Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
They do. They unironically believe that dilation is no different than a woman masturbating with a dildo.
The difference is that when someone female dilates her vaginal canal with an object she doesn't need to do it on a semi-regular basis for fear that her vagina will seal up.

Meanwhile it looks like Fong-Jones is getting mean DMs and bitching about @TwitterSafety.
Tweet | Archive
1664766439337.png
To be fair, suspending an account for saying "Maine Coon" is pretty retarded.
1664766545817.png
 
The difference is that when someone female dilates her vaginal canal with an object she doesn't need to do it on a semi-regular basis for fear that her vagina will seal up.

Meanwhile it looks like Fong-Jones is getting mean DMs and bitching about @TwitterSafety.
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 3710846
To be fair, suspending an account for saying "Maine Coon" is pretty retarded.
View attachment 3710850
Out of all things, this is what I latched onto.

1664768776636.png


"It's all the bigotry, they."

Apparently that's a complete sentence to David G.
 
Yet again we have the totally unsubstantiated claim that KF is violating multiple laws. Are we selling bathtub estrogen or something, because that actually would be illegal.
Ah, so you admit you're ignorant of the law. Well, let me an uncertified unqualified expert provide you with a little true and honest legalsplainer.

Things I like: legal.
Things I dislike: illegal.
Things I hate: extra very illegal.
 
The difference is that when someone female dilates her vaginal canal with an object she doesn't need to do it on a semi-regular basis for fear that her vagina will seal up.

Meanwhile it looks like Fong-Jones is getting mean DMs and bitching about @TwitterSafety.
Tweet | Archive
View attachment 3710846
To be fair, suspending an account for saying "Maine Coon" is pretty retarded.
View attachment 3710850
And yet despite complaining for years about how awful Twitter is, these chucklefucks are still using it.
 
To be fair, suspending an account for saying "Maine Coon" is pretty retarded
It's also the inevitable result of the technocratic systems of censorship they demanded. Nuance and context are irrelevant. That's what they kept insisting in their crusade to have bad words erased from reality.
 
To be fair, suspending an account for saying "Maine Coon" is pretty retarded.
Is this chink attacking some poor Indian ESL employee for not grasping the nuances of English? Shamefur dispray!

He sounds like a boomer on a tech support call complaining about them damn dotheads he can't understand.
 
Theres a thing called archivebox I think it can be self hosted not sure if it would work like archive.ph though I've been looking into running a service like this and it unfortunately isn't very cheap. There needs to be a lot more archival services like the ph one. And for some reason having archival services like you mentioned upsets fong dong cause that means people can archive when he says dumb shit. The rules have always been once it's on the internet it's there forever. I think it should stay that way

https://archivebox.io/

I think the main issues are a) anything hosted by Null is going to come under the same sort of attack pattern we're seeing from Dong Long Gone and the rest of the Legion of Troon. Also, the storage requirements might be pretty significant; there is a LOT of autism to record, after all. The idea of a self-hosted archive is great, but I think it'd need to be distributed/decentralized to solve both of those problems.
The storage issue is less of a problem than the deplatforming. If you stick to archiving websites (ie not video), the storage requirements are minimal.

I've been thinking about this problem a lot because relying on just one or two trusted archival sites is a big risk and there needs to be a solution for that.

Decentralization is a good solution to the deplatforming problem but then you quickly erode the only reason archiving is useful at all: the big archival sites have a reputation that people trust.

Why do we prefer archiving over screenshots? Because people can doctor screenshots. Screenshots don't mean shit.

Archives are good not because they preserve the html of the original, but because the archive site (archive.ph or archive.org) itself is a reputable third party that is trusted not to change the record. If one of the operators of one of those sites wanted to, there's no technical reason why they can't just doctor the archives they're storing. Hell, it'd be easier than a screencap. We just trust them not to.

If there were a dozen small archival sites, especially one accused of bring run by Null or his friends, then that archive isn't any better than a screenshot. We'd be missing the trust in the eyes of the public.

Now one way decentralization could be done would be to have the site that does the original archive cryptographically sign a zip of the archive. Then other people can run nodes that federate with each other to share signed archives. If you go to an archived page on one of these services, you'd be able to get a link to the original archiving site and see the sig to check yourself.

Thus there could be a primary, trusted main archival service. Maybe run by a non-profit or something, and then null could run his own instance to mirror it. Even if troons get Trusted (And Not Corrupt Like IA) Archive Service taken down with lawfare or whatever, null's archives would still exist and more importantly, still retain that trust because they'd still be signed by T(ANCLIA)AS's certificate.

Archivebox actually sounds like a good base for such a system. It seems like it could be modified pretty easily to support something like that.
 
