War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
What a retarded fucking analogy. Washington is not only part of US, it's also its very heart. Ukraine is not part of Russia, Russia has no legitimate claim to it. Get that through your thick skull already.
He meant Washington state, you know with that whole Capital Hill Autonomous Zone in Seattle they had during the Summer of Love.
The US is the most belligerent state in the world.
Nice goalpost moving.
>At present there are ONLY 18 US bases in Japan
>21 in Germany
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yalta_Conference
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War
I can't imagine why we'd have bases in Japan and Germany. Its not like there's a war going on in Korea (that was started by NK who then received active military support from the CCP and USSR) that the US is still technically a belligerent in, or that Russia has a proven track record of violating treaty promises so it can shamelessly acquire territory under its control. Or that it loves threatening the West and then hiding behind its nuclear arsenal.
I'm not arrogant enough to claim to know about the US ambitions regarding their military plans for some of the countries you listed. But I know very well that the US had the intentions to turn France into a vassal state like they did with Germany. They wanted to cast aside Charles De Gaulles because he was a French nationalist.
De Gaulle was actively dangerous to the Allied cause due to his complete disregard for any authority that wasn't his and contemptuous of his allies for the unforgiveable crime of not being French despite him and his Free French being actively dependent on them for everything, up to and including food. During the planning for Operation Overlord, you know, the invasion of France that would liberate all of Western Europe, including his beloved France, standing orders were that nobody, no matter their rank, would be saluted upon entrance to the main HQ for it because there were to be zero distractions or pauses. Naturally, when De Gaulle showed up he wanted everyone to stop what they were doing and salute him because he's just that important.

So fuck him, and the horse he rode in on.
So no actual news out of Ukraine? Just pages and pages of nonstop extra special autism?
Always has been.
 
He meant Washington state, you know with that whole Capital Hill Autonomous Zone in Seattle they had during the Summer of Love.

Nice goalpost moving.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yalta_Conference
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War
I can't imagine why we'd have bases in Japan and Germany. Its not like there's a war going on in Korea (that was started by NK who then received active military support from the CCP and USSR) that the US is still technically a belligerent in, or that Russia has a proven track record of violating treaty promises so it can shamelessly acquire territory under its control. Or that it loves threatening the West and then hiding behind its nuclear arsenal.

De Gaulle was actively dangerous to the Allied cause due to his complete disregard for any authority that wasn't his and contemptuous of his allies for the unforgiveable crime of not being French despite him and his Free French being actively dependent on them for everything, up to and including food. During the planning for Operation Overlord, you know, the invasion of France that would liberate all of Western Europe, including his beloved France, standing orders were that nobody, no matter their rank, would be saluted upon entrance to the main HQ for it because there were to be zero distractions or pauses. Naturally, when De Gaulle showed up he wanted everyone to stop what they were doing and salute him because he's just that important.

So fuck him, and the horse he rode in on.

Always has been.
Your lecture on De Gaulle comes from an angloid pov. He served French's national interest, as should any sovereign nation do.
 
Your lecture on De Gaulle comes from an angloid pov. He served French's national interest, as should any sovereign nation do.
And his removal would have served the national interests of the UK and US.

Is this really a game you want to play? Because ultimately nobody wins the game of straight zero-sum nationalism.
 
And his removal would have served the national interests of the UK and US.

Is this really a game you want to play? Because ultimately nobody wins if you go by straight zero-sum nationalism.
I know this might come as a shock to you, but unlike what most westerners were taught in school, reality is far from that binary black/white, good/bad Disney vision. History isn't a fucking Hollywood movie or a Disney cartoon. It's ruthless and there's no room for brainwashed retards that think le good wins over le evil. People struggle to survive and war is one of the worst defeat you can obtain when you can avoid this outcome through a lot of different means.
The US/Occident really reminds me of when Rome was starting to crumble. Please just keep basking in your delusion, I hope France and the other countries with foresight will join the BRICS just to shove it up the one that have been waging wars since WWII.
 
It's ruthless and there's no room for brainwashed retards that think le good wins over le evil.
I hope France and the other countries with foresight will join the BRICS just to shove it up the one that have been waging wars since WWII.
You claim that power is more important than subjective good and evil... and then you decide that the world superpower needs to be punished somehow, for moral reasons.

