Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
Too many of you are forming a parasocial obsession with Rekieta, and this purity testing the other law Youtubers is pathetic.

Fact: Rekieta is a LOLCow. There is a thread about him on an anime forum called "Kiwi Farms."

He is a unique mix of Christian conservative and 4Chan shitposter. The more prim and proper lawyers are not going to follow him to the ends of the earth.

The cock-eyed guy in Korea (Legal Mindset) who is making videos about which of them are loyal is just hoping to pick up some grift crumbs from the grift king.
Darrel Brooks (2).png
 
Really the worst thing about her is the expression, and isn't she in her mid 30's or early 40's? She looks good for her age compared to most women.
Weeb Wars lore, but I still laugh that this woman is just about 40, has squeezed five children out of her uterus, has to do mom stuff for those five kids, and still looks presentable.

Meanwhile Monica Rial is only a few years older, no kids to balloon the physique, has all the free time in the world since all she does is voice act and sign autographs, yet she looks like a landwhale.
 
Stream tonight


 
My drunk eyes though that was Nick with a clean shave and some longer hair and a nose ring.
Married couples start to look like each other over time. It's pretty well documented and is usually attributed to facial mirroring... I don't fully buy it but they work out the same face muscles and get the same wrinkles?
 
What forum is this? Resetera?
I know I'm late and gay on this, but it's knockout.chat. The remnants of Facepunch. It is an absolute SHIT SHOW of a forum. They absolutely loathe when anyone points out their hipocrisy. Good for a laugh if you love to laugh at far left tranny ridden delusional trainwrecks.
 
You know, Rekieta's wife would've probably done herself some favors too if she didn't film while standing in the windswept dunes of the mojave desert or wherever the fuck she is. Then she wouldn't have to squint so much and the whole process would be easier. Just a suggestion.

She does look good for her age though.
 
Viva is having nick on tonight to discuss his ban and other stuff. Seems like a clear sign of support in the Lawtube Civil War.

Youtube link
Nick says he's the YouTube expert when nobodies offer him unsolicited advice, but in his talk with Viva, he said he thought the mob wouldn't be able to strike his livestream if he just deleted it afterward. Viva knew. TUG knows. How Nick didn't is amazing.

And because he deleted it, he is now unable to appeal that strike.
 
Last edited:
Too many of you are forming a parasocial obsession with Rekieta, and this purity testing the other law Youtubers is pathetic.

Fact: Rekieta is a LOLCow. There is a thread about him on an anime forum called "Kiwi Farms."

He is a unique mix of Christian conservative and 4Chan shitposter. The more prim and proper lawyers are not going to follow him to the ends of the earth.

The cock-eyed guy in Korea (Legal Mindset) who is making videos about which of them are loyal is just hoping to pick up some grift crumbs from the grift king.
When he goes on the midlife crisis sex shit I cringe, but Nick isn't a full-on lolcow. He typically can be told he's a retard and will take the criticism. He gets some benefit on being a cow because he's one of the few people who will bat for the website.
I think his legal commentary shtick is good because he's willing to take the faggotry out of legal commentary. He's not stuck up on law being something almost holy, he's got a good personality to riff on shit. A lot of the other lawyers kinda suck on their own, but are fun as a panel because they can offer some neat perspectives.

People here will still call him a lolbert faggot, know he's on thin ice, a shitty laywer, an actual faggot, or that one guy who says he has AIDS. For the most part, Nick has been morally consistent to that. He's not impeccable in that moral, but expecting moral impeccability is fucking retarded.
 
Nick says he's the YouTube expert when nobodies offer him unsolicited advice, but in his talk with Viva, he said he thought the mob wouldn't be able to strike his livestream if he just deleted it afterward. Viva knew. TUG knows. How Nick didn't is amazing.

And because he deleted it, he is now unable to appeal that strike.
What a retard. Maybe the problem with the unsolicited advice was that it was too complex for him.
 
Too many of you are forming a parasocial obsession with Rekieta, and this purity testing the other law Youtubers is pathetic.

Fact: Rekieta is a LOLCow. There is a thread about him on an anime forum called "Kiwi Farms."

He is a unique mix of Christian conservative and 4Chan shitposter. The more prim and proper lawyers are not going to follow him to the ends of the earth.

The cock-eyed guy in Korea (Legal Mindset) who is making videos about which of them are loyal is just hoping to pick up some grift crumbs from the grift king.
Ma'am, this isn't your tumblr blog. Please stop shitting up the thread by using terms you saw on social media but don't understand.
 
When he goes on the midlife crisis sex shit I cringe, but Nick isn't a full-on lolcow. He typically can be told he's a retard and will take the criticism. He gets some benefit on being a cow because he's one of the few people who will bat for the website.
I think his legal commentary shtick is good because he's willing to take the faggotry out of legal commentary. He's not stuck up on law being something almost holy, he's got a good personality to riff on shit. A lot of the other lawyers kinda suck on their own, but are fun as a panel because they can offer some neat perspectives.

People here will still call him a lolbert faggot, know he's on thin ice, a shitty laywer, an actual faggot, or that one guy who says he has AIDS. For the most part, Nick has been morally consistent to that. He's not impeccable in that moral, but expecting moral impeccability is fucking retarded.
And yet people still do which is why so many people are such fucked up hypocrites. I put more stock in people being good in spite of their flaws than because of their lack of them. That said, there are things that I disagree with Nick on, for example him being on Infowars because I see Alex Jones as a complete nutter that is a cancer on the side of reason and there are people that are far better at doing his job. But that isn't reason enough for me to unfollow Nick. That would require him going full Lolcow, becoming a thin skinned bitch or crossing lines.
 
Nick says he's the YouTube expert when nobodies offer him unsolicited advice, but in his talk with Viva, he said he thought the mob wouldn't be able to strike his livestream if he just deleted it afterward. Viva knew. TUG knows. How Nick didn't is amazing.

And because he deleted it, he is now unable to appeal that strike.
Nick's YouTube expertise is that he's struck on a magical formula for getting autists to send him superberries. As for the more technical aspects of YouTube however he's shockingly retarded. He has no use for all those "YouTube experts" trying to tell him how to make thumbnails and titles. He doesn't even use OBS.

His expertise is very niche because he's managed to find a way to make livestreaming work and be hugely profitable on a platform where all of the other experts will tell you how to make short-form videos that get wide distribution in the algorithm. And that's fine too, it's just a different type of content.

Ironically, by switching his YouTube format to a clips channel, he's actually now going to have to adopt the status quo. Gotta get those clips distributed and hopefully get new viewers who he can convince to come to Rumble for the long-form content. YouTube is just too pozzed for the spicy live streams, and Nick isn't willing to muzzle himself to the degree he'd have to to avoid getting his channel yeeted again when some non-English-speaking first-line support team at YouTube has to review a 7-hour livestream from a bunch of tranny faggots claiming that Nick issued death threats.
 
Back