Susie Green & Mermaids UK - "Trans Kid Support Charity", Susie had her underage kid get GRS

One of the mermaids trustees (appointed in July) is an one of those openly paedo queer theory academia perves).
The arrogance of these child molesters is infuriating. They were already taking heat for their malevolent actions against children by then, and they thought it was a great time to put an out and proud pedophile on their board. What the everloving fuck? Maybe it's been too long since lynching was a thing.
 
The arrogance of these child molesters is infuriating. They were already taking heat for their malevolent actions against children by then, and they thought it was a great time to put an out and proud pedophile on their board. What the everloving fuck? Maybe it's been too long since lynching was a thing.

I’m amazed that someone has actually managed to surpass the horrors of the NSPCC rubbersuitedwankman pissing himself in the work toilets and uploading the footage to a porn site, with a caption referencing his job at leading national children’s charity….

But Susie Green said ‘hold my beer‘ and here we are.

I’m hoping this might be such a spectacular explosion of finger pointing that Mermaids also manage to take down The National Autistic Society with them.
Turns out they are also being investigated for safeguarding failures but have thus far managed to keep it out of the mainstream press:

All three 3rd Sector Magazine articles were published between 23rd September and 3rd October. Surely someone at the Charities Commission is making these connections?

12061783-59DA-411B-9E55-6B8AFB6F4596.jpegD44F8CBE-C11C-4731-8D56-5972844ADC35.jpegB04F51D6-0E94-4639-8057-8DA1B34F023C.jpeg5D1288F6-B482-4A50-8BCD-EA2EAA03C577.jpeg
 
I’m amazed that someone has actually managed to surpass the horrors of the NSPCC rubbersuitedwankman pissing himself in the work toilets and uploading the footage to a porn site, with a caption referencing his job at leading national children’s charity….
Wait what? How the fuck did I not hear about this before now?

I’m hoping this might be such a spectacular explosion of finger pointing that Mermaids also manage to take down The National Autistic Society with them.
At this point I'm lowkey hoping it brings down literally every single charity even tangentially related to children, because they're seemingly all fucking rotten to the core at this point.
 
Yeah. James Makings.

britterves were poking around the internet trying to fathom the inexplicable NSPCC decision to employ diversity-hire-kill-all-whiteys-MtF Munroe Bergdorf (esquire).

And the celebrity liaison staff member was bragging about hiring Munroe, so the terves had a little look into the celeb bookers online footprint.

Daft dickhead had a personal blog listed on his linked in, from there they found his rubberman boot boy pals and from there his amateur porn.

It all unfolded in real time on mumsnet and when the middle aged mummies tried to tell the NSPCC the charity immediately started smearing the mums as homophobes (because obviously gay men can’t be held to the same workplace standards as straight men! Which sounds like homophobia to me, but then I don’t have blue hair).

Mumsnet deleted the thread because of all the accusations thrown at the mums for being Nazis in Boden dresses and the site being smeared as Prosecco Stormfront (for the crime of site users not liking men wanking while at work at a children’s charity).

but I could probably get a pdf of the deleted thread.

It took a few weeks for that one to hit the papers because it was the era of no debate but Uncommon Ground put out a Jo Bartosch piece:


And a week later The Mirror went ahead and published without naming him:


And then later on released his name (after he’d been officially fired)


9DD946AD-45B9-44E5-9698-8A9ADDF99D23.jpeg6D7AD1C9-A8C9-4F0B-B4EF-0D80AD5E1B99.jpeg981CBEBF-A8A1-4572-B4A4-5440C9E5927B.jpeg82408A88-35A2-4DBA-99A7-F0BADE14D1B3.jpeg948D67E9-B586-411C-9F85-783F504F5D08.jpeg
 
It's utterly insane how autism charities are so captured by this shit. I can count on one hand the number of autism experts and groups who are against sterilising and/or noncing autistic kids. You'd think there'd be more speaking out about it or focusing on safeguarding at least.
Manroe Bergdorf has said some mad shit on Twitter but the worst one was when he tweeted that kids could DM him in secret if they wanted someone to talk to. I've no reason to believe he is a paedo, but just really naive about child safeguarding; he might mean well, but then any paedo can point to it and say "hey, kids, message me in secret, this celebrity activist said it was okay".

Also did this fucking idiot miss the part where James Makings was jerking off into his rubber suit at work? My sex life doesn't figure into my job at all, because I don't wank in the damn office.
1664833041269.png
 
The Paedo walked. Mermaids ‘didn’t know’
:story:
Archive: https://archive.ph/2lfgj

(article is paywalled)
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/990e9e88-434f-11ed-8885-043c27446b97
0AFFAF94-0AD8-48F5-90BE-F50C7C72FC77.jpegEAB130DE-0BD5-4F2F-A2E3-C159E159D064.png

The Mermaids Paedo, Dr Jacob Breslaw, when talking about paraphilias in the DSM 5, compared sex with kids to shoe fetishism (demoing that he sees children as objects for wanking over)

EA2AA2B9-EEA4-470C-96A3-4F6B3B19B390.jpeg

He took his Twitter down last night, but the terves archived yesterday afternoon:


Jolly Jo’s tweet didn’t age well. 2 days is a long time in Gender Land.
 
