Dylan James Mulvaney / Days of Girlhood / Day __ of Being a Girl - Dylan Explains It All, a gay man interprets 'girlhood' in all glorious technicolor.

Hi friends! I'm new to this thread.
I noticed nobody shared this video from 4 days ago. It's... something.


He said it's for some "Bros" movie premiere that he's attending (because of course he is)
Here's the trailer for that dumpster fire of a movie. I can't wait for all of the paid critic reviews to drop!

(I'm so sorry I'm unable to archive things rn... I'm uploading this from my phone)
 
Here's the trailer for that dumpster fire of a movie. I can't wait for all of the paid critic reviews to drop!
View attachment 3711688
(I'm so sorry I'm unable to archive things rn... I'm uploading this from my phone)
As someone who's in this film's targeted demographic, I literally grimaced. Will I thirstwatch it for the hot men on some discreet site a few months from now? Probably, but I can't tell if this is supposed to be a parody of what the LBGT community is like today or if the filmmakers are for real. I assume they're going for the parody angle because of that jab at Jenner, but geez.
 


Every frame is horrifying.
1664836856443.pngCapture2.PNG
And since it's spooky season:
1664837121488.png1664837319247.png
 
He said it's for some "Bros" movie premiere that he's attending (because of course he is)
Here's the trailer for that dumpster fire of a movie. I can't wait for all of the paid critic reviews to drop!
View attachment 3711688
(I'm so sorry I'm unable to archive things rn... I'm uploading this from my phone)
1664839121958.png

Good reviews from both critics and viewers (the film reel container could have contained nothing but a dead rat and typhus and the premise of a gay romcom alone would have earned it at least a 50% from critics.) Screenwriter/star Billy Eichner is currently on Twitter blaming its bomb at the box office on straight people, naturally.
1664839241678.png
 
"Excluding males from something is the worst thing I could ever do." -Slothkween, 2022.

Aye, there's the rub! That is our (women's) biggest and most egregious crime, against these men larping as women. If the West continues on like this, it's game over.
Miss sloth made a very poignant video however I can't help but wonder what is it socially acceptable to exclude women from?
:thinking:
 
Last edited:
View attachment 3713053
Good reviews from both critics and viewers (the film reel container could have contained nothing but a dead rat and typhus and the premise of a gay romcom alone would have earned it at least a 50% from critics.) Screenwriter/star Billy Eichner is currently on Twitter blaming its bomb at the box office on straight people, naturally.
View attachment 3713061
Apologies for the very late response, but this dude's cope level is INSANE :story:

I didn't really like him in his show where he walks around NYC, and I definitely don't like him now. What an arrogant, attention-seeking manbaby.

FYI, Billy, maybe the movie would've performed better at the box office if it wasn't full of promiscuity, radical/progressive talking points, and literal gay sex scenes (orgies, I believe?)... just a thought. :popcorn:

(not like the plot could've been saved if it were hetero-- it was doomed from the start)
 
Niss sloth made a very poignant video however I can't help but wonder what is it socially acceptable to exclude women from?
:thinking:
Fewer things than u can exclude men from.

I see grants, scholarships, fellowships, mentoring and even jobs etc that are female specific (i.e. men are not eligible for no actual reason aside from 'representation' and given that about half the people I meet in my profession are female i fail to understand why such things are even tolerated beyond people taking advantage of politics) but not a single one that women are excluded from. Its not unreasonable to take the view that there is simply more explicit support for women (or minorities for that matter) than there is for men despite there being more competition for men due to higher numbers in the workforce.

Try offering a scholarship for which only straight, white males are eligible and get sued but u get praised for offering one that is women/minority only. It is truly a disgusting double standard. The one i find worse is clubs. If someone runs a womens advancement club for advancing women thats fine but if I run the same thing but men only I am sexist? Same ia true for race and sexuality. March for black pride or gay pride and have big clubs and slogans up everywhere no problems but lets say I wanted to do the same for my group (straight, white, educated males) and I have no doubt I would be reviled.

This guy might be on to something though. If I can keep my beard and mode of dress but claim to be a troon i can prob gain an advantage same as he is. I like to think I have more self respect than that though.
 
Last edited:
Women need separate spaces from men because men are statistically dangerous to women. Not because of competition or support or shit, you dingleberries are conflating it with affirmative action which has nothing to do with women not wanting creepy perverts following them into dressing rooms.
 
Women need separate spaces from men because men are statistically dangerous to women. Not because of competition or support or shit, you dingleberries are conflating it with affirmative action which has nothing to do with women not wanting creepy perverts following them into dressing rooms.
That is nowhere near what I am talking about (fyi separate spaces for toilets is actually a new thing originating relatively recently. Look it up or I can pass u a reference). Personally I just think we should go back to unisex spaces and be effing done with all this bs.

