US Waukesha massacre suspect Darrell Brooks pleads not guilty to all charges - It was the SUV

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
1644609013968.png

The Milwaukee man accused of killing six people and running over dozens with an SUV at a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisc. pleaded not guilty to every charge laid against him.

According to the local Fox affiliate, Darrell Brooks, 39, pleaded not guilty to all 77 charges against him.

Brooks remains in jail on $5 million bail. GoFundMe confirmed to FOX Business in November that they removed the fundraiser for violating the crowdsourcing platform's Terms of Service. Additionally, the person who launched the fundraiser, reportedly a man named James Norton, will no longer be permitted to use the platform for any future fundraisers.

The courts have said that there is ample evidence against Brooks, as well as testimony from police detective Thomas Casey, who described how Brooks plowed into citizens even after some yelled at him to stop. Brooks allegedly "zigzagged" across the street "for blocks" at the family event.

Victims include an 8-year-old boy, along with members of the Dancing Grannies troupe, that was performing in the parade.

Public defender Anna Kees said that her defendant could not turn off the route, and that he did not intend to hit pedestrians. She also said that Brooks couldn't bring himself to look at photos of the crimes he allegedly committed.


 
Having looked into the entirety of the SovCit movement since the 9/11 truth MySpace days, including the "USA is a corporation still under English monarchy rules, and your name is in capital letters on your birth cert because you are an entity making money for the Corporation" I can say that given current day Clown World, there may actually be a fucking point to it. Or, send help as I haven't been out of the house in a month and I've lost 20 pounds.

Regardless of my stoned, sick, and hot-toddy-induced ramblings above, the only reason he gets away with spouting this crap is his fucking cream-colored niggardness. Any reining in of this shithead would be wacist. I'm feeling for the witnesses who have family affected having to address this fool with even the least amount of civility, I'd be jumping over the dais to strangle him (look out, we got a badass over here yeah yeah, but I really would have to hold myself back).
 
I know the directions for jurors are not to talk about the case. But I'd like to think of a juror getting home, his wife asking how his day was, and he just responds' "That nigger needs to swing from a tree."
This man is the literal definition of a nigger. I hope he dies in prison from something other than natural causes.
 
Any reining in of this shithead would be wacist.
Any violation of his right to cross examine witnesses and put on a "defense," even one as retarded as his, would be reversible error and everyone would have to go through this bullshit again.
This man is the literal definition of a nigger. I hope he dies in prison from something other than natural causes.
I hope they "accidentally" leave him in a kitchen with some AB lifer with nothing to lose.
 
"He who defends himself in court has a fool for a lawyer." No shit, and I bet he won't be able to use this on appeal. Fuck him, fully.


 
"He who defends himself in court has a fool for a lawyer." No shit, and I bet he won't be able to use this on appeal. Fuck him, fully.


And this is the kind of thing which is why you don't defend yourself in a criminal case even if you actually are a lawyer. You open it up for scenes like this which almost always horribly backfire on you, look like you're a piece of shit bullying witnesses you already caused harm to, etc.

Juries absolutely hate shit like this. On the other hand I doubt even Clarence Darrow could get him out of LWOP.
 
"He who defends himself in court has a fool for a lawyer." No shit, and I bet he won't be able to use this on appeal. Fuck him, fully.


He can try appealing but I watched the hearing they had before Brooks was granted his request to represent themselves and the Judge spent over an hour explaining to him that it was a bad idea, that he had no idea what he was doing, and he would have to do it without help. So the chances of an appeal on the grounds of him botching his own defense are pretty slim.

I guess there's always the possibility the jury is retarded and somehow either don't convict him or we end up with a hung jury. In the latter case the state would definitely try the case again but Brooks might just go back to having a public defender. It all hinges on if they believe Brooks was the one in the vehicle, since obviously if he wasn't then he couldn't be convicted of all the other charges.

Still really looking forward to Brooks' portion of the proceedings, think it should start Tuesday afternoon since the jury is supposed to see the car that day. Kinda hard to estimate since Brooks spends so much time asking witnesses irrelevant and pointless questions. My guess is his opening will probably just be a rehash of everything he talked about during his 50 minute rant. The prosecution can object during the opening statement, which they will if he starts talking about "MUH SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION!" Best case scenario is Brooks goes ballistic in front of the jury.
 
Last edited:
The prosecution can object during the opening statement, which they will if he starts talking about "MUH SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION!" Best case scenario is Brooks goes ballistic in front of the jury.
Subject matter jurisdiction isn't even remotely a matter for the jury to consider, it's a question of law with no questions of fact in the mix. The judge can just instruct the jury that they don't need to and should not consider the issue, that's her job as judge.
 
Here's some random.txt for ya, but you ever see someone die from a broken pelvis?

Yeah that's what I wish would happen to this dude. It ain't pretty and it ain't quick.
I think he should be run over by a car and die from a brain bleed, like that 8 year old boy had happen. Darrell Brooks appeared in a meth documentary (at 9:58), I guess meth will take you on a trip: in this case literally.
 
Having looked into the entirety of the SovCit movement since the 9/11 truth MySpace days, including the "USA is a corporation still under English monarchy rules, and your name is in capital letters on your birth cert because you are an entity making money for the Corporation" I can say that given current day Clown World, there may actually be a fucking point to it. Or, send help as I haven't been out of the house in a month and I've lost 20 pounds.
I'd guess there are some nuggets in the SovCit stuff that can maybe get you out of some fines or taxes or something. Doubt there's anything in there that applies to murder, though.
 
I think he should be run over by a car and die from a brain bleed, like that 8 year old boy had happen. Darrell Brooks appeared in a meth documentary (at 9:58), I guess meth will take you on a trip: in this case literally.
How the hell did you find this? This video looks super old too.
 
Any violation of his right to cross examine witnesses and put on a "defense," even one as retarded as his, would be reversible error and everyone would have to go through this bullshit again.
Yeah. That line about it being necessary to defend even scoundrels against the infringement of rights holds especially true here. I want Brooks to have a fair trial... and a fair prison sentence afterwards. I want absolutely zero confusion about this man's misdeeds that day and after, in both the eyes of the law and the public.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back