This sounds familiar.
Law and crime and the fags at the washington post want all of the lawtubers gone because they think they'll get those grifts too. This is some cutthroat shit.
You'd think that people who spend so much time on the net for one reason or another would get that personalities drive engagement and not a brand when it comes to stuff like this.
In fairness, Nick literally went on Info Wars to talk about that.
All of them use it as a work related excuse to indulge in their 40k mini hobby, shoot the shit and have been doing it for awhile, at least once a month typically.
That and he eon’t stream with the little Rackets, who I assume he has made well away of the glory of the Emperor. For what other books to read at bedtime are there?
She is definitely a lolcow. She has become beyond insufferable in past 3 years.
After reading it, it looks to me like he's trying to imply LB and is going to bait and switch. Else he'd just say who.
Well that would certainly be gay so makes he would do that. Did anyone watch the lb pity party that can provide a tldw on it?
Is it possible he didn't know at time of streaming how hard LB went at him in hers when he claimed he wouldn't talk about it? She blamed him for not caring about her enough to do an intervention with her DUI Guy apology video. She was really twisting the situation beyond recognition, and it's honestly bad enough that most people would respond.
rumble.com
It always struck me as an even more faggy version of LawTwitter and it turns out to have been exactly that.
It was fine as a loose coalition of lawyers looking to youtube grift synergistically, but the moment it turned into a club it became gay as fuck.
