US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
View attachment 3752130
These people want your children dead, mutilated, or brainwashed, and they think it's funny.
"A panel of share holders in Pfizer and BioTech voted unanimously to make themselves richer."

The idea of Stacey Abrams suggesting that abortions are good for inflation seems ghoulish if one thinks about it. When she pivoted towards the same climate change agenda, she’s essentially suggesting that killing babies and/or not having children is good for you so you don’t go broke in life.

She‘s a politician talking like she’s a doctor.
It's idiotic to even suggest that babies are causing inflation, or that killing them in the womb would somehow solve inflation. I knew that Abrams was a dumb, gap-toothed nigger, but I never took her as a Satanist.
 
Anyone else remember that ad in Virginia during Northam's run with the eeevil pickup truck with conservative stuff on it doing its best to run down a bunch of poor PoC kids?
There was also an edit with Mario Judah's Die Very Rough.
edit2:
 
Last edited:
See, Trump could do this. He'd A/B test a name that would completely destroy a lefty politician.

Biden and his handlers, convinced Trump is some sort of idiot, desperately want to do the same thing to him... but can't, because Trump was not, in fact, stupid and was fucking amazing at persuasion and manipulation. Ergo the constant attempts to making "MAGA" into a dirty word to try and turn it into the new "Nazi."

I'm convinced they're operating on the same playbook they tried to go after the Tea Party with, but it's not working this time cause MAGA got too big too fast, or they just aren't smart enough to understand how they killed the Tea Party. The only people who are against "Making America Great Again" are people who actually hate America, so they have an uphill battle to try and convince people that MAGA means something else.
If you look back on it, the main tactic they used to shut down the Tea Party (and also Occupy) was to promote the craziest motherfuckers as hard as possible - and prop them up to ensure the message got as muddy as possible. That required that you have a ready supply of usable crazies (the Moral Majority clowns in the case of the Tea Party, and the Intersectionalists in the case of Occupy) which can be counted on so that the message goes from something cogent to something ridiculous. For the Tea Party this meant getting people opposed to gay marriage shrieking about random nonsense, and for Occupy.... well fuck you've seen the infamous Daily Show clips by this point.

But the establishment has a lock on the craziest motherfuckers and everyone knows it by now - a cold side-effect of the same shit several of us (myself included, but especially @MirrorNoir and company) talked about all thread long. Oh, you can find a few MAGA supporters who believe in something patently ridiculous? Sure would be a problem there if we didn't have sitting Dem congresscritters going on about how 9/11 was a good thing or something.
 
It's idiotic to even suggest that babies are causing inflation, or that killing them in the womb would somehow solve inflation. I knew that Abrams was a dumb, gap-toothed nigger, but I never took her as a Satanist.

Abrams is butchering and badly butchering at that, a sort of unpleasant truth about life in eras of high inflation and economic catastrophe: that abortion becomes a viable alternative to people who just don't have the financial stability or resources to raise a kid.

If you are poor or middle class and barely getting by, having a kid can be an economic catastrophe to your very existence due to how expensive it is to have a kid, let alone raising one. To the point that it's much cheaper in the long run to pay $500+ to kill the kid inside of you, than actually have the kid and be on the hook for thousands upon thousands of dollars raising and educating and feeding them.

But it's not something people want to talk about because it reduces abortion to literal eugenics for poor people and incentives the notion that abortion as a means of population control by way of allowing poor people to kill their unborn children because society makes it impossible for poor people to raise kids in such an economically apocalyptic society.
 
They really do think it should be illegal to oppose the uniparty agenda.
I mean they're apparently trying to cockblock twitter being raped by elon for "national security reasons" so uh. Apparently behind the mask was ANOTHER mask and now THAT'S also slipping off.

Wonder how many layers till people figure out the government is a petulant manchild at best these days.
 
