Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

1664841019513.png

[L][A]

Fortress arc part 2 I guess, but this obviously favors keffals far more as most scrutiny is directed there.
 
For the record, Vaush has come to the defense of billion $$ corporations like Disney (along with other major studios like Amazon & their new LOTR show) every time they've released some new remake that injects wokeness, political correctness, etc. into whatever piece of media it is they're releasing to varying amounts of negative feedback from fans. What this usually always means is taking characters that were originally white and now making them black, I'm sure you're all familiar with this phenomenon that seems to only be picking up more & more steam as of late.

This clip is from his YouTube upload covering the upcoming release of the revamped Little Mermaid. Video title: WHY MERMAID NO WHITE. He's once again doing exactly as I described above but only this time with a twist. Early on in the vid he attempts to distance himself from anything that could potentially sound like he's running cover for the multi-billion $$ corporation, in this case Disney. Just listen to what he has to say on the matter. Vaush knows that he had to make this vid. It was the culture war battleground of the week and he wasn't going to let a trending topic that's right up his alley like this one slip by with nothing to say and without a monetized upload. So his course of action is to instead imply that the Disney executives who continue following this same outrage model with every new release, well actually they themselves are essentially fascist as well and are fighting decisions like race-swapping iconic characters at every turn. The execs green-lighting these kind of creative decisions are actually aligned with Nick Fuentes-types and hate, hate, hate the race swapping of characters like Ariel in the Lil' Mermaid. He's saying that the same Disney higher ups who are sponsoring classes on CRT and troon gender theory for 1st graders in Florida are actually fascists themselves, just the same as what he describes are the reactionary content creators/internet people who are criticizing the move to make Ariel a jogger.

He goes on to say that those same execs are racist as hell and in his words "hate black people" and that they're only making these decisions because it's what sells the most theater tickets/Blu Ray's/merchandise in 2022. I just thought this was a somewhat funny moment and one that also highlights Ian's insecurities. His trajectory as a political streamer has been anything but normal and honestly his positions mostly just confuse me these days, but not this one. I think it's a calculated move to defend Disney's move here just like he knows all of his fans want him to, while also trying to get ahead of any potential criticism that Disney's crimes against humanity are on a scale much greater then some groyper whitening black Ariel's skin and calling Ariel's love interest, Prince Eric, a nigger lover. He can't allow himself to just be honest with his viewers because in his mind he'd be compromising on his own stated beliefs by uploading a hour+ long video righteously coming to the defense of Disney. This is a dumb, long-winded post but I'm just hyped to be back on the Farms and posting again so shot from the hip on this one, think I need a little bit of time to get back in the groove.

 
Last edited:
It's amazing how someone can spout this many words while saying almost nothing. It's so much innuendo that it is embarrassing to witness.

Its telling he implies democracy is a faciliative process to implement leftist social engineering and whatever his personal ideas are, and that discourse is basically a therapeutic session for schizophrenics-convincing them to accede to "reality" as defined by the therapist.

This is what they mean by "democracy" they basically mean "we rule you obey".
 
This isn't related to that clip directly but check out the emoticons in the chat. Almost every single one is a co-opted 4chan meme. I see soyjack, the Chad "yes" meme and several versions of pepe (Pepe who is a mascot for people they think are Nazi chuds) The only non 4chan derived meme I see in the entire chat is the tophat pig which is just a cutout of a USSR propaganda poster from 100 years ago. How can leftists who have so many artists and comedians among them have so little creativity? I couldn't name a popular leftie meme if you had me at gunpoint.

Also how the fuck are you going to use the soyjack meme when it was made directly to mock you?
 
This isn't related to that clip directly but check out the emoticons in the chat. Almost every single one is a co-opted 4chan meme. I see soyjack, the Chad "yes" meme and several versions of pepe (Pepe who is a mascot for people they think are Nazi chuds) The only non 4chan derived meme I see in the entire chat is the tophat pig which is just a cutout of a USSR propaganda poster from 100 years ago. How can leftists who have so many artists and comedians among them have so little creativity? I couldn't name a popular leftie meme if you had me at gunpoint.

