- Joined
- Aug 29, 2018
Oh come on.
Let's say she were a racist. What exactly would tagging her with that achieve? Frankly, thanks to Millennial and Generation Z's irresponsible misuse of the word, "racist" now means nothing except "white person". So if you want to attack her for being white, I suppose there's nothing to stop you.
If we take the traditional meaning of "racist" (i.e. segregationist in thought and deed, violent or suppressive of races deemed inferior, promoting negative stereotypes and caricatures associated with a race, asserting the superiority of one's own race), then what actual evidence is there of her supposed racism? I understand that people who throw the term "racist" around loosely don't care about actual evidence, but I'd like to think kiwifarmers are a little bit smarter and more discerning than that.
The evidence rests almost entirely on a couple of garbled words and immature, schoolyard insults. And not even many of those. Calling Charlie Gold "Charlie Coal" is not necessarily racist in and of itself, if she meant to dis her by playing off the name "Gold" as she claims. She never said "black bastards", she said "blah bastards", more likely inserting an "l" in the "bast" syllable because her peabrain was thinking "blast". Calling Nader a "camel" is the level of a childhood taunt, not the stuff of racism. The time she ate fried chicken with Peetz when she apologized to Charlie Gold raised a lot of fur, but she is a moron who thinks about fast food, not race. She just wanted fried chicken that day; she had been on a Pup-eyes kick that month.
Some might point to that and say "SEE? That's PROOF she is a racist!" I would tell those people that saying so is proof that you are an over-protected Gen Z'er. It is proof she is a dimwit, nothing more or less.
Show me a clip of her tossing the N-word around like it is second nature to her, or her calling the cops because a black man is walking his dog in her neighborhood, or telling someone to "go back to Africa", and maybe we'll talk about racism. She does none of that.
Only dating foreign men is not what racism is either. Lots of people only date foreign people for a wide variety of reasons, none of them related to race. In her case, it is because native born and bred Canadians who speak English or even French as a first language recognize her as mentally ill at first glance. A foreigner who is not fluent in her language might assume her weird quirks are some kind of cultural difference and therefore not be immediately turned off by her. That is the same reason why a lot of male incels go to Japan to find a girlfriend; the women in their own countries see them for the losers they are, but a Japanese woman might not recognize the warning signs so quickly. As a strategy, it is doomed to failure because the foreigner will always catch on sooner or later. But it buys time. This has nothing to do with race; it has everything to do with language and culture.
There are so many fucking things wrong with Clotso that one can point to with confidence, so why is it necessary to tag her with "racist" with such a paucity of evidence? She's a fucking slob, a psycho, a nut, a weirdo, a scoundrel, a liar, a bully, a bitch...isn't that enough? Contrary to what they apparently are teaching you at school, white people are not racist by default. But some white people are very tactless, ignorant, and inarticulate, and that describes Clotso.
Let's try to keep the critical race theory bullshit to a minimum here. Because this is fucking stupid.
Let's say she were a racist. What exactly would tagging her with that achieve? Frankly, thanks to Millennial and Generation Z's irresponsible misuse of the word, "racist" now means nothing except "white person". So if you want to attack her for being white, I suppose there's nothing to stop you.
If we take the traditional meaning of "racist" (i.e. segregationist in thought and deed, violent or suppressive of races deemed inferior, promoting negative stereotypes and caricatures associated with a race, asserting the superiority of one's own race), then what actual evidence is there of her supposed racism? I understand that people who throw the term "racist" around loosely don't care about actual evidence, but I'd like to think kiwifarmers are a little bit smarter and more discerning than that.
The evidence rests almost entirely on a couple of garbled words and immature, schoolyard insults. And not even many of those. Calling Charlie Gold "Charlie Coal" is not necessarily racist in and of itself, if she meant to dis her by playing off the name "Gold" as she claims. She never said "black bastards", she said "blah bastards", more likely inserting an "l" in the "bast" syllable because her peabrain was thinking "blast". Calling Nader a "camel" is the level of a childhood taunt, not the stuff of racism. The time she ate fried chicken with Peetz when she apologized to Charlie Gold raised a lot of fur, but she is a moron who thinks about fast food, not race. She just wanted fried chicken that day; she had been on a Pup-eyes kick that month.
Some might point to that and say "SEE? That's PROOF she is a racist!" I would tell those people that saying so is proof that you are an over-protected Gen Z'er. It is proof she is a dimwit, nothing more or less.
Show me a clip of her tossing the N-word around like it is second nature to her, or her calling the cops because a black man is walking his dog in her neighborhood, or telling someone to "go back to Africa", and maybe we'll talk about racism. She does none of that.
Only dating foreign men is not what racism is either. Lots of people only date foreign people for a wide variety of reasons, none of them related to race. In her case, it is because native born and bred Canadians who speak English or even French as a first language recognize her as mentally ill at first glance. A foreigner who is not fluent in her language might assume her weird quirks are some kind of cultural difference and therefore not be immediately turned off by her. That is the same reason why a lot of male incels go to Japan to find a girlfriend; the women in their own countries see them for the losers they are, but a Japanese woman might not recognize the warning signs so quickly. As a strategy, it is doomed to failure because the foreigner will always catch on sooner or later. But it buys time. This has nothing to do with race; it has everything to do with language and culture.
There are so many fucking things wrong with Clotso that one can point to with confidence, so why is it necessary to tag her with "racist" with such a paucity of evidence? She's a fucking slob, a psycho, a nut, a weirdo, a scoundrel, a liar, a bully, a bitch...isn't that enough? Contrary to what they apparently are teaching you at school, white people are not racist by default. But some white people are very tactless, ignorant, and inarticulate, and that describes Clotso.
Let's try to keep the critical race theory bullshit to a minimum here. Because this is fucking stupid.
HARAM)