Why do we prefer archiving over screenshots? Because people can doctor screenshots. Screenshots don't mean shit.
And that's why these criminal troons hate such sites. Not because they're defamatory or "stochastic terrorism" or whatever argle-bargle they claim, but precisely because they are an accurate representation of their public statements advocating crimes or just being ridiculous, stupid, insane perverts.
 
Liz has a tip for all the girls in IT

View attachment 3709511

good fucking lord lmao. imagine somebody walking up to you at your software dev job and saying some shit like waiting for the code to compile gave them just enough time to dilate their asshole to optimal diameter for horse dildo play later. please keep the details of your disgusting body and the unnatural shit you do to it to yourself. nobody cares about your fucking KaFkA cLuStEr either, this post was made solely to announce to the world that they just shoved a dildo in their wound to keep it open

thanks for sharing.gif
 
The storage issue is less of a problem than the deplatforming. If you stick to archiving websites (ie not video), the storage requirements are minimal.

I've been thinking about this problem a lot because relying on just one or two trusted archival sites is a big risk and there needs to be a solution for that.

Decentralization is a good solution to the deplatforming problem but then you quickly erode the only reason archiving is useful at all: the big archival sites have a reputation that people trust.

Why do we prefer archiving over screenshots? Because people can doctor screenshots. Screenshots don't mean shit.

Archives are good not because they preserve the html of the original, but because the archive site (archive.ph or archive.org) itself is a reputable third party that is trusted not to change the record. If one of the operators of one of those sites wanted to, there's no technical reason why they can't just doctor the archives they're storing. Hell, it'd be easier than a screencap. We just trust them not to.

If there were a dozen small archival sites, especially one accused of bring run by Null or his friends, then that archive isn't any better than a screenshot. We'd be missing the trust in the eyes of the public.

Now one way decentralization could be done would be to have the site that does the original archive cryptographically sign a zip of the archive. Then other people can run nodes that federate with each other to share signed archives. If you go to an archived page on one of these services, you'd be able to get a link to the original archiving site and see the sig to check yourself.

Thus there could be a primary, trusted main archival service. Maybe run by a non-profit or something, and then null could run his own instance to mirror it. Even if troons get Trusted (And Not Corrupt Like IA) Archive Service taken down with lawfare or whatever, null's archives would still exist and more importantly, still retain that trust because they'd still be signed by T(ANCLIA)AS's certificate.

Archivebox actually sounds like a good base for such a system. It seems like it could be modified pretty easily to support something like that.
Maybe something like Archivebox + IPFS + Open Timestamps? That would solve storage issues for larger files (e.g., video), and provide a chain-of-custody type timestamp for things. The weak link (right now) would be the performance of IPFS, I suppose, if data isn't local.
 
good fucking lord lmao. imagine somebody walking up to you at your software dev job and saying some shit like waiting for the code to compile gave them just enough time to dilate their asshole to optimal diameter for horse dildo play later. please keep the details of your disgusting body and the unnatural shit you do to it to yourself. nobody cares about your fucking KaFkA cLuStEr either, this post was made solely to announce to the world that they just shoved a dildo in their wound to keep it open

View attachment 3711601
Yeah exactly what I was saying, the thing that makes AGP's so fucking gross (even more so than the average HSTS that while equally insane isn't usually so exhibitionist) is that they literally get a sick pleasure out of shoving their disgusting and abhorrent perversions in peoples faces.
 
One of the things that really amazes me is the amount of people that still try to interact and have a conversation with the troon squad on Twitter, Reddit, whatever. It's completely pointless, since troons like Eliot Dong-Gone or the failed fart dominatrix are hyper-self-centered and delusional, without any care for reality or others.

My advice is to just avoid any interaction with them at all, or just reply to anything they say with either "XY =/= XX", or the following image:

1664812135060.png


The end result is the same as trying to have a rational conversation with them: blocked, reported, being called transphobe, etc.
 
Yeah exactly what I was saying, the thing that makes AGP's so fucking gross (even more so than the average HSTS that while equally insane isn't usually so exhibitionist) is that they literally get a sick pleasure out of shoving their disgusting and abhorrent perversions in peoples faces.
And they'll always cry twanzfobia when you point out how disgusting and gross they are, as if it wouldn't be just as cringy to have some "cishet dudebro" constantly going on and on about how he, like, totally fucked his girlfriend right in the pussy last night.
 
And they'll always cry twanzfobia when you point out how disgusting and gross they are, as if it wouldn't be just as cringy to have some "cishet dudebro" constantly going on and on about how he, like, totally fucked his girlfriend right in the pussy last night.

I would prefer this lol. at least the guy fucking his girlfriend isn't trying to normalize having stunning amounts of mental illness and shamelessly committing unholy crimes against God and nature
 
Back