Star Wars Griefing Thread (SPOILERS) - Safety off

It's pretty funny to see how many people want to bring real-world baggage and cynicism to an escapist fantasy.
Another huge problem is that the original target audience who were kids in the 80s at one point grew up and expected Star Wars to grow up with them in so much as becoming more cynical and downbeat by reality, when a large part of SW is being a story that can resonate with who Lucas calls "young people". Disney's shit is giving the manchildren exactly what they want. Again, don't these manchildren know they make movies for adults? Or do they just wanna soyface about Star Wars for the rest of their lives?
Lucas is a good director. He understands how to set up a shot, and use visuals. He also knows how to set up a theme and deliver on it.
I believe that if AOTC was shot today with modern cameras and had modern CGI it would be one of the best looking Star Wars films. Instead it looks like a daytime soap opera with PS2 cutscene graphics because the cameras/technology they used were just way too primitive.
He's even described himself as "The King of Wooden Dialogue", so he's aware of it at the very least.

Funny thing is, I have vivid memories of quoting Revenge of the Sith with friends at school, because we thought that the film had an endless supply of cool lines like "My powers have doubled since we last met" and "You Fool! I've been trained in your Jedi arts by COUNT DOOKU".

So that script must've done something right. Or maybe we were just complete dorks at school...both are entirely possible.
But my man cannot write dialogue to save his goddamn life.
George's writing can be awkward as shit with moments of greatness. One of the few good things Lawrence Kasdan did for SW was write the dialogue and give it more polish while still feeling like Star Wars, but that guy needs to stay the hell away from the actual story. AOTC also had a co-writer too but it was some guy who's name I can't remember and that no one has heard from before or since.

One of my problems is that in Disney Wars none of the characters talk the way they do in George's Star Wars, which was in a very specific way. Very much not like modern people on our world do. Now everyone sounds like fucking MCU character.
 
The talk about Tolkien and Grey Jedi makes me realize the biggest problem with modern storytelling is the either emotional or political refusal to have a clear good that isn't a blatant real world parallel.
It depends. With the Jedi Order, they're good, but they're not the wisest. As in, they're flawed good. Grey Jedi are mostly just posers who whine about both sides yet accomplish little on their own. Kreia and Jolee were pretty much just hanging around until Revan and the Exile came along, and they just mooched off those two.

It's the 13 year old idea that everything sucks so nothing is allowed to be called good, except for your mary sue who is allowed to say fuck you to every faction, and is above morality.
That's pretty much the problem some people have with Ahsoka. Although I haven't seen her shit-talk the Rebellion/New Republic, so that's an exception. Especially since she worked for them in the new lore. So maybe she's a Rebellion/New Republic simp now?

Another huge problem is that the original target audience who were kids in the 80s at one point grew up and expected Star Wars to grow up with them in so much as becoming more cynical and downbeat by reality, when a large part of SW is being a story that can resonate with who Lucas calls "young people". Disney's shit is giving the manchildren exactly what they want. Again, don't these manchildren know they make movies for adults? Or do they just wanna soyface about Star Wars for the rest of their lives?
That pretty much is why some parts of the EU and some of the new Disney canon today decided to go for the cynical route. The fans grew up, and having this standard GI Joe storyline of clear-cut good vs. evil just wouldn't cut it for them.

But to be fair, some of the best Star Wars content did draw upon that kind of cynicism and maturity to add flavor to the story. KOTOR 2, for instance, was very pessimistic. You're one of the few remaining Jedi after the war, people are hopeless and depressed, a lot of folks hate your guts and see all Force-users as trouble, the Sith are still out there killing people, many lives were destroyed by the war and those that survived are still struggling to make a living, but it's how you deal with that darkness that counts.

And of course, lots of stories featuring Imperial characters as the POV guys were obviously very dark, as in, you have a villain protagonist as the main character, and they navigate things like power politics and the use of brutality with their usual flair, usually dealing with naive hero-types and crushing the fuck out of them and their dreams. Dark Lord: Rise of Darth Vader and Darth Vader: The Lost Command deal with this. Garoche Tarkin and Olee Starstone both fight against the titular Dark Lord because they have an idealistic view of the universe (Olee wants to find other Jedi and rebuild the Jedi Order, Garoche wants to run away from daddy with his new alien girlfriend because daddy and his friends are meanies) and Vader crushes their hopes and dreams like crushing a bug.