Also, reminder that BRICS is a meme invented by Goldman Sachs when they were economic development. BRICS does not exist as a political bloc.
 
Your lecture on De Gaulle comes from an angloid pov. He served French's national interest, as should any sovereign nation do.
I know this might come as a shock to you, but unlike what most westerners were taught in school, reality is far from that binary black/white, good/bad Disney vision. History isn't a fucking Hollywood movie or a Disney cartoon. It's ruthless and there's no room for brainwashed retards that think le good wins over le evil. People struggle to survive and war is one of the worst defeat you can obtain when you can avoid this outcome through a lot of different means.
The US/Occident really reminds me of when Rome was starting to crumble. Please just keep basking in your delusion, I hope France and the other countries with foresight will join the BRICS just to shove it up the one that have been waging wars since WWII.
Are you French? Because I can think of few other things that would explain this level of hypocrisy, contraction, double-think, and delusional self-importance.
More importantly:

Francia delenda est
The US and UK should have split that country in two after WW2 as compensation for being a mutual headache for almost two hundred years. Reminder to everyone that after the French pissed off all of Europe by making King Louis a head shorter at the neck, they had the absolute gall to come to the USA that was barely a country and in debt to half the world still and demand we declare war on all of Europe to help them out. Naturally we declined, and that lead to the Quasi-War, our first armed conflict as a truly independent nation... fought against the French.
 
Last edited:
You claim that power is more important than subjective good and evil... and then you decide that the world superpower needs to be punished somehow, for moral reasons.
Never made such claim, and never wished for the "world superpower" to be punished, somehow, for moral reason. I'm just relaying what a lot of people (intellectual, philosophers) within the west are observing.

Are you French? Because I can think of few other things that would explain this level of hypocrisy, contraction, double-think, and delusional self-importance.
Are you a rootless drone? Because I can think of a few other things that would explain this level of cynicism, passive aggressivity, and twisted arrogance.
 
Your lecture on De Gaulle comes from an angloid pov. He served French's national interest, as should any sovereign nation do.
Gross you're a fucking frog nigger? I'm responsible for a third of the Oswald Mosely beady eyed anglo memes and even I would take an anglo over a faggot Frenchman. France is the California of Europe except French brown people are more violent and make less appealing food.
 
I know this might come as a shock to you, but unlike what most westerners were taught in school, reality is far from that binary black/white, good/bad Disney vision. History isn't a fucking Hollywood movie or a Disney cartoon. It's ruthless and there's no room for brainwashed retards that think le good wins over le evil. People struggle to survive and war is one of the worst defeat you can obtain when you can avoid this outcome through a lot of different means.

You know who is struggling to survive, here? Ukraine.

I've been reasonably polite so far. But you mealy mouthed cunts always refuse to finish your goddamned thought. So here goes.

"People struggle to survive and war is one of the worst defeat you can obtain when you can avoid this outcome through a lot of different means, such as _____________"

Complete the goddamned sentence with a phrase that doesn't mean "give Russia what they want".
 
You know who is struggling to survive, here? Ukraine.

I've been reasonably polite so far. But you mealy mouthed cunts always refuse to finish your goddamned thought. So here goes.

"People struggle to survive and war is one of the worst defeat you can obtain when you can avoid this outcome through a lot of different means, such as _____________"

Complete the goddamned sentence with a phrase that doesn't mean "give Russia what they want".
SUCH AS RESPECTING THE FUCKING MINSK AGREEMENTS???
 
Off-topic I had no idea France had so many wars in Africa. A lot of these don't even involve the USA.

On-topic article:
McCarthy signals GOP-led House likely to oppose more aid to Ukraine
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) is signaling that if Republicans win the House majority in next month’s midterm elections, the GOP is likely to oppose more aid to Ukraine in its war with Russia.

Since the invasion in February, the majority of congressional Republicans and Democrats have united in authorizing billions of dollars in U.S. military and humanitarian assistance to Kyiv as a geopolitical and moral stand against Vladimir Putin’s aggression.

