Keffals / Clara Sorrenti / Lucas John Roberts / Queen Clara the Fart Dominatrix / SorrentiThott - Twitter / Twitch slacktivist. Obsessed with being famous. Operator of the Catboy Ranch. Canadian T-Girl porn star and independent Fart Fetish / Findom Dominatrix. Personally sponsored sending Chinese HRT from Brazil to children without parental consent.

Yes. but it's not illegal to tell people how to go about doing it. I could post my favourite meth recipe right here and it would be perfectly legal. Thinking that anyone's going to get arrested just for hosting the DIY HRT site is cope.
True, but even if it's not illegal, it certainly isn't a good look. If someone just off-hand mentioned how to do something fedposty, for instance, they'd have every right to do so, but I think most people would make the assumption that they know that for a specific reason, and not a good one at that. That's pretty much what Lucas's defense would boil down to in a hypothetical lawsuit, that he didn't do anything technically illegal even if it's obvious that he was doing things that are pretty suspicious on their face.
 
Update on the pending Lolsuit
Troonabout.jpg
Archive
 

View attachment 3710285
View attachment 3710287

he deleted the tweet as i was archiving it, it was at https://twitter.com/keffals/status/1576706869946593282

ffff beaten by a second

View attachment 3710288
This post was quickly deleted, but I had it cached.
View attachment 3710289
Even though these posts are the same information back to back to back, all three of you should be proud of archiving so quickly. That's a level of dedication you couldn't pay for.
 
This can't be a lawsuit because he isn't: seeking compensation or payments for damages
Unless I'm blind or retarded (which both are strong possibilities) the letter says nothing about not seeking monetary relief. Also there's equitable relief such as injuctions that could be sought throught the court. Either way, the use of "advice" could just be them reusing the phrase Lucas did in their initial communications and he is seeking to engage in a suit or he could have actually just hired the firm for initial advice on the subject with a suit being only a distant possibility. I don't know, or care to research, Leaf law so maybe some Canuck Kiwis would have an easier time discovering whether Lucas has some sort of tort action against the farms. I am skeptical to say the least
Hey research-Kiwis, can't you guys figure out which legal firm this is on the basis of the layout of the letter?
It shouldn't be that hard to narrow it down. The last blacked out text is 3, maybe 4, characters in length and the firm is organized as an LLP. I can't remember if Lucas had moved yet by 8/10/2022, so maybe looking for firms within a 30-40 min drive radius from his old place that are llps and have a moniker of ____ Law. I doubt that will come back more than a few matches
 
It was an off the cuff damage control tweet, one that just cost him a lot of good will because it shows he had contact with lawyers prior to the swatting. So it's completely unrelated to his grift on GFM.

The letter says that it's for "advice re doxing and swatting incidents". Since it mentions the swatting, isn't it likely that Kefflas contacted the law firm for advice *after* the encounter with police on August 5th? The "Kiwi Farms" bit might be because Keffals considers the doxing to be related to Kiwi Farms and the law firm checked that they don't have a conflict of interest.
 
It's pretty funny to me that Keffals is attempting to sue the Farms, rather than the police. What is she even going to get out of this? She'll pay a bunch of money to only get a C&D sent, just for Jewsh to post it and laugh at it. Josh, please, if anything to do with this does end up in court, milk her for her GFM money, make her throw it all down the drain.
 
Last edited:
Well he's really bad at it, most women aren't hyper aggressive neanderthals.
i find this is weirdly common with people like lucas. they claim to be women but its always a woman from a male perspective. you rarely see a troon thats a normal woman who just wants to live her life as a woman and thats that. its always these types like lucas or some other weird thing that just screams incel with mommy issues. you can see it in how they walk and talk everything is forced and unnatural because they are acting like what they feel like a woman should act like.
3 things I picked up on:
>Kiwi Farms was searched in their database to ensure no conflict of interests etc, so I'd imagine that it'll be a lolsuit against Null.

>Dated August 10th, that is page 750 of this thread. Not to mention that this is the date they sent the agreement so they probably were in discussions for at least 2-3 days to allow for them to make sure there's no conflict of interest.

>The Swatting was on the 5th so Keffals must've been planning the lolsuit prior to the London police statement in regards to their treatment in police custody (Released on the 10th of August). meaning that instead of getting a lawyer that deals in criminal defense they were instead searching for a civil lawyer.
Edit: Also the computer was returned on the 10th (?) or maybe the 9th meaning that they were still technically considered a potential suspect at this point
if this was the case im pretty sure keffals has no real ground to stand on with section 230 still being a thing and null never really having said anything illegal about keffals i dont really see what hope he would have in court. if he wanted to sue individual members of KF as well as null he could as long as he had evidence that they are posting under that username or whatever. which does make me curious if thats what he was attempting to do when he hired that detective to hunt down @Winter and proceeded to threaten them and what not.

at the end of the day keffals is done for his attempts at burning all the evidence have failed and now everyone knows what kind of person he really is. he could hire 3 lawyers and nothing would change.
 
I'd be more interested in what someone thinks a civil cause of action could be? Neither the LLC nor Null are based in Canada, and the content of this site is legal under US Law. So what is law firm going to do jurisdiction-wise, and what causes can they even bring forward? Laughing at retards on the Internet is still legal in the States as far as I know.
Maybe...intentional infliction of emotional distress? Not very persuasive. I really don't know any cause of action, but the courts of our great country are open to any plaintiff with enough money and retardation. He could try to sue the site or the LLC rather than Josh in his personal capacity, but I don't know under what legal theory that can get around American legal protections for sites like KF. There are a lot of complications to international litigation if he tries to sue in Canada, but I know almost nothing about Canadian clown courts. I honestly don't think a responsible attorney will tell Keffals that it's in his best interests to try and spend more money than he has to engage in a years-long judicial process that has a very low chance of getting anywhere.

