss the actual legalities of aoc, the better. I would also shy away from secondary or tertiary people in this. Focus sole on her reactions and if they are lulzy. We're in the business of lolcows, let's lol once in a while.

I thought that's what we were doing in mocking the people having complete sperg-outs over it.

 

[c-no]

This all the way. You can get outraged all you want, but it is their own issue to resolve. I think the less we discuss the actual legalities of aoc, the better. I would also shy away from secondary or tertiary people in this. Focus sole on her reactions and if they are lulzy. We're in the business of lolcows, let's lol once in a while.

Indeed. As @Replicant Sasquatch said, we aren't some branch of Nintendo, we are just a forum that exist to laugh at lolcows. Others such as NeoGaf and KiA can try to butt their heads in this but we are only here to focus our attention on whatever sort of chimpout Alison Rapp puts out in relation to being fired from Nintendo due to her thesis.

I thought that's what we were doing in mocking the people having complete sperg-outs over it.

Those people would most likely be mocked in other threads such as the MRA GamerGate thread or NeoGaf thread in community watch.