- Joined
- Sep 20, 2016
Most universities don't allow wiki to be cited as a source in research papers for a reason. He'd know that if he ever went to college instead of rotting through a gaming chair for his entire adult life. But go off, cis.
#DropKiwiFarms
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
- Status
Bobsmyuncle
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2018
If Wikipedia is always correct because it has "sources" at the bottom of the page than why does it ever need to be changed?
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Wikipedia is always right, chud!
John Money - Wikipedia
David Reimer - Wikipedia
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
This faggot dares to ruin Homestar Runner with his faggotry?!
- Joined
- May 22, 2019
Holy shit - someone is close to becoming self-aware!
Pretty sure most JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS don't allow Wikipedia et. al. to be used, forget colleges. And I'm sure if Wikipedia for a hot second edit the KF article to not be a completely biased piece of shit, John/DKF would be screeching into the void about how untrustworthy it is, because he's a hypocritical retard.
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2019
I remember Wikipedia has issues with "Primary sources" and would instead use "Secondary sources" such as news articles and shit like that. I only remember that when Byuu/Near didn't appear in the US overseas deathlist and wikipedia refused to use that death list as a source. In other words even the sources on Wikipedia shouldn't be trusted entirely which I've seen schools use to circumvent using Wikipedia for research projects via hijacking their sources.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2019
I remember for a while I tried to describe the Troon unicorn ranch as a ‘compound’ and made reference to its inhabitants as being extreme left and gun enthusiasts, None of these edit’s got past the censors, they determined that a photo of a rifle wielding tranny stood in front of an anarcho communist flag from their own Twitter wasn’t conclusive evidence of the ranch’s politics leanings.
Could you imagine it the other way around “Well yeah, we see him throwing up a Roman salute in front of a swastika flag, but has he actually explicitly said he’s a national socialist?”
Could you imagine it the other way around “Well yeah, we see him throwing up a Roman salute in front of a swastika flag, but has he actually explicitly said he’s a national socialist?”
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2019
Velivian Fesothe 🇬🇧🏳️🌈 🔜 FreeFurAll23? on Twitter: "@brave Are …
archived 20 Oct 2022 21:20:32 UTC
Velivian Fesothe 🇬🇧🏳️🌈 🔜 FreeFurAll23? on Twitter: "Do you thin…
archived 20 Oct 2022 21:21:37 UTC
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2018
Gillian de Nooijer @GillianDN is a fucking moron who needs to be fact-checked himself: doxxing on the internet was not pioneered by the chans or KF, but rather by anti-abortionists - see Nuremberg Files - in 1996 and this predates 4chan (f. 2003) doxxing and 8chan (f. 2013) doxxing by almost two decades.
In 1996 the coalition revealed its "Nuremberg Files" which included dossiers on abortion providers, politicians, judges, clinic employees and other abortion rights supporters. They claimed that these dossiers could be used for trials for "crimes against humanity" when the nation's laws changed to prohibit abortion. Neal Horsley, an activist, published the information on his website. His website greyed the names of those injured and crossed out the names of those killed by anti-abortion activists.[1][3]
In Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Willamette v. American Coalition of Life Activists, Planned Parenthood successfully sued the American Coalition of Life Activists. Although the posters and website did not contain any specific threat, the jury awarded $107 million. The coalition appealed the verdict on First Amendment grounds. A panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals initially overturned the verdict, holding that the activities were protected under the First Amendment because they did not directly threaten harm to the plaintiffs, and because the statements were not communicated privately to the plaintiffs. The en banc 9th Circuit reversed the panel, and held that the coalition could be held liable in damages because the website made a deliberate threat with the expectation that someone would act on it, unprotected by the First Amendment.[1][2]
American Coalition of Life Activists - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Willamette v. American Coalition of Life Activists, 290 F.3d 1058 (2002),[nb 1] was a freedom of speech case of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit over statements by pro-life activists who publicized personal information about specific abortion doctors, and indirectly suggested the possibility of violence against those individuals. The Ninth Circuit ultimately affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon that the speech was a true threat that is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Nuremberg Files go dark again
The controversial anti-abortion site is shuttered again when its service provider is ordered by its T-1 provider to remove it.www.cnet.com
But you can rely on a self-declared on this "Specialist in Extremism History Politics" to conveniently forget the actual internet history of doxxing in order to push a false narrative.
CapricornusRex
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
Dude, he's 50. Wikipedia didn't exist when he went to school so he has no idea about any of that information. It makes his addiction to the internet all the more creepy and weird. It's crazy to think this man used to have a wife, and looked kinda happy until he got addicted to the shittiest MMO ever.
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2021
pretty sure he was always a deadbeat retarded loser. His ex wife was only allowed to move back in with her parents if she never saw her husband again. She traded marriage for a bedroom in her parents house as a grown woman.
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2020
Given the kind of person he is, it's a very good trade.
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2020
Its almost like they have an exhochamber and think only them and their own batshite opinions are present on da twitter
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2016
Update on Vordrak's harassment of this guy's wife for her husband's crime of supporting free expression and refusing to be cowed by terrorists.
archive.ph
Rob Tyree on Twitter: "What happens if you stand up to the woke cance…
archived 21 Oct 2022 01:12:03 UTC
CapricornusRex
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
I never said she was happy. He just looked happy-ish.
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2018
Why can't Vordrak just admit he wants to fuck the guy's wife and stop hiding it?Update on Vordrak's harassment of this guy's wife for her husband's crime of supporting free expression and refusing to be cowed by terrorists.
View attachment 3753695Rob Tyree on Twitter: "What happens if you stand up to the woke cance…
archived 21 Oct 2022 01:12:03 UTC
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
Notice how John establishes a burden he won't accept anyway ("prove Wikipedia's sources wrong"; which you can't because he'd reject any contrary source) and then still shifts the goalposts to requiring they "prove everything wrong" even though he setup the first burden to already be impossible.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
You’d think that vordrak would have learned SOME law in the decades of having his shit pushed in but nope. I could do a better lolsuit and I’ve only listened to a drunk retard and watched null reply to dcmasUpdate on Vordrak's harassment of this guy's wife for her husband's crime of supporting free expression and refusing to be cowed by terrorists.
View attachment 3753695Rob Tyree on Twitter: "What happens if you stand up to the woke cance…
archived 21 Oct 2022 01:12:03 UTC
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
Most people who file lolsuits don't even give a shit what the actual law might be, they think the law should conform to their wishes and refuse to listen to anyone who tells them otherwise. Complete idiots win in small claims court all the time but these guys are so much dumber they think they can personally overturn the Supreme Court or whatever just by sperging harder.
- Status