Waukesha, WI, Parade Vehicle Attack - Suspect is Darrell Edward Brooks, currently in custody.

Who's responsible?

  • Glowies

    Votes: 196 9.4%
  • Incel

    Votes: 57 2.7%
  • Truck of Peace

    Votes: 222 10.6%
  • BLM

    Votes: 708 34.0%
  • Retaliation for Kyle's Acquittal

    Votes: 539 25.9%
  • Minceraft

    Votes: 128 6.1%
  • Alt-Right Nazi Gamergater Chud

    Votes: 108 5.2%
  • Other (please specify)

    Votes: 127 6.1%

  • Total voters
    2,085
The fact that this nigger hasn't been drug out of court and burned alive is proof that systemic racism is a hoax, that there are no packs of frothing white people outside the courthouse even, is terrorism even a thing anymore? How did he avoid that obvious charge?
 
Brooks is asking basically everyone if they could see someone in the back seat of the car. I'm looking forward to what that's leading up to, he might say that someone made him drive through the parade or he was in the car but it was his unknown twin brother that was driving.
 
Last edited:
The thinking is they don't "stand under" the court, and are equals to it. It's beyond retarded semantics but that's sov-cits for you.
So if we changed it to "do you comprehend?" Would it work better since he won't have been fed a way of breaking that into smaller words with a hidden meaning?
I'm not sure what I was envisioning, but for some reason it was less retarded than reinterpreting a word that means "able to process the meaning and consequence of the sounds other humans make" into "swearing fidelity to my sovereign power." Like they see themselves as cunningly avoiding inviting in a vampire, and therefore can't be harmed by it.
 
Why are they putting him on trial? We told black people that they can kill whites, and now we punish him for what we told him to do?

I think this is great! Darrell Brooks is a courthouse role model! Don’t agree to anything! Be a gigantic piece of shit! What Brooks should be doing is asking that white bitch why she has such a problem with black folk.
 
So if we changed it to "do you comprehend?" Would it work better since he won't have been fed a way of breaking that into smaller words with a hidden meaning?
I'm not sure what I was envisioning, but for some reason it was less retarded than reinterpreting a word that means "able to process the meaning and consequence of the sounds other humans make" into "swearing fidelity to my sovereign power." Like they see themselves as cunningly avoiding inviting in a vampire, and therefore can't be harmed by it.
They'd just continue to deny it. The vampire comparison is apt and they think it works.

In other news, the current witness, holy shit. Brooks is so lucky Wisconsin's a no-kill shelter.
 
He said something perfect this morning, he asked the judge what she meant about the sovereign citizen shit. That’s perfect! He did perfect! Claim that the court made the false assumption that brooks is a sovereign citizen! He has no idea what a sovereign citizen is! As far as he is aware, he’s a member of the community! He doesn’t think he’s outside the law, he knows he’s a part of society!

We tell niggers, every day, that whitey is evil, that whitey is to be blamed, that whitey needs to die. And then the niggers do as we ask, and we throw sham trials! That nigger was a part of our society and did exactly as we asked!

He’s doing just fantastic, if anything he needs to up the pressure on the witnesses. He needs to ask them, white people (!), how they feel about niggers. Brooks needs to hard r as frequently as possible. Make those white scumbags pay.

Oh and note on the white race traitors setting up this false trial: they are fucking scum. Did they vote for trump? Are they our people? Or are they nigger sympathizing scum bags?
 
Is it possible for him to still be charged with a hate crime
It usually is unless there are state-level rules against it in this case. Federal hate crime charges is what a white defendant would be terrified of, even if they got off on all state level charges they would get vanned right as they leave the local or state-level courthouse for the last time. Highly optimistic he's getting those charges with this administration though.
 
This may be the dumbest mulatto on Earth. He thinks his sovereign citizen jargon has any hold over the legal system. What a fucking joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naes
Highlights of today:

1. Judge finally told Brooks off about his attempts to say the court didn't have jurisdiction over him and basically told him to STFU about it.

2. Brooks attempted to object to his own question because for the first time in the case he was able to accurately identify what hearsay was, Judge overruled that.

Kinda meh part of the day was the speed analysis from video. I think the officer did alright, I know there are a lot of people online complaining about it but I honestly think they're only going off a Law and Order script level of expectations. Brooks tried to attack him on two fronts:

1. The speed investigation took place in like August 2022, and not immediately after the crime. This is nonsensical because a digital video doesn't change, it doesn't matter when the analysis is done.

2. This is was the first time the expert had done a speed analysis using the software. The police department isn't huge, they've only got one digital forensic guy. He has prior experience and took the classes needed to be certified on the specific software used before doing on the analysis.

Anyway it's not like it really matters, analysis said the car was going 33 mph, doesn't really matter if it was going a little slower or faster, it was still plowing through the parade.


Wednesday

Off to a bang, he's trying to subpoena the state of Wisconsin to testify.

Asked a witness, who's daughter's foot got run over, if they thought the car veered back into the street because it didn't want to hit people on the side of the road.
 
Last edited:
I'm very slowly getting caught up with this case, having nearly finished yesterday's testimony. It's better entertainment than anything Amazuluflix has put out. What was really striking was
Objection. Hearsay.
SHUT THE FUCK UP!
Is that a judicial determination?
It's a shut the fuck up determination.

Anyway, what was really striking was a moment in which the jury was coming back, and the judge was shutting down one dilatory statement after another from Brooks, then she just kind of gave up her official bearing, looked down, and smiled at the absurdity of everything happening. I thought she was really cute in that moment. It's around 7:50:00.

Will start today's testimony tomorrow. Will Brooks finally figure out who is the plaintiff in STATE OF WISCONSIN V. DARRELL BROOKS?
 
No matter what antics this clown performs in court, always remember that six people

Virginia Sorenson
Leanna Owens
Tamara Durand
Jane Kulich
Wilhelm Hospel
Jackson Sparks

Are all dead because Darrell Brooks deliberately accelerated his vehicle toward a parade, with human beings clearly visible in the roadway.
 
His fake crying is so obviously performative. He'll sit there and act like he's about to have a breakdown, and then immediately go into his usual stupid lines of questioning.

Its a shame that Wisconsin doesn't have the death penalty. I'd like to see Brooks get remanded into the custody of the fattest resident of the state, one Patrick S. Tomlinson, in order to be "Grounds" into pepperoni.
 
This is amazing. The judge tore him a new one and he went right back to what he was doing without skipping a beat. I always hear that black men are raised by their mothers, but this guy has no respect for Mommy Judge. I think he was raised by Dale Gribble. If I were the judge, I'd have an American flag with gold fringe displayed prominently the court room tomorrow.
 
>Waukesha massacre suspect Darrell Brooks asked for his case to be dismissed since the victims aren't present in court.
View attachment 3735888
Never have I ever wanted to curbstomp a mother fucker so much after watching this. Would he like the six tombstones to go to the stand so the plaintiff can ask each one a question to counter his retardation?
 
YouTube livestream comments can be pretty funny. "Objection, hearsay" as I was typing this
Screenshot_20221013-184719.png

>Waukesha massacre suspect Darrell Brooks asked for his case to be dismissed since the victims aren't present in court.
Does he not know the difference between civil and criminal court?
 
Back