No, they haven't. Have they really went full-on Grozny on Mariupol the city itself would've looked like an entire Post-Apocalypse set, minus irradiated areas.
Did you look at pictures of Mariupol?
I don't expect you to be wise or honest, you never was.
RFAF military were hands tied to minimal civil and infrastructure damage policy. This directive was off on few occasions, I expect the full lift off to happen.
How were their hands tied? They repeatedly used Iskander and Kalibr missiles against cities, the water infrastructure in East Ukraine was destroyed and residents had to drink from puddles, and there was widespread use of cluster munitions in indescriminate fashion.
Again, by your logic ukrainians should feel the same way toward America but they are not.
And probably never will, it's quite complicated matter bound to historical relationships and life paths.
Why? Ukrainians have been fighting this fight before America was independent.
Ukrainians are asking for weapons. There's enough of them who want to fight. If none of them wanted to fight, the US wouldn't be able to do anything about it.
The DPR and LPR ravaged their male population in this nonsense, though.
The more materiel you imbeciles will send, the futher it will escalate and more time it will take to end completely, and less of a chance for peaceful regulation and full decimation of Ukraine, which is the goal of both sides, to a certain point.
The more materiel we send, the fighting will end sooner. Russia escalated things to 100 in Feb 24. You cannot twist a victim fighting back as an escalation.
They do, and they always end up in consensus in which they winners and losers reach agreements on terms of the triumphant. Every war existed in, at the very least, last 5 centuries, have ended up by reaching the common ground and agreements between adversaries, after long and bloody battles. This war is not an exclusion from the rule no matter how much you retard boomers want so to be one. This war will end by reaching understanding and agreements that will be discussed between the victor and the fallen.
Jesus now you're confusing negotiated settlements with capitulations. And ignoring how conflicts can just end through ceasing of hostilities.
What common ground did North Vietnam and the US reach? None.
What common ground did Hitler and the Allies reach? None.
The war is not an exclusion from the rule, but you don't know what the rule even is. There a spectrum of ways wars have ended, from full blown capitulation to one side simply abandoning the fight and not signing shit. There's wars that never officially ended but the fighting is over.