Also how the fuck are you going to use the soyjack meme when it was made directly to mock you?
There's also Kanna from Dragon Maid and "amazin" with amazon's text style.
 
"Well you see the PS5 I bought with on stream's worth of superchats is actually sold at a loss."
How would this even make Capitalism evil? Is he saying all firms price gouge?
I think...he's saying it's never been a rule in capitalist economics that the price the consumer pays must in some way be derived from or commensurate with the cost of producing the product. In short-you might have to pay 100 dollars for a brand-new thing at the mall that cost eight dollars to make.
 
I think...he's saying it's never been a rule in capitalist economics that the price the consumer pays must in some way be derived from or commensurate with the cost of producing the product. In short-you might have to pay 100 dollars for a brand-new thing at the mall that cost eight dollars to make.
So he accepts that price is subjective and the labor theory of value Marx proposed is complete bullshit? I mean we already knew that as Marx went as far as to claim a tool can never create more value than it's worth because he had to warp his theory around the labor of a person while other schools of economics, particularly capitalist ones, based price on what a person is willing to pay.

Or in short, Vaush admits to not actually believe in his hero Marx. Color me shocked that he's yet another fake socialist/commie.
 
I think...he's saying it's never been a rule in capitalist economics that the price the consumer pays must in some way be derived from or commensurate with the cost of producing the product. In short-you might have to pay 100 dollars for a brand-new thing at the mall that cost eight dollars to make.
Okay so he thinks all firms price gouge.
And by gouge he means...respond to demand.
I have an artist friend who just does commissions for friends for a fee because otherwise he'd be swamped by requests. And frivolous requests. That's why the price goes up due to demand or prestige. It's not just "greed" but logistical.
This guy has never had a real job where he's had to call shots. It's not easy. And by thinking it's easy he chalks various decisions up to caprice.
 

Matt Walsh talks about teenagers having sex with other teenagers in a decade old clip, Vaush tries to frame it as him supporting pedophilia somehow, I'm not a fan of this Walsh guy, but man this is disingenuous. I don't get why throwing around pedo accusations is just the go to strategy of partisan hacks these days
 

Matt Walsh talks about teenagers having sex with other teenagers in a decade old clip, Vaush tries to frame it as him supporting pedophilia somehow, I'm not a fan of this Walsh guy, but man this is disingenuous. I don't get why throwing around pedo accusations is just the go to strategy of partisan hacks these days
Apparently, the entire context of the clip was him talking about boomers in the past having the ability to get hooked up & gain financial independence at an early age compared to millennials where they're not considered fully mature till their mid 20's.
<iframe src="https://www.mediamatters.org/media/3994596/embed/embed" class="" height="360" width="480" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>

Also, this is rich coming Vaush. Wasn't there a clip of him arguing in favor of lowering the age of consent & a screenshot of him saying that jacking off to selfies of teenagers isn't a big deal?
 

Matt Walsh talks about teenagers having sex with other teenagers in a decade old clip, Vaush tries to frame it as him supporting pedophilia somehow, I'm not a fan of this Walsh guy, but man this is disingenuous. I don't get why throwing around pedo accusations is just the go to strategy of partisan hacks these days
The pot is calling the kettle black, here. We all know Vaush is an unabashed pedophile.
 
Vaush debates a white nationalist (named Martinez lol)

The guy did pretty poorly but he did completely stump Vaush at this one part. Just imagine how different the response would be if the races were swapped.
 
Walsh was saying he didn't have an issue with teen pregnancy as such as much as unmarried teen pregnancy. Essentially-he was arguing girls should get married earlier, in either their late teens or early twenties-as opposed to riding the cock carousel through their college years, and either ending up a single mother or not having kids at all.

Like the sun rising in the east, people including Vaush shouted "you are the real groomer!' when it actually is a case of "false equivalence." Sexually molesting children and turning them into trannies is not remotely similar too...a 19 year old girl foregoing college and marrying some guy and is pregnant before her 20th birthday.
 
Back