I believe that if AOTC was shot today with modern cameras and had modern CGI it would be one of the best looking Star Wars films. Instead it looks like a daytime soap opera with PS2 cutscene graphics because the cameras/technology they used were just way too primitive.
I don't remember people complaining about that when it first came out. Sure, they were bored shitless with the soap opera part, but the CGI parts and the battles were well-received. In fact, the duel between Dooku and Yoda had the crowds cheering when they first saw it on opening night. People were bored for a good part of the film, but the final battle had them leaving the theater with huge smiles on their faces and them wanting to see it again.

George's writing can be awkward as shit with moments of greatness. One of the few good things Lawrence Kasdan did for SW was write the dialogue and give it more polish while still feeling like Star Wars, but that guy needs to stay the hell away from the actual story. AOTC also had a co-writer too but it was some guy who's name I can't remember and that no one has heard from before or since.
That's because Kasdan was good at polishing the dialogue, not making the actual story.

One of my problems is that in Disney Wars none of the characters talk the way they do in George's Star Wars, which was in a very specific way. Very much not like modern people on our world do. Now everyone sounds like fucking MCU character.
Well, that's because the modern audience are MCU fans. So no shit, they would tailor these films and shows to appeal to that kind of goomba, because that's where the money is. With Disney, it's a money game, just like almost everything is for most big corporations.

I remember a conversation in the Amazon TV show The Boys which sums it up well:

Butcher: "So it's just business then, is it?"

Stan Edgar: "When in history, Mr. Butcher, has it ever been about anything else?"
 
@LORD IMPERATOR
It depends. With the Jedi Order, they're good, but they're not the wisest. As in, they're flawed good.
The problem isn't that Good doesn't need to be free of faults, but the insistence that it's primarily motivated out of self interest means, rather than it being good for goodness sake, and at worst hampered by its members disagreeing on the best course of action, or a few bad apples.

Edit: for example, in the OT the new republic is good out of the sole reason of going against a terrifying regime, in the sequel trilogy you have scenes like the Casino planet where you are told they are all parts of the military industrial complex (that was never alluded to, and ignored afterward).
 
@LORD IMPERATOR

The problem isn't that Good doesn't need to be free of faults, but the insistence that it's primarily motivated out of self interest means, rather than it being good for goodness sake, and at worst hampered by its members disagreeing on the best course of action, or a few bad apples.
Self-interest? The Jedi are the least self-interested group in the main film series. If anything, they didn't have the balls to seize the power the way Palpatine did. They just bent over and let the Senate drive them, and they only had minor concerns about the Chancellor that they acted upon way too late. The problem with the Jedi was that they lacked decisiveness and compassion in some regards; they should have been more compassionate towards Anakin, and they should have done more to prevent the Republic from falling into corruption. But that doesn't remove the fact that most of what the Jedi do is good.

Edit: for example, in the OT the new republic is good out of the sole reason of going against a terrifying regime, in the sequel trilogy you have scenes like the Casino planet where you are told they are all parts of the military industrial complex (that was never alluded to, and ignored afterward).
The OT didn't have the New Republic, it was just the Rebellion. And they rebelled for a number of reasons, but the cut content showed that they were rebelling because the Empire used the guise of nationalization to seize private property. Which explains why some nobles and peasants wound up in a revolution against the Emperor. That, and the Empire did blow up Alderaan, so opposing that kind of inhumanity was the core principle of the Alliance.
 
Last edited:
Self-interest? The Jedi are the least self-interested group in the main film series. If anything, they didn't have the balls to seize the power the way Palpatine did. They just bent over and let the Senate drive them, and they only had minor concerns about the Chancellor that they acted upon way too late. The problem with the Jedi was that they lacked decisiveness and compassion in some regards; they should have been more compassionate towards Anakin, and they should have done more to prevent the Republic from falling into corruption. But that doesn't remove the fact that most of what the Jedi do is good.
I think I said it backwards, the modern cynical view is that there is no good and it's only a facade to mask a group's self interest. ie, the fan interpretation the Jedi Order was corrupt and arrogant, rather than it was Anakin that just couldn't let go of his attachments.
 
