Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 16.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 24.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 153 40.4%

  • Total voters
    379
I keep seeing ban after ban after ban and it's like what do these people expect? There's clearly on one kind of poliotical content that will be allowed on mainstream sites. Every edgytuber should move to these alt platforms instead of trying to cling to them.
They should spend every second they can building an audience on the mainstream and simulcasting on alt platforms and telling their audience where to go when they are banned.
 
I wouldn't say that. Nick's streams are his main source of income. He hasn't actually lawyered in a while, and when he was lawyering (while also doing his nightly shows) he was charging very little or going full pro bono.

So this ban is substantially hitting his ability to feed/house/clothe himself and his family.
Isn't he sitting on a trust fund big enough that he doesn't even need to work?

Also the weasel lawyer-talk is getting tiresome. Everyone knows what "the wall" means. The "But I didn't say the actual words that everyone knows I meant" bit 1) insults our intelligence and 2) implies that you really think that saying the actual words that everyone knows you meant might be wrong and actionable. Just fucking own it. Nobody gets banned for saying pedos and rapists should be shot, what's the difference?
 
View attachment 3718255
Nick's channel has been terminated
Reading out the names onstream was probably a bad idea. Even if it's legal or public record or whatever, people were looking for a reason to get him banned and he gave them one. I know that's not popular to say, but beating the hornets nest with a stick while they're already stinging you is not a good move.
 
Reading out the names onstream was probably a bad idea. Even if it's legal or public record or whatever, people were looking for a reason to get him banned and he gave them one. I know that's not popular to say, but beating the hornets nest with a stick while they're already stinging you is not a good move.
This is a good argument but let me respond briefly: Live free or die. If you can't say what you want on a platform, find another. Never let yourself be muzzled over money.
 
Sorry Nick, but your expressions are too meme worthy.
KF REKIETA.jpg
 
Last edited:
Also the weasel lawyer-talk is getting tiresome. Everyone knows what "the wall" means.
There's also a difference between a legal issue wrt speech and a terms of service violation wrt speech. Nick's saying troons "belong on the wall" (or whatever the exact phrasing is), is legal speech in the U.S. It could at the same time be speech which violates YouTube's/ Google's / Alphabet's TOS, whether determined to be threatening, hateful, too colorful on a Wednesday, etc.

But I agree, the teehee edgelord shit with the wall is a losing argument.
 
Back