US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

 

[The Last Stand]

Hey, take what you can. Tulsi has a good head on her shoulders. Don't expect immediate change as the odds will be against her.

Now if Hillary starts tussling with Tulsi, then we have something interesting to witness.

 

[Breadbassket]

There's nothing wrong with sensible gun control. I doubt Tulsi will be up in arms to TAKE your arms. She's a military vet.

You do you but personally I oppose any gun control politicians on the basis that while even in the most conservative of cases they want to limit things a tiny bit, over time it still accomplishes the same goal over a long period of time after enough legislation is passed. Its just gradual instead of all at once.

Think of the 2nd Amendment as the metaphorical gun of the people. Over time as new laws are passed, a bit of that gun is disassembled and taken away. In the end there will be nothing left then the government can do whatever they wish as well as criminals who didn't ever adhere to the law in the first place.

 

[The Last Stand]

You do you but personally I oppose any gun control politicians on the basis that while even in the most conservative of cases they want to limit things a tiny bit, over time it still accomplishes the same goal over a long period of time after enough legislation is passed. Its just gradual instead of all at once.

Think of the 2nd Amendment as the metaphorical gun of the people. Over time as new laws are passed, a bit of that gun is dissembled and taken away. In the end there will be nothing left then the government can do whatever they wish.

Gun control was tried before. See Chicago. It didn't stop people from shooting each other every damn day. Make it a federal law to oppose gun rights.

 

[xXx: State of the Union]

Gun control was tried before. See Chicago. It didn't stop people from shooting each other every damn day. Make it a federal law to oppose gun rights.

So which is it? Gun control or no?

 

[The Last Stand]

So which is it? Gun control or no?

No. I don't want America to end up like Chicago.

 

[Car Won't Crank]

I would say that it would be more environmentally conscientious to get rid of the cruise ship industry, since no useful cargo is being transported between countries (unlike with cargo ships), not to mention the illegal dumping of sewage in open international waters. It's just a vanity thing for people to barely experience lots of cities in a relatively short amount of time and look at open water for hours on end. The problem lies therein that the interconnected tourist industries (especially on smaller port towns which doesn't see much non-cruise traffic otherwise) and services, would suffer a sharp decline and thousands of people would be without jobs.

It's incredible just how lavish and energy intensive those massive cruise ships are. Even medium sized cruise ships are ridiculous. They're probably one of the biggest products of wasteful consumerism we have now. I still like the sheer mechanics and engineering that goes into those ships though. The movie WallE was right in using the cruise ship style life on board the AI controlled space ship to show humanity's laziness and wastefulness.

 

[xXx: State of the Union]

Hey, take what you can. Tulsi has a good head on her shoulders. Don't expect immediate change as the odds will be against her.

I mean, I don't have to take anything. Tulsi political career is over, all she has now is a job as a talking head on Fox and possibly becoming some kind of influencer to military/LEO youtube crowd.

I'm less shitting on Tulsi at this point and more shitting on retards who will suddenly give her money and attention despite her working actively against them in the past.

 

[The Man With No Name]

Hey, take what you can. Tulsi has a good head on her shoulders. Don't expect immediate change as the odds will be against her.

Now if Hillary starts tussling with Tulsi, then we have something interesting to witness.

I'll give Tulsi this - she really (or the group controlling her) hates troons.

 

[AnotherPleb]

There's nothing wrong with sensible gun control. I doubt Tulsi will be up in arms to TAKE your arms. She's a military vet.

Sensible gun control over the years is how we got where we are now.

Shall. Not. Be. Infringed.

No. I don't want America to end up like Chicago.

Then enforce what is on the books. What's that? Criminals don't follow laws? And areas with the strictest laws against guns have the most issues with violent crimes involving guns?

If you want America to not end up like Chicago then look at what Chicago is doing and do the exact opposite.

 

[The Last Stand]

I'll give Tulsi this - she really (or the group controlling her) hates troons.

Man, everybody hates troons. They did it to themselves.

I can understand arguments against fracking, especially when it heavily pollutes the groundwater that ordinary citizens drink (and now can light on fire thanks to the gas being leached into the water supply). However, I don't think there are a lot of legitimate reasons to not domestically drill.

In such an event, it would be a massive scandal for the company AND thee government if they do not act accordingly. Of course, the solution isn't to limit fossil fuel usage but to have appropriate regulation for the wellbeing of the public.

Remember bp with that oil spill? It costs more to be reckless than it is to be careful.

 

[Kermit Jizz]

No. I don't want America to end up like Chicago.

I think you might not like where that road leads.

 

[Dr. Ricearoni]

Now if Hillary starts tussling with Tulsi, then we have something interesting to witness.

They aren't gonna mud wrestle in bikinis if that's what you're hoping for.

 

[AnotherPleb]

They aren't gonna mud wrestle in bikinis if that's what you're hoping for.

Why you gotta crush @The Last Stand and @JosephStalin like that?

 

[KingLiberty76]

View attachment 3730106
View attachment 3730108

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1579788950696185859 (Archive)

View attachment 3730109

View attachment 3730126

one thing i'm shocked about is the fact the usual suspects (Brooklyndad, LIndy Li) haven't said anything about this, however Ron Filipkowski has though

 

[pwnest injun]

Tulsi is one of the few people in government who seems capable of changing her mind as new information becomes available.

 

[Gehenna]

Tulsi is what I'd refer to as a 'soft globalist', so I am skeptical of any stance she takes but not inherently opposed to her. While she was in the same group as people like One-Eye, she didn't suck at the teat quite so hard. She aligns philosophically with their side and the WEF did what it does with any potential recruit and groomed her as best they could. That is the purpose of that little group. Not to manufacture from whole cloth but to mold an existing bias further toward their image.

The result for Tulsi is that she leans towards the WEF agenda but is not solely consumed or reliant on it. The question is how much will the WEF supporting things like the Ukrainian war clash with her other ideals.

 

[The Last Stand]

If Tulsi was older, she'd definitely have my vote.

 

[WeDon'tNeedToWhisper]

How old/new are you guys? Stop plane my name, put some respek on it, all tree of ya'll. Ya'll done or ya'll finished?

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

If Tulsi was older, she'd definitely have my vote.

If Tulsi was older, you’d be the type to then say that she’s not as old as Hilary or Chelsea.

 

[Vyse Inglebard]

Think of the 2nd Amendment as the metaphorical gun of the people. Over time as new laws are passed, a bit of that gun is disassembled and taken away. In the end there will be nothing left then the government can do whatever they wish as well as criminals who didn't ever adhere to the law in the first place.