Absolutely the whole creepy perverts things is not acceptable but telling me that its ok to discriminate as long as its in favour of women or minorities is wrong. Either everyone is equal and gets the same or the lip service needs to stop and everyone gets to discrimate on whatever basis they feel comfortable with. Its only fair. Giving one group extra support, garaunteed jobs etc is just discrimination under another name so realistically if anything can be women only then I can write 'women need not apply' on a job ad if I want. Not saying I think its right to do that I am just saying it is fair.
 
Last edited:
FYI, Billy, maybe the movie would've performed better at the box office if it wasn't full of promiscuity, radical/progressive talking points, and literal gay sex scenes (orgies, I believe?)... just a thought. :popcorn:

(not like the plot could've been saved if it were hetero-- it was doomed from the start)
It also seems Billy completely forgot that RomComs aren't the largest box office draws to begin with, let alone one as niche as this. But whatever, seethe and cope and blame those dang dirty hets.
 
Ah good old Jess! He never needed to respond to her, here's hoping he keeps at it.

Local copy [Archive]:
View attachment 3709471
"Maybe one day we could collab together so you could teach me to do my makeup and wear heels so I can be a real girl like you."
I would PAY to see that.
This video was better comedy than all the "Days of Girlhood" parodies combined.
@Random Dyke That man with the white trousers and tanktop is clearly gay for Dylan
 
Last edited:
It also seems Billy completely forgot that RomComs aren't the largest box office draws to begin with, let alone one as niche as this. But whatever, seethe and cope and blame those dang dirty hets.
As Ben Shapiro put it on his podcast yesterday:

Guys don't willingly enjoy rom-coms. They only enioy them if their girlfriends or wives force them to

Say what you want about that guy, but it's 100% the truth. Men prefer action movies, not rom-coms
 
That is nowhere near what I am talking about (fyi separate spaces for toilets is actually a new thing originating relatively recently. Look it up or I can pass u a reference). Personally I just think we should go back to unisex spaces and be effing done with all this bs.

Absolutely the whole creepy perverts things is not acceptable but telling me that its ok to discriminate as long as its in favour of women or minorities is wrong. Either everyone is equal and gets the same or the lip service needs to stop and everyone gets to discrimate on whatever basis they feel comfortable with. Its only fair. Giving one group extra support, garaunteed jobs etc is just discrimination under another name so realistically if anything can be women only then I can write 'women need not apply' on a job ad if I want. Not saying I think its right to do that I am just saying it is fair.
I would not call the mid-late 19th century "relatively recently", and that largely took so long because upper class women were not really supposed to be hanging out in male-dominated public spaces prior to that (they'd be spending time in private houses or at home raising children) and people didn't care about working class women. Not to mention the rareness of installed toilets and the ubiquity of commodes, chamber-pots, single occupancy privies and/or going to the toilet in an alleyway, especially if you're looking pre-19th century.

This historical context is irrelevant anyway, everyone knows women's toilets now exist so thar Dylan can get euphoric over pretending to have a barbie-pouch and offering unsuspecting girlies a tampon under the stall.
 
i would drive my car straight into the Mississippi with a trunk full of cement mix before going to a theatre to see a rom-com in current year, especially one made by and about giggling Twitter-brained slay queen faggots. there hasn’t been a good rom-com made since before i was born

boring ass article
5FFAF404-C12B-4F45-BF7D-E8556FD84974.jpeg

what the fuck is this pedo look lmao. dude needs electrolysis for his larp, badly. a whole mason jar of house paint couldn’t cover up that Homer Simpson mouth.

8497FDE1-21E7-4188-A0BB-5E8DB2619116.jpeg

uh oh, unapproved and literally genocidal opinion spotted. thank god he has products to consoom to give him a fat princess poker! too bad they still don’t make him look like a woman.
 
He's calling himself "Dilly" more often.

1664948306929.png
When he again lifted the lid off Lucy’s coffin we all looked—Arthur trembling like an aspen—and saw that the body lay there in all its death-beauty. But there was no love in my own heart, nothing but loathing for the foul Thing which had taken Lucy’s shape without her soul. I could see even Arthur’s face grow hard as he looked. Presently he said to Van Helsing:—​
“Is this really Lucy’s body, or only a demon in her shape?”​
“It is her body, and yet not it. But wait a while, and you all see her as she was, and is.”​
She seemed like a nightmare of Lucy as she lay there; the pointed teeth, the bloodstained, voluptuous mouth—which it made one shudder to see—the whole carnal and unspiritual appearance, seeming like a devilish mockery of Lucy’s sweet purity.​

Happy Halloween Dylan! Love your costume!
View attachment 3714560
No silly, he's going to be a little girl, just like in real life.

1664948218688.png
 
Back