Waukesha, WI, Parade Vehicle Attack - Suspect is Darrell Edward Brooks, currently in custody.

[LaxerBRO]

Now the suspect is trying to use the COVID excuse to delay the trial.

 

[Hexadecimal]

Post lunch break update:
>judge read off all of the charges
>jury left
>brooks said one of the jurors flipped him off
>argued with the judge about his 1st amendment rights
>judge is fed the fuck up and sent him out
I've never seen someone attempt to use pure uneducated and insufferable nigger persistence to try to win a court case

 

[LaxerBRO]

Post lunch break update:
>judge read off all of the charges
>jury left
>brooks said one of the jurors flipped him off
>argued with the judge about his 1st amendment rights
>judge is fed the fuck up and sent him out
I've never seen someone attempt to use pure uneducated and insufferable nigger persistence to try to win a court case

The judge needs to put a shock belt on the defendant.

 

[Trapped Under Rice]

A skillful and eloquent defense from Brooks today. It's not looking good for Wisconsin. Pigs are no doubt seething and furiously fabricating evidence as we speak. They can't keep a rhetorical philosopher kang like Brooks down. MLK 2 right here. Low IQ nigger legal theories are my new favorite thing since I found out about low IQ nigger pseudohistory.

 

[Day of the Cope]

Sinking his own ship? Huh?

Shooting his mouth off at the judge while trying to represent himself.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

Naturally, the prosecutors are trying to pretend that Brooks was just trying to get away from a domestic dispute. Nice way to justify not laying hate crimes charges.

After audio and other issues had been resolved late in the morning, the prosecution requested that potential victim-witnesses not be shown on the video stream because Brooks’ general behavior during cross-examination could further victimize them emotionally. The move would also ensure that the public wouldn’t see the long list of White victims that Brooks allegedly targeted, thus making it easier to minimize the anti-White hate motive...

late in the day, the prosecution gave its opening statement. It was straightforward but studiously avoided any mention of Brooks’ extensive, documented history of anti-White statements and hate.

A troubling harbinger of the state’s approach, Assistant District Attorney Zachary Witchow said that jurors will hear witnesses that will establish that “As the body count increased, so did Brooks’ motivation to escape,” suggesting that will be the state’s main narrative, rather than Brooks’ racial motives.

 

[The Piscine Pope]

I suspect its more that the prosecution wants the easiest path to conviction. If they try to prove the obvious racial motive, they run the risk of some jury member being a closet BLM supporter who'll get upset that someone is showing that minorities can be racist. Whatever reason they say he had, his sentence would be the same, but this way the state runs less risk of random jury nullifications drawing it out.

 

[Flaming Insignias]

I suspect its more that the prosecution wants the easiest path to conviction. If they try to prove the obvious racial motive, they run the risk of some jury member being a closet BLM supporter who'll get upset that someone is showing that minorities can be racist. Whatever reason they say he had, his sentence would be the same, but this way the state runs less risk of random jury nullifications drawing it out.

That's wishful thinking, but running with the “panicked fleeing” narrative allows Brooks to plead down by arguing that at least some of the injuries were accidental rather than conscious acts of violence against white pedestrians motivated by racial hatred. Of course, nobody tried this with Charlotesville, which was an actual riot, so the double standards are even more egregious.

 

[King Possum]

... allows Brooks to plead down.

He ran over 70+ people, what exactly would he plead down to?

 

[FamicomGorby]

This fukin trial getting better and better. Someone needs to tell him what hearsay means.

 

[Noble Redditor]

Why does he keep saying "no, I do no it understand"?

I know it's a sovereign citizen thing but what's the point?

 

[draggs]

Post lunch break update:
>judge read off all of the charges
>jury left
>brooks said one of the jurors flipped him off
>argued with the judge about his 1st amendment rights
>judge is fed the fuck up and sent him out
I've never seen someone attempt to use pure uneducated and insufferable nigger persistence to try to win a court case

ngl I appreciate someone not giving a fuck about judges thinking they are little tin gods inside the courtroom even though it's a feral nog who should've had his junk cut off and jammed down his throat a long ass time ago

 

[FamicomGorby]

Current defense he seems to be going with is "It wasn't me, but also if it was the car was honking its horn so it's not the driver's fault people didn't get out of the way."

GROUNDS!?!

 

[The Piscine Pope]

Watching this guy sit there and ask all these inane questions to one of his victims is infuriating. The judge and prosecutors really need to wrangle him better.

 

[FamicomGorby]

Watching this guy sit there and ask all these inane questions to one of his victims is infuriating. The judge and prosecutors really need to wrangle him better.

I can only hope the jury aren't a bunch of dumbasses and are just as mad.

 

[Glass House]

Watching this guy sit there and ask all these inane questions to one of his victims is infuriating. The judge and prosecutors really need to wrangle him better.

This is just odd to see him ask his victims questions. I also can't believe the victims aren't saying "When YOU hit me" they are just saying "The red SUV hit me". I hope that one of them is combative with him, it's not like anyone will hold it against them.

I think that the cross exam of the band teacher will be interesting

 

[Dan Abrams]

GROUNDS

 

[Mikoyan]

GROUNDS

I'm wondering where he learned his new magic word.

 

[Fat Gay Riker]

Why does he keep saying "no, I do no it understand"?

I know it's a sovereign citizen thing but what's the point?

The thinking is they don't "stand under" the court, and are equals to it. It's beyond retarded semantics but that's sov-cits for you.

 

[Mikoyan]

The thinking is they don't "stand under" the court, and are equals to it. It's beyond retarded semantics but that's sov-cits for you.

Yeah, a lot of sovcit theory is like the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal. "If you don't recognize or agree to the legal system you are outside it."