- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
After years of Rainbow propaganda in the Met your average ( and they are) copper wouldn’t have a clue what the actual laws are any more. I suggest the likely scenario is Anthony Hayden turned up with just enough “evidence“ to seem like a victim, and just enough legally informed victimhood to frighten them into action.- there has to be something more in what was alleged that causes the police to actually go to the premises (rather than send a letter) and seize electronic devices.
I hope Ms. Farrow gets to know exactly what that was very soon.
No police investigation, including the interview, is about finding out all the facts. It’s sole purpose is to gather evidence that can be used. Good advice, don’t talk to the police about anything. Nothing good and possibly something bad will come of it.
Ma Farrow has handed over her life in an attempt to prove a negative: that she didn’t do the things he said she did. Legally the burden of proof is on the prosecution, but everyone seems to have forgotten that. Maybe they seized her devices without a warrant under the bullshit laws now in place around trans feelings and terrorism. But police lie all the time and they cannot be trusted to do the work of exonerating you. That’s not why they arrested or detained yoI in the first place.