I think I said it backwards, the modern cynical view is that there is no good and it's only a facade to mask a group's self interest. ie, the fan interpretation the Jedi Order was corrupt and arrogant, rather than it was Anakin that just couldn't let go of his attachments.
If the Jedi were corrupt, they'd at least be trying to get some kickbacks from the government. You'd at least see Jedi driving around in designer cars, wearing robes of solid gold, with gold-plated lightsabers and ornaments hanging on their necks, or maybe some really expensive gilded armor made of rare metals. Arrogant? Yes, we see that a lot. Stodgy, set in their ways? Sure. You can even argue that eradicating them was a net positive for Force-users as a whole since now, they were free to explore both the Light and the Dark. But they at least had good intentions at heart. The modern cynical view comes from fans who willingly misinterpret what they see.
 
Another huge problem is that the original target audience who were kids in the 80s at one point grew up and expected Star Wars to grow up with them
Which is why anyone with that expectation shouldn't flock to the films...they should flock to the Expanded Universe instead. The films are the escapist bedrock for all staple concepts of the franchise, and Lucas intended for them to be that way--to have the melodrama of familial sagas and the allusions to mythology and history be a gateway of accessibility for its intended audience. That's the purpose they serve.

The EU, by contrast, was not written for the sensibilities for the wider audience Lucas handcuffed himself to; it was written first and foremost for adults. Fans who were still hungering for more adventures in that universe, that would go beyond the simplicity of the films. That's precisely why large-event novel series like New Jedi Order, Legacy of the Force, and Fate of the Jedi are all written with a far more mature slant. Philosophical questions held more weight. Conflicts were greyer, and eschewed space opera heroics for gritty military sci-fi. Violence was more graphic and shocking. Sexual implications were far less subtle. Heroes were saddled with far more harrowing emotional dilemmas, and the "fairy tale" nature of the films wasn't present to aide them through their worst experiences. NJO in particular takes the younger generation of Jedi Heroes, including the Solo Children, and drags them out of their cozy Padawan lifestyles into the harsh depths of interstellar war...forcing them to grow up overnight to cope with the trauma of battle, and the sudden brutal deaths of those around them. It's the kind of thing that would never be in the films, because the books don't have to worry about alienating a wider audience--these books were, ostensibly, the R-Rated HBO Miniseries continuation of the OT, and tackled a lot of the things that jaded adult Star Wars fans bash the films for never tackling. Which is why I personally don't share a lot of their aggravation for the films "having never grown up", because the wider supplementary material was already shouldering the burden of blazing that trail of maturity...sometimes telling a better story than the films themselves, but always respectfully, using the simplistic elements of the films as a starting point, rather than something they needed to "fix."

This is the beauty of SW as it was back before Disney, is that the universe and the creators operating within it had the freedom to cater to multiple demographics. The books and comics could push the boundary of creativity, and offer the nuance and depth that the films often had to shy away from to retain Lucas' intended simplicity.

Today, the situation is the complete opposite: stories told across all mediums of Disney SW refuse to deviate from the simplicity of the films, and lack the confidence to pursue any demographic beyond the Funko Pop brigade with their books and comics. They can never be as bold or dark as the EU of the past, because every facet of the brand has to tonally match. It's why the EU continues to age like a fine wine, and why Disney's cornocopia of utterly disposable canon drek is already growing sceptic and inward, dying a slow death of irrelevance...

...and if you think I'm exaggerating, consider that High Republic is about to enter "Phase II" of its narrative, and virtually no one on Planet Earth is aware or even gives the faintest fuck.
 
wasnt there some guy who was crazy and roped a guy who was a kid in one of the ewok movies into his crazy schemes and had a thread here?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Creep3r
wasnt there some guy who was crazy and roped a guy who was a kid in one of the ewok movies into his crazy schemes and had a thread here?
Was it a tranny groomer we talked about ages ago who wears diapers and wouldn't shut up about how fans were ruining his disney experience?
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Decimator
Was it a tranny groomer we talked about ages ago who wears diapers and wouldn't shut up about how fans were ruining his disney experience?
Nah, i think it was, like, some guy had his Original Books Do Not Steal, a bunch of clear Star Wars knockoffs.
Maybe irl martial arts were involved?

The weird part was that he had a crony that was some rando who was a kid in one of the ewok movies.

iirc the duo had a thread, and at some point Grown Up Ewok Guy realized what was going on, totally denounced everything and got his participation removed from the thread's writeup after demonstrating he _really_ wasn't in the loop about the crazy guy being crazy.

Might have been a black guy mixing Jedi shit and some manner of newage motivational kungfu with maybe a hint of kangz for flavor?
 
Nah, i think it was, like, some guy had his Original Books Do Not Steal, a bunch of clear Star Wars knockoffs.
Maybe irl martial arts were involved?