McCarthy, who could be House speaker if Republicans triumph, indicated that that could end in a GOP-led House.
“I think people are gonna be sitting in a recession and they’re not going to write a blank check to Ukraine,” he recently told Punchbowl News. “They just won’t do it.”

McCarthy suggested that Americans want Congress to focus on issues closer to home.

“There’s the things [the Biden administration] is not doing domestically,” he said. “Not doing the border, and people begin to weigh that. Ukraine is important, but at the same time, it can’t be the only thing they do, and it can’t be a blank check.”
The United States has authorized upward of $60 billion in aid to Ukraine, with more than $18.2 billion in security assistance given since January 2021. The Senate voted to finalize more than $40 billion in new military and humanitarian assistance in May, with Republicans being the only lawmakers voting against that package — the largest investment in Ukraine thus far.

Eleven Republican senators and 57 House GOP members opposed the legislation, arguing that more needs to be done to account for how the money is spent and to trace weapons and equipment sent to the battlefield.

On Friday, the United States announced an additional $725 million in security assistance for Ukraine, including more ammunition for high mobility rocket systems, or HIMARS, as well as precision-guided artillery rounds, antitank weapons and Humvees, according to a Pentagon statement.
[In Kyiv, U.S. midterms, and need for aid, cast shadow on battlefield gains]
Although most of the congressional leadership, most notably Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), have been steadfast in support for Ukraine, voters in several states in January could send Republicans to Washington who are eager to oppose aid. The number of those wary of foreign aid and adherents of former president Donald Trump’s “America First” agenda are expected to grow in the next Congress.

In September, J.D. Vance, the venture capitalist and author who is locked in a close race for a U.S. Senate seat representing Ohio, said he wants “the Ukrainians to be successful” but not because of continued U.S. funding.

“I do think that we have to get to a point, and this is where we do disagree, we’ve got to stop the money spigot to Ukraine eventually,” he told the ABC affiliate in Toledo. “We cannot fund a long-term military conflict that I think ultimately has diminishing returns for our own country.”
Vance added, “I think we’re at the point where we’ve given enough money in Ukraine, I really do. ... The Europeans need to step up. And frankly, if the Ukrainians and the Europeans, more importantly, knew that America wasn’t going to foot the bill, they might actually step up.”

Europe has provided a significant amount of military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine.
In Arizona, Republican Senate nominee Blake Masters criticized the additional funding for Ukraine in May, claiming that the money should be used instead to build a wall at the U.S.-Mexico border.

“Under Joe Biden, it’s always America last,” he said in a video he tweeted. “Let’s be clear about what this means. It means no cease-fire. It means another foreign war where we pay for everything. Many more thousands of people will die. There’s no resolution, no end in sight. The risk of course is that a proxy war can escalate into an all-out nuclear war between nuclear powers.”

In New Hampshire, Republican Senate candidate Don Bolduc said last week that more spending is not the answer to improving conditions in Ukraine.
“We must hold the administration accountable,” he told New Hampshire’s ABC affiliate. “We just can’t print this money. It’s money we don’t have, and it’s equipment that’s being thrown at a problem without any strategy, without any policy, and it’s not going to get the job done.”

These Republicans could join Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who in May temporarily held up $40 billion of aid to Ukraine, saying, “you can’t save Ukraine by dooming the U.S. economy.”
The loudest voices on the right on the issue, such as Fox News’s Tucker Carlson, have been outspoken in questioning aid to Ukraine.

The Conservative Political Action Conference in September posted, then deleted, a tweet that echoed Kremlin language and called for a halt to “gift-giving to Ukraine.” It later issued a statement reaffirming its stance on U.S. assistance. “We must oppose Putin, but American taxpayers should not be shouldering the vast majority of the cost,” it said.
McCarthy’s comments to Punch Bowl News drew an incredulous response from Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), who tweeted at McCarthy, “What in the absolute bloody hell is happening to @GOPLeader.”

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has warned that if the GOP wins the House, help for Ukraine would be in jeopardy.
“I just see a freight train coming, and that is Trump and his operation turning against aid for Ukraine,” he said on MSNBC. “House Republicans, if they were to take the majority, being preternaturally against anything Joe Biden is for — including the war in Ukraine — and there being a real crisis where the House Republican majority would refuse to support additional aid to Ukraine.”

