Moexlibu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2016
That would be Weaseloid, correct?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be Weaseloid, correct?
In this case, he was right, though.I would not have too much sympathy for Sorte Slyngel...... a history of obssessive edit warring and spamming talk pages with walls of text looking for a reaction.
Adam Morland races straight to the Gamergate pages. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Technical_support#Glitches_still_affecting_stuffA database error has occurred
Are db errors common around here or was there some tuning going on earlier today when the front page exploded? Tekunojutsuka (talk) 16:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
A database error has occurred. Did you forget to run maintenance/update.php after upgrading? See: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Upgrading#Run_the_update_script
Query: SELECT lc_value FROM `rw_l10n_cache` WHERE lc_lang = 'en' AND lc_key = 'deps' LIMIT 1
Function: LCStore_DB::get
Error: 1286 Unknown table engine 'InnoDB' (localhost)
MySQL shat itself yesterday and today, and I can't find a good reason why. Probably the SJWs - David Gerard (talk) 22:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
And again today. Bah. Looks like I'll need to track down the damn problem ... - David Gerard (talk) 13:50, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
WTF MYSQL. It went just before 0900 again today. The actual problem is that MySQL suddenly decides InnoDB isn't a suitable database engine. Usual reason is a corrupted ib_logfile, but IT KEEPS HAPPENING and IT DIDN'T BEFORE. Gah - David Gerard (talk) 11:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
We are back. And you can't read this unless you just hit edit! Looking into this one ... - David Gerard (talk) 23:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Oh, maybe editing fixes it ... - David Gerard (talk) 23:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Glitches still affecting stuff
Report here!
- David Gerard (talk) 23:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
- If a page is blank: - hit "edit" and "save". (presumably some MediaWiki cache, that this flushes.)
Fixed a few of the GG pages, the Milo Yiannopolus page, the Atheism Plus page, ongoing. For some reason, the Bible page was affected too, so it isn't just relatively recent text. - Kitsunelaine 「SJW Illuminati shill.」 23:22, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
yeah, I'm going through the cover articles and anything linked from the front page. I figure there's some MediaWiki internal cache that's gotten confused - David Gerard (talk) 23:25, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
I saw a couple of blank pages earlier when I was trying to edit, but am seeing everything fine now. WèàšèìòìďMethinks it is a Weasel 23:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
I see some blank pages still, including alternative medicine, LGBT rights, and ratfucking (wait, what?!). Until I edit-save them, of course. Athelwulf (talk) 23:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Did he actually say that?
More mod power
so I am proposing we give our mods the ability to check a user's IP. I know we like to give our mods the least amount of power and our userbase the most most amount of privacy, but I think this is a reasonable proposal after the accusations that Kugelschreiber and Pizzameister were socks of banned/binned users. This should prevent witchhunts in the future.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 18:59, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 18:59, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
You mean they can't check IP addresses already? I was under the impression that a number of people could determine the IP addresses.---Mona- (talk) 21:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
No, apparently RW got rid of that ability very early on so no one can do that.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 21:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 21:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
FFS. Of course the mods should be able to determine that. That would greatly increase the ability to enforce a ban/binning.---Mona- (talk) 21:50, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
One of the greatest friction points in your time on RW is that you seem to expect it to be run much more top-down than it is: that someone is responsible, that the hierarchy is firm, that interactions are policed. You seem to have greatly misperceived how authority here works. We are deeply uninterested in enforcing things without really good reason. If someone comes back and isn't obviously being a dickhead, then job done pretty much. Also, regulars change account names all the time just 'cos they feel like it. This is frequently infuriating and fucked-up, but it's a different infuriating and fucked-up to the one you seem to assume is right and natural - David Gerard (talk) 22:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
I don't think that giving the six mods the ability to check user IPs would lead to a more top-down administration. I don't expect the mods to use unless there is ample evidence that a user is a sock.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 22:42, 6 March 2016 (UTC) 22:42, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
I predict it's really not a happener without an overwhelming consensus from the editor population that this is a good idea, and I consider this unlikely (but you can try to gather such if you like) - David Gerard (talk) 22:54, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
David Gerard said:We are deeply uninterested in enforcing things without really good reason. If someone comes back and isn't obviously being a dickhead, then job done pretty much.
What is this world coming to? Gerard and McIntosh actually making sense for once? A broken clock is right twice a day.http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/RationalWiki:Saloon_bar#More_mod_power
Owlman and Mona want the RW mods to be able to CheckUser.
A sudden outbreak of sanity?So I guess arisboch is welcome back? lol
If that's Arisboch at all, it could also be just some guy with a similar political opinion and background stumbling upon the RW, lurking around there for a bit and finally, after the shitfests died down, decided to join. We shouldn't let ourselves be infected by their paranoia and tendency for witch hunts.A sudden outbreak of sanity?
- March 1: Jamie Walton is revealed to be a run of the mill Gamergater, participating in attacks on Gamergate victims for over a year, including Brianna Wu.
March 1: Jamie Walton is revealed to have been participating in Gamergate's stalking of Brianna Wu for a year. Wu confirms. Despite Walton's denial, more and more evidence piles up of her using Gamergate to benefit her foundation all while attacking Wu.
@WhoopieDoo how do you feel about these guys using RationalWiki as a vehicle to smear and attack an anti-sex-trafficking charity in defense of a pedophile because they disagree over fucking video games?
Well spoken!If that's Arisboch at all, it could also be just some guy with a similar political opinion and background stumbling upon the RW, lurking around there for a bit and finally, after the shitfests died down, decided to join. We shouldn't let ourselves be infected by their paranoia and tendency for witch hunts.
You have recently been demopped and unpatrolled by User:Weaseloid because your IP is close to a user who was binned by the community. So I would state your case and if you are a sock then I suggest you appeal with your original account.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 03:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC) 03:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
They don't have CheckUser and I don't think, that Gerard knows enough about MediaWiki to falsify an error page to keep the presence of this function under wraps.Hmm, I thought them CheckUsering people's IPs was verboten?
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Pizzameister#Are_you_a_sock.3F
It is. I don't know where they get the whole IP thing from.Hmm, I thought them CheckUsering people's IPs was verboten?
Thet probably look at certain topics and any unregistered users they they think have a similar style. Seems too much guesswork and paranoia to me.It is. I don't know where they get the whole IP thing from.