I mean...what damages can Keffals even claim? There's 100,000 arguments against him suffering any financial damages, and there's plenty of video of him gallivanting happily around Europe or cavorting with journoshits to go against claims for non-economic damages.
 
i find this is weirdly common with people like lucas. they claim to be women but its always a woman from a male perspective. you rarely see a troon thats a normal woman who just wants to live her life as a woman and thats that. its always these types like lucas or some other weird thing that just screams incel with mommy issues. you can see it in how they walk and talk everything is forced and unnatural because they are acting like what they feel like a woman should act like.

if this was the case im pretty sure keffals has no real ground to stand on with section 230 still being a thing and null never really having said anything illegal about keffals i dont really see what hope he would have in court. if he wanted to sue individual members of KF as well as null he could as long as he had evidence that they are posting under that username or whatever. which does make me curious if thats what he was attempting to do when he hired that detective to hunt down @Winter and proceeded to threaten them and what not.

at the end of the day keffals is done for his attempts at burning all the evidence have failed and now everyone knows what kind of person he really is. he could hire 3 lawyers and nothing would change.
In addition to this, Josh's expressed hatred of pozloading negholes and SWATing will only work against Lucas. The site has always had, in big letters, that poking cows is gay and there has never been any kind of pressure to fuck with Lucas. All of their whining about us SWATing and doxing and Lucas being in danger, when put under a legal microscope, will fall apart.
 
>Aren't harmful
>2% Benzene

Leaving aside its fucking HRT shit being peddled to children to make money, it's got a 2% contamination of a fucking carcinogen that is the shit in Krokodil that causes users to rot from the inside out.
They are charging children money for this shit and encouraging them to inject it, but its not harmful.
The fucks responsible for this should use that fucking GoFundMe Lucas stole to take a group holiday to Mexico, with any luck the Los Zetas will take them to Funky Town.
 
It looks fake as fuck.

There's no letterhead or anything on it
No indication of secure transfer over email, no letterhead, inconsistent formatting (there's no colon after "conflict" despite colons after the previous row headings). It may not be fake, but it's not a sign of retaining a white shoe Toronto firm that will drag Null out of Eastern Europe with crafty legal maneuvers.
 
Law fags can correct me if I am wrong but the wording seems non-specific and clunky for what should be a form letter, right? It's hard to search for documents like this and positively exclude an example but I'm coming up with jack shit in my searches. It reads a lot like something someone would think attorneys would put together. It also seems to kind of merge a Letter of engagement, power of attorney, and a scope of work.
 
What is she even going to get out of this?
Assuming this is a cross-border international dispute involving a legal firm in Canada: Cross-border disputes like this are almost always about libel tourism and forum shopping: forcing the defendant to travel far abroad and pay for a lawyer outside of his usual jurisdiction in order to drain him financially or to get a default judgement issued against him. Many people who have some form of legal insurance only have it to cover the costs of local legal disputes, not international ones. Transnational law does absolutely nothing to account for this blatant gap in the law, and that lay people effectively lose their right to a fair trial the moment they are sued abroad and can no longer rely on legal insurance to pay for their defense. Everything is out of pocket the moment you are sued abroad (because a lot of pro bono firms will not work with non-resident defendants), and these malicious cross-border litigants rely on this fact to drain defendants financially. (Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and this does not constitute legal advice. I am just shitposting. Joshua Moon already has lawyers.)

Remember, this is a war of attrition against Joshua Moon: after denying him a public platform to tell his side of the story (getting him blacklisted everywhere on the net), denying him access to his money (they are still trying to go after his cryptowallets right now), denying him the ability to openly fundraise so that he can meet Keffals' lolsuit on an equal level in court, denying him access to the lawyers of his choice (remember, Keffals' thugs already went after his lawyers, he mentioned this in an update), it's all designed to wear him out and make him throw the towel.

Joshua Moon, please, start fundraising right now.
 
It's pretty funny to me that Keffals is attempting to sue the Farms, rather than the police. What is she even going to get out of this? She'll pay a bunch of money to only get a C&D sent, just for Jewsh to post it and laugh at it. Josh, please, if anything to do with this does end up in court, milk her for her GFM money, make her throw it all down the drain.
If Lucas actually sues our God Emperor he should counter sue back along with Taylor Lorenz, WaPo, Wired etc. They libelled him and did real harm to his business, not to mention all of the illegal cyber attacks.
 
Last edited:
I'd be more interested in what someone thinks a civil cause of action could be? Neither the LLC nor Null are based in Canada, and the content of this site is legal under US Law. So what is law firm going to do jurisdiction-wise, and what causes can they even bring forward? Laughing at retards on the Internet is still legal in the States as far as I know.
It's called vexatious litigation. As long as he can force Null into a lawsuit, he can theoretically cause financial damage. Maybe if Greer, Yaniv, the Mountain Jews, Patrick Tomlinson, Vordrak, and other vexatious litigant lolcows follow suit, they could do some damage even if Null wins everything. Even getting a lawsuit dismissed can be expensive.
 
Back