The Kerch bridge was an actual target (pic related from a few months ago), the attack on it had minimal cassualties (only 3 people died) and ziggers retaliate by bombing multiple cities instead of military targets. Now you tell me which attack had the worst optics and importance.
Given the trains were running fine by evening while the internet hoholiat already have power outages in downtown Kyyv I think we both know what had more importance. But it's fine, I'm sure Putler's all out of missiles this time.
The route that was giving military supplies to the russian troops who had just been pushed back in the previous offensive?
Back to being disingenuous; the image I posted isn't of the Kerch Bridge, those were Russian ethnic civilians of Kupyansk murdered by the Ukronazis that they themselves posted to Telegram yesterday.
t.me
t.me
t.me
Never happened.
Bombing a capital city isn't a good tactical play? What an utterly retarded take from an utter retard.
Ah yes, bombing pedestrian bridges is the most tactical play.
You replied to my post first about military targets with something unrelated, try harder.
Ah I see, when the Ukroschweinen murder civilians, those are legit military targets but when Russia takes out the European Union "advisory" building next to the tourist bridge and it's colateral damage, it's practically a war crime. Tell, did you cry this hard when the US destroyed Iraq's infrastructure over faked intelligence, killing hundreds of innocent civilians in the process?
Maybe they can raise money to rebuild with a postage stamp or something, but let's be honest, they will jsut beg the west to give them more money.
When you have troops that need it elsewhere, it really isn't. Good at showing that you're psychopath invaders though.
Sorry are you trying to imply this leaves them broke? Because, I'm pretty sure Russia has lost god knows how many billions in armor being blown up alone.
lmfao, so basically this is all for show.
