- Joined
- Jan 1, 2022
A good bit of Nick's income comes from Youtube, I assume.
If he doesn't get his yt back he will likely stream a bit still but he will have to lawyer again. No way to make the bank he was on tiny platforms.
I wouldn't say that. Nick's streams are his main source of income. He hasn't actually lawyered in a while, and when he was lawyering (while also doing his nightly shows) he was charging very little or going full pro bono.
So this ban is substantially hitting his ability to feed/house/clothe himself and his family.
on his stream with dax last night, at the 1:27:30 mark, nick mentioned that his he's been streaming on twitch "and the income on those streams has been comparable to youtube streams." and that was before his youtube ban. add that to his income from locals, odysee, and rumble (with 26,000 viewers last night), and i think he'll be alright financially.
this is interesting to me because it illustrates keffals paranoia. there are different ways to interpret what nick said, but he did not say "and shot". that is what keffals heard, but it isn't what he said. he has plausible deniability in this.
it's already been pointed out itt that the phrases "on the wall" or "up against the wall" can be interpreted any number of ways. nick clarified that it was a reference to "removing these individuals from society". someone else said they thought it referred to mugshots and / or a police line-up. someone else said it was a literary refence to the haidmaid's tale. someone else posted an urban dictionary definition of a sex act. personally, when i hear either phrase, what first comes to mind is the stop-and-frisk technique the police use to literally force suspects against a wall to search them. i know that's not what nick meant, but the fact is, people hear what they want to hear, and what they hear often reveals what they want the truth to be. keffals wants to believe that someone opposing him is a lethal threat. but it's not.