Hi,
I'm emailing you regarding an ethics complaint filed under my name a while ago to the minnesota state bar, with regards to commetns made about Clara Kefflas Sorrenti. I forgot about it until I received a letter about it yesterday in the mail. The complaint was made with limited information available against Sorrenti, as the prevailing narrative was that she was the unequivocal victim and any accusations and any accusations made against her were false. As well as the assumption that your comments may have constituted death wishes. And since then I and many others have seen other perspectives brought to light and gained prominence, including but not limited to Steve Destiny Bonnell's lengthy stream, going in depth about the controversies surrounding Sorrenti, as well as her various lies, suspect actions, etc. As such, I wish to apologize personally for filing an ethics complaintm and also apologize for doing so so late. I realize it may come across as insincere, but I was genuinely unaware of Sorrenti's own behavior, chalking up criticisms of her & accusations made against her wholly to defamation. I'd hoped that the fact they decided an investigation wasn't necessary and the fact that myself and potentially more complainants may have come to terms with the truth surrounding Sorrenti should be enough to let bygones be bygones. But it was brought to my attention that you intend to publicize my & the other complainants' names and addresses on your creators page on locals. I can't speak for everyone else but the complaints were made under the impression that the details given would not be made public, especially given the guidelines on reporting ethical misconduct were stated to not be public per this webpage "and then they cite the webpage," Question: Are complaints against lawyers public? A: The general rule is that complaints against lawyers are not public. Investigation files are not available except the lawyer. Parts of the file may be disclosed when necessary for investigation. One exception to this rule is Supreme Court filings trials and hearings on serious matters which are open to the public. I myself am not a public figure and would rather remain on the internet with a sense of comfortable anonymity, especially considering users of Kiwi Farms have posted my name, photos & information on your thread on their website and are threatening to hand the information over to more malicious actors who would have the capability to leak information like my social security number, details about my family, etc. "Link to the Kiwi Farms post" I cannot begin to express the supreme lack of foresight I myself had when doing this, especially when the information may have been made public anyway had action been taken against you and had I known today what I know now about keffals I absolutely never would have filed an ethics complaint. "But wait, did you notice the contradiction there? I'll read that again: especially when the information may have been made public anyway had action been taken against you. Wait a minute, you cited earlier that you didn't think it would be public because you listed that Q&A but it said, if actions were taken against me information would have been released. So what's the story here? Which one of those is true? I don't know? Hmmm. Hmm. Anyway..." And had I known what I know today about keffals I absolutely never would have filed an ethics complaint. I suppose I was riding the high of being a massive SJW that I failed to realize that attempting to rob another man of his livelihood is an absolute ethical wrong, moreso than any angry comments made about someone online who's done a lot of lying and manipulation to their audience. I distanced myself from keffals awhile ago and in good faith, I would like to ask that you not only refrain from posting my unredacted information on your Locals page but you also refrain from posting the unredacted information of the other complainants on your locals page, given the gravity of the threats made by the Kiwi Farms forum and the questionable nature of posting information such as home addresses of individuals to the internet to an audience who may have malicious intent. I don't believe the punishment would fit the crime on our part.... Jason Durkadurkastan (Jason H Derakhshan)
The rest is the same as what was posted earlier in thread.
rekietalaw.locals.com