The weird part was that he had a crony that was some rando who was a kid in one of the ewok movies.

iirc the duo had a thread, and at some point Grown Up Ewok Guy realized what was going on, totally denounced everything and got his participation removed from the thread's writeup after demonstrating he _really_ wasn't in the loop about the crazy guy being crazy.

Might have been a black guy mixing Jedi shit and some manner of newage motivational kungfu with maybe a hint of kangz for flavor?
Are you talking about G. K. Holand? He's the only faggot I know of who might match that description. Iirc he was the writer of those non existent and crappy Star Walker books (which were just ripoffs of the prequels and Tales) which apparently were propaganda for his cult that starred some desperate wannabe black rapper. I think he used to have some really cringy "trailers" floating around ages ago.

Only reason he's even known to me is because Aubree Miller (Cindel the girl from the ewoks movies), Mike Edmons and Warwick Davis (both ewoks) were briefly roped into his crazy shit while at a convention but then it became clear he was just using them to promote his cult rather than actually use them for his bogus movie project.
 
Last edited:
Are you talking about G. K. Holand? He's the only faggot I know of who might match that description. Iirc he was the writer of those non existent and crappy Star Walker books (which were just ripoffs of the prequels and Tales) which apparently were propaganda for his cult that starred some desperate wannabe black rapper. I think he used to have some really cringy "trailers" floating around ages ago.

Only reason he's even known to me is because Aubree Miller (Cindel the girl from the ewoks movies), Mike Edmons and Warwick Davis (both ewoks) were briefly roped into his crazy shit while at a convention but then it became clear he was just using them to promote his cult rather than actually use them for his bogus movie project.
Yeah that sounds like it's what I'm half-remembering
 
You know, hearing about the Vader comics and developing Vader's struggle prior to ROTJ, I'm gonna be honest: I think this sort of development for Vader, while it may seem like a no brainer to do (build upon elements to fuel Vader turning on Palpatine), doesn't work for Vader and Luke's story.

The climax of ROTJ is Luke's unwavering faith in his feelings and familial bond in Vader sparking a sense of humanity that Vader had long since thought was dead. Vader spends the movie telling Luke, in a perfect display of the dark side's hold, that he's given up, that he serves Palpatine not out of loyalty or profit, but because he see's no other path. Anakin Skywalker is dead, all that's left is an instrument of destruction who lost all his humanity. He turns to the light because watching his son getting tortured while still pleading for his help makes him realise that his humanity is still there, even if faint, proving that Anakin Skywalker is alive and he wants to help his son.

All of these elements become far weaker when you change it from 'Luke creates cracks in Vader's armour, both figuratively and literally, exposing Anakin for the first time in years' to 'Luke manages to get through to Anakin after years of other people already making Vader question himself and face his still beating humanity multiple times'. Makes Luke's victory feel more like he just so happened to be the hundredth customer rather than him having a admirable strength of will and hope.
 
You know, hearing about the Vader comics and developing Vader's struggle prior to ROTJ, I'm gonna be honest: I think this sort of development for Vader, while it may seem like a no brainer to do (build upon elements to fuel Vader turning on Palpatine), doesn't work for Vader and Luke's story.

The climax of ROTJ is Luke's unwavering faith in his feelings and familial bond in Vader sparking a sense of humanity that Vader had long since thought was dead. Vader spends the movie telling Luke, in a perfect display of the dark side's hold, that he's given up, that he serves Palpatine not out of loyalty or profit, but because he see's no other path. Anakin Skywalker is dead, all that's left is an instrument of destruction who lost all his humanity. He turns to the light because watching his son getting tortured while still pleading for his help makes him realise that his humanity is still there, even if faint, proving that Anakin Skywalker is alive and he wants to help his son.

All of these elements become far weaker when you change it from 'Luke creates cracks in Vader's armour, both figuratively and literally, exposing Anakin for the first time in years' to 'Luke manages to get through to Anakin after years of other people already making Vader question himself and face his still beating humanity multiple times'. Makes Luke's victory feel more like he just so happened to be the hundredth customer rather than him having a admirable strength of will and hope.
The current Marvel comics boiling Vader's character to a tactless murder machine who spends every moment of privacy sobbing into his pillow over Padme is arguably their worst offense. They even made resurrecting Padme his primary objective for an entire arc of the comic, and made that his ulterior motive in that terrible fucking Vader Immortal VR Game.
 
Back