Susie Green really is a dumb bitch. She's staffed Mermaids with friends and sycophants none of whom were able to do a quick google search for Breslow before appointing him to the board of a children's charity. They don't even list the trustees or staff on the board any more, for a charity of Mermaids type, there should at a minimum be at least one person with a history in public relations and/or media. As well as retired politicians or senior civil servants, maybe a lawyer (who could have warned her quietly about getting into bed with Joloyon).... Instead she appoints a fucking Pedo.

Whatever about letting Joloyon Maugham talk her into taking a legal case that exposed Mermaids to a degree of scrutiny that they can't cope with, allowing an unmoderated chat for children is just a different league of stupidity.

Notice how they're not attacking the Times after they published two exposes back to back about them.


That's because they're shit scared about what else the journalists may have found in those chat groups. The Times rivals the Daily Mail in employing nasty people with real investigatory and journalism skills, it wouldn't surprise me that they've made clear to Mermaids that if they make any allegations against the paper, they've plenty more dirt to fire back with.
 
Reduxx’s take on Jacob Breslaw:
A8A0E8E6-36EB-4160-95C6-9B1B7803FFB2.jpeg



Completely agree, @Trig.Point - they should’ve had a safeguarding specialist social worker either on trustees or on payroll - someone in a role like Sonia Appleby’s, Sonia who GIDS at the the Tavistock and Portland tried to sideline after she became a whistleblower and tried to warn higher ups about all the weird shit happening to kids on their books.

Susie Green sees herself as some sort of Benevolent God of Trans Babies, no wonder it’s easy for paedos to infiltrate her organisation.

I hope journalists are having a proper dig around Mermaids bins now.

D5CD5FF7-01A0-4CC1-A96D-36FAAC9C35C1.jpeg

 
The Mermaids Paedo, Dr Jacob Breslaw, when talking about paraphilias in the DSM 5, compared sex with kids to shoe fetishism (demoing that he sees children as objects for wanking over)
Psychopaths consider other human beings as not actually being people but as being objects that solely exist for their benefit. This guy is a bona fide Bundy level psychopath.
 
Psychopaths consider other human beings as not actually being people but as being objects that solely exist for their benefit. This guy is a bona fide Bundy level psychopath.
Woah. Yes.
Dehumanisation to the level of object is proper serial killer/necrophile stuff.

This is the write up of the propaedo symposium (child sex offender simp-osium?) where the wanking on shoes/kids stuff comes from.


5897D51F-B4C7-4E0D-9EDD-66D481B01541.jpeg53168DB3-208A-422A-A939-9E979D908B28.jpeg
 
Next, he presumably argued that it's perfectly rational to wear the child's skin as a fancy suit and dance around in front of a mirror, because the mirror obviously consents, being a reflection of the self.
Only if you're listening to the right music at the time.

"Goodbye Horses."
 
Mermaids really seem to be getting more and more shit from the main stream press in the UK, mean even BBC News is reporting some of it.

Do wonder two things, if the lawsuits they brought against LGB Alliance made people look more into them, and secondly if people like Hbomberguy and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will say anything after they raised money for Mermaids without doing the most basic research.
 
Mermaids really seem to be getting more and more shit from the main stream press in the UK, mean even BBC News is reporting some of it.

Do wonder two things, if the lawsuits they brought against LGB Alliance made people look more into them, and secondly if people like Hbomberguy and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will say anything after they raised money for Mermaids without doing the most basic research.
It’s a snowball. Let’s hope it gets big enough to take out lots of nonces, and as for H Bomber Guy - do you think he’ll ever admit Graham Linehan was right or would he rather fake his own death, Byuu-style?
It's clear this is how these troons view the children they groom. It's no excuse most of them were groomed themselves.

I feel sad for the kids they used to be whilst also hoping they spend their entire adult lives on the nonce unit.

Gotta break that cycle somehow and never letting the paedos get near another kid ever again seems to be the only way.

Pink News has now covered it.


And spiked:



42BFD238-F14D-4768-BC83-262B9144D749.jpeg
6 days in the life of Penis News.
 
Last edited:
You work with kids you must get a background check, really want to know if they even did that and if not, why?

I want to know if they not look, did they just fail to find any red flags or did they not just care. This a huge failure and does bring into question how they operate, it's not goo enough to say "it's okay now, he is no longer part of mermaids" there huge failure here that needs more answers than “We will be reviewing our processes and procedures in light of this event to make them even more robust. Safeguarding is of the utmost importance to Mermaids and the safety of the young people we support is our highest priority.”

Hell will they be making that review public? I doubt it, also will the review be done by themselves or outscored to a non -bias third party to give an impartial opinion.
 
It's clear this is how these troons view the children they groom. It's no excuse most of them were groomed themselves.
I don't think they were. Lundy Bancroft, the guy who wrote "Why Does He Do That?", works with wifebeaters and abusers, and he says loads of them claim they were abused in childhood. But he challenges them on it: if they know how bad it feels, why do it to someone else?
That's when they usually recant and admit they were lying to get sympathy, and when the sympathy isn't forthcoming, they admit it. Remember paedos learn to manipulate people, not just the children they abuse, they groom everyone around them.
 
“We will be reviewing our processes and procedures in light of this event to make them even more robust. Safeguarding is of the utmost importance to Mermaids and the safety of the young people we support is our highest priority.”
"And this is why we put a pedophile on our board who compared raping a child to ejaculating on a shoe."
 
Back