Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 66 14.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 115 24.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 85 18.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 200 42.4%

  • Total voters
    472
Covering Brooks' SovCit insanity:
1665804649948.png

Rumbs (thanks Montegraph): https://rumble.com/v1o1jg8-darrell-...from-american-beauty-for-50-straight-min.html


I'm very late and gay.
"Oh, Nick's been a shitstain for years. One sec, I got something for you, Keffals"
"Here we go. Nick, using KF to harrass several voice actors and basically anyone that disagrees that Vic was a sex pest This is par for the course for him"
Vic's moved on from that shit, and he lost.

Vic is only thing that give these people meaning and it's hilarious.
 
I haven't watched cause the only time I wanna see that nigger is when they put him to death, but is he really a SovCit or Moorsman or whatever, or is he just trying to pretend to be one to fuck with the trial as much as he can?
I'm not sure if he's a real sovcit or if he's just litigating by google and his "research" turned up a bunch of sovcit stuff naturally.
By the way, did anyone ever get a copy of the second Chemical Frog Man interview?

I've heard Nick did his Alex Jones impression live in front of AJ.
The second interview was with Owen Shroyer not Alex Jones. Starts around 9:48 in.

 
I'm not sure if he's a real sovcit or if he's just litigating by google and his "research" turned up a bunch of sovcit stuff naturally.
Agreed. He would have been using sovcit arguments since day 1 if he was committed to it. He still hasn't used the name copyright argument and the 'I wasn't driving, I was just traveling' argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: murph and waffle
I'm not sure if he's a real sovcit or if he's just litigating by google and his "research" turned up a bunch of sovcit stuff naturally.

Ok, I will definitely regret to ask this... But what annoys me the most with that whole SovCits thing is when he says "i don't identify by that name". I know there is no logic or sanity behind this bullshit, but what is it he identifies by then? How should he be adressed in his twisted mind?
 
Ok, I will definitely regret to ask this... But what annoys me the most with that whole SovCits thing is when he says "i don't identify by that name". I know there is no logic or sanity behind this bullshit, but what is it he identifies by then? How should he be adressed in his twisted mind?
You have to shout his name like billy mays because he only recognizes the caps lock version of his name the lowercase version of Darrell brooks is a loser he doesn’t associate with that entity
 
You have to shout his name like billy mays because he only recognizes the caps lock version of his name the lowercase version of Darrell brooks is a loser he doesn’t associate with that entity
I think that's backwards, they think the all caps DARRELL BROOKS is the fake name courts refer to, because if it was put on a birth certificate in all caps it's a secret company established in your name or something and that's why legal documents have names in all caps.

Not sure though, it's hard to keep up with sov cit shit it's so schizo and retarded that you wouldn't even be able to figure out what they're getting at if you tried. Favorite thing I learned from one of Nick's guests is why they insist "I don't understand" any time the court asks if they understand something. Seriously, if you don't know, try to think of the stupidest reason possible, and I guarantee it will be stupider than you think.

They think "understand" means "standing under" someone so courts make you say that to declare that you're "under" the court
 
I think that's backwards, they think the all caps DARRELL BROOKS is the fake name courts refer to, because if it was put on a birth certificate in all caps it's a secret company established in your name or something and that's why legal documents have names in all caps.

Not sure though, it's hard to keep up with sov cit shit it's so schizo and retarded that you wouldn't even be able to figure out what they're getting at if you tried. Favorite thing I learned from one of Nick's guests is why they insist "I don't understand" any time the court asks if they understand something. Seriously, if you don't know, try to think of the stupidest reason possible, and I guarantee it will be stupider than you think.

They think "understand" means "standing under" someone so courts make you say that to declare that you're "under" the court
You may be right I might have it backwards but now you’ve made me stand under you so basically you made me gay
I’m sad he isn’t one of the sov cits who thinks that the government opened a secret bank account in his name when he was born so he would be demanding his millions of dollars the whole trial
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: yydszmiteg2
Is that a judicial determination your awna?
We still need to get to subject matta jurisdiction
Y'all just been biast towards him.

Ok, I will definitely regret to ask this... But what annoys me the most with that whole SovCits thing is when he says "i don't identify by that name". I know there is no logic or sanity behind this bullshit, but what is it he identifies by then? How should he be adressed in his twisted mind?
There's never a real answer.

Even if you did everything he wants, he'd complain about something else.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's never a real answer.

Even if you did everything he wants, he'd complain about something else.
Correct. The only winning move is to not play the game these deranged types want you to. They remind me of moral subjectivists in that their definition of true is similar to a subjectivists definition of moral "That which is to my advantage in this moment.".

Save the mental effort and let them spin their wheels being schizo.
 
The best description I've ever heard for them is "They think the law is magic, and if they can just fine the right incantation they'll make themselves demigods that are immune to the law everyone else follows."

Worst one of these "Moorsman" dindu-sovcits I ever heard of is a small clan of them deciding they owned some lawyer's house (mansion?) because of some insane bullshit. Imagine coming home to discover some feral nignogs have used a truck to rip the gate of your fence off it's hinges, broke into your house and are currently throwing your stuff out onto the front lawn. And when they see you driving up, they call the sheriff. Not the cops, the sheriff, because the cops aren't "real" but the sheriff is, right? What's their reason for calling the sheriff? Because as the true natives of America, you are by definition trespassing on their continent, and they want you removed. From North America.

So you have to deal with getting them off your property and fixing your fence and front door and fixing your shit they threw out and replacing the shit they stole...

... And they just show up again a few days later. And again. And again. And again.

Edit: This isn't the one I'm thinking of, but it's a similar story: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/26/nyregion/moors-newark.html

And like any retarded dindus, they're spreading: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/07...ional-sovereign-citizen-movement-experts-say/
 
Correct. The only winning move is to not play the game these deranged types want you to. They remind me of moral subjectivists in that their definition of true is similar to a subjectivists definition of moral "That which is to my advantage in this moment.".

Save the mental effort and let them spin their wheels being schizo.

Except "playing the game" is assuring that he'll be punished to the fullest extent. No viable appeal. And no claims of incompetence or inadequate counsel.

The best description I've ever heard for them is "They think the law is magic, and if they can just fine the right incantation they'll make themselves demigods that are immune to the law everyone else follows."

Worst one of these "Moorsman" dindu-sovcits I ever heard of is a small clan of them deciding they owned some lawyer's house (mansion?) because of some insane bullshit. Imagine coming home to discover some feral nignogs have used a truck to rip the gate of your fence off it's hinges, broke into your house and are currently throwing your stuff out onto the front lawn. And when they see you driving up, they call the sheriff. Not the cops, the sheriff, because the cops aren't "real" but the sheriff is, right? What's their reason for calling the sheriff? Because as the true natives of America, you are by definition trespassing on their continent, and they want you removed. From North America.

So you have to deal with getting them off your property and fixing your fence and front door and fixing your shit they threw out and replacing the shit they stole...

... And they just show up again a few days later. And again. And again. And again.

Edit: This isn't the one I'm thinking of, but it's a similar story: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/26/nyregion/moors-newark.html

And like any retarded dindus, they're spreading: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/07...ional-sovereign-citizen-movement-experts-say/

Archived articles


 
I know there is no logic or sanity behind this bullshit, but what is it he identifies by then?
"Whatever name gets me out of trouble."

That's basically what the sovcit hocus-pocus is all about. They're the original flavor of the modern soy "I reject your bearded sky wizard's rules and laws and refuse to abide by them, but expect you to obey them all and allow me to exploit them against you" shtick.
 
Back