"People struggle to survive and war is one of the worst defeat you can obtain when you can avoid this outcome through a lot of different means, such as _____________"

Complete the goddamned sentence with a phrase that doesn't mean "give Russia what they want".
"nuclear deterrence"

SUCH AS RESPECTING THE FUCKING MINSK AGREEMENTS???
 
Some real news for a change:

KA-52 confirmed loss #23. Two more confirmed losses to equate to 25% fleet degradation.
media_FfgWFc3XoAAE_P1.jpg
 
I don't think any shitlibs would be upset if you nuked my account, but I'm not particularly attached to it.
Please though, in the interests of peace delete your account. This flame war will continue until you do so. Not giving into my demands makes you a violence-fetishing warhawk, and that only feeds Soro's global agenda.
I know this might come as a shock to you, but unlike what most westerners were taught in school, reality is far from that binary black/white, good/bad Disney vision. History isn't a fucking Hollywood movie or a Disney cartoon. It's ruthless and there's no room for brainwashed retards that think le good wins over le evil. People struggle to survive and war is one of the worst defeat you can obtain when you can avoid this outcome through a lot of different means.
The US/Occident really reminds me of when Rome was starting to crumble. Please just keep basking in your delusion, I hope France and the other countries with foresight will join the BRICS just to shove it up the one that have been waging wars since WWII.

This just like the time Rome gave weapons to the Kievan Rus to own the Seljuks. Wait.

Again, how does any of this apply to Russia invading another country that posed no threat to it and killing civilians with indiscriminate shelling, missiles, and suicide drones?

It's kind of funny, if you read your own image you dumb faggot would you'd realize none of the counties I listed have a NATO base. Also your sand nigger source is wrong. At present there are only 18 US bases in Japan and 21 in Germany. If there are really 120 in Japan and 119 in Germany, please find a list of them.




Remember he is quoting Al Jizzya who is trying to 5th column the Western Devil so that Arabs can return to the purity of the 8th century where they can own slaves and murder Jews with impunity - a noble goal to be sure, but their means are utter garbage.

When they are listing these inflated numbers they are counting military INSTALLATIONS not BASES. The average base as a bunch of installation, so an Airforce base might have an installation like "The Eustus Q "Scooter" Dagostein Center for Prostate Massage Excellence" which is run by the USMC. As the USMC detachment doesn't report to the Base's commander, it is a separate installation. So they count all these things.

De Gaulle was actively dangerous to the Allied cause due to his complete disregard for any authority that wasn't his and contemptuous of his allies for the unforgiveable crime of not being French despite him and his Free French being actively dependent on them for everything, up to and including food. During the planning for Operation Overlord, you know, the invasion of France that would liberate all of Western Europe, including his beloved France, standing orders were that nobody, no matter their rank, would be saluted upon entrance to the main HQ for it because there were to be zero distractions or pauses. Naturally, when De Gaulle showed up he wanted everyone to stop what they were doing and salute him because he's just that important.

So fuck him, and the horse he rode in on.

Always has been.

Not only that but De Gaulle purposely sabotaged and excerted his full political might to ensure the British were excluded from the European Economic Zone (precursor to the EU but significantly less cucked, more about eliminating trade barriers Vs. Importing violent sand niggers to rape & murder children) for his entire life.
You know, the country that supplied and fed his exiled forces after his own leaders cucked under to the Nazis.

De Gaulle was a piece of shit.

He also turned Algeria back over to the backwards camel fuckers.
 
I know this might come as a shock to you, but unlike what most westerners were taught in school, reality is far from that binary black/white, good/bad Disney vision. History isn't a fucking Hollywood movie or a Disney cartoon. It's ruthless and there's no room for brainwashed retards that think le good wins over le evil. People struggle to survive and war is one of the worst defeat you can obtain when you can avoid this outcome through a lot of different means.
The US/Occident really reminds me of when Rome was starting to crumble. Please just keep basking in your delusion, I hope France and the other countries with foresight will join the BRICS just to shove it up the one that have been waging wars since WWII.
So we should struggle to crush Russia
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back