If you look back on it, the main tactic they used to shut down the Tea Party (and also Occupy) was to promote the craziest motherfuckers as hard as possible - and prop them up to ensure the message got as muddy as possible.
This is the danger of leaderless movements. The two largest problems they face are, as you say, the grifters, but also the opposition trying to concern-troll them into appointing a leadership, which then becomes a single point of failure. Either they're bounced into accepting already-controlled leadership; or they're harassed into anointing one of the self-appointed "leaders" that pop up to try and grift, who will almost definitely have skeletons in his closet that can be exploited by the opposition to discredit the movement.

The Tea Party suffered and eventually fell to the latter, allowing itself to be conned into picking leaders, who were then systematically discredited and destroyed, taking the movement down with them. Occupy suffered the former: Deliberate subversion by outside forces assuming leadership positions, though they were certainly exploiting flaws that already existed within the movement. It's likely occupy would have fractured eventually, due to the woke discourse that had already permeated the American left, but it would probably have split into a weak woke rump and a larger, non-partisan or centre-left populist group. Instead, the woke infection was deliberately encouraged, in order to drive out the populists and "centrists", and the woke rump ended up becoming the only part left standing.

A movement that aggregates around a single figure, like with the Trumpismists, is far less vulnerable to that brand of subversion, though it does come with its own set of problems.
 
You think they ever get tired of running the same thing over and over?
No, because their audience is retarded to the point that instead of groaning and changing the channel, they instead ree and declare that Trump being cleared again just showcases how corrupt the system is. If at your first 235343rd tries you don't succeed, the game is rigged because you were supposed to win.
 
If you look back on it, the main tactic they used to shut down the Tea Party (and also Occupy) was to promote the craziest motherfuckers as hard as possible - and prop them up to ensure the message got as muddy as possible. That required that you have a ready supply of usable crazies (the Moral Majority clowns in the case of the Tea Party, and the Intersectionalists in the case of Occupy) which can be counted on so that the message goes from something cogent to something ridiculous. For the Tea Party this meant getting people opposed to gay marriage shrieking about random nonsense, and for Occupy.... well fuck you've seen the infamous Daily Show clips by this point.

But the establishment has a lock on the craziest motherfuckers and everyone knows it by now - a cold side-effect of the same shit several of us (myself included, but especially @MirrorNoir and company) talked about all thread long. Oh, you can find a few MAGA supporters who believe in something patently ridiculous? Sure would be a problem there if we didn't have sitting Dem congresscritters going on about how 9/11 was a good thing or something.
It certainly doesn't hurt that they have spent the past 5 years purging from the internet any of the crazy motherfuckers on the right. This had the combined effect of getting rid of some of the crazies and finally beating the idea of "optics" into the others.

When they went to the deep twitter well to find some crazies on the MAGA movement to push forward as representative, all they found were

1666343616600.png
 
Abrams is butchering and badly butchering at that, a sort of unpleasant truth about life in eras of high inflation and economic catastrophe: that abortion becomes a viable alternative to people who just don't have the financial stability or resources to raise a kid.

If you are poor or middle class and barely getting by, having a kid can be an economic catastrophe to your very existence due to how expensive it is to have a kid, let alone raising one. To the point that it's much cheaper in the long run to pay $500+ to kill the kid inside of you, than actually have the kid and be on the hook for thousands upon thousands of dollars raising and educating and feeding them.

But it's not something people want to talk about because it reduces abortion to literal eugenics for poor people and incentives the notion that abortion as a means of population control by way of allowing poor people to kill their unborn children because society makes it impossible for poor people to raise kids in such an economically apocalyptic society.
Margret Sanger would be proud.
 
I have a feeling that a significant portion of the black male voting population of Georgia isn't going for Stacey Abrams. She's a fat, obnoxious, aggressive, gap-toothed black lady, and they've been around women like that all of their lives and won't be enthused about voting for one to run the state. That doesn't mean they'll vote for Kemp, most of them won't, instead they'll just stay home on election day.

I have absolutely nothing to back this up, it's just a feeling I have.
 
I have a feeling that a significant portion of the black male voting population of Georgia isn't going for Stacey Abrams. She's a fat, obnoxious, aggressive, gap-toothed black lady, and they've been around women like that all of their lives and won't be enthused about voting for one to run the state. That doesn't mean they'll vote for Kemp, most of them won't, instead they'll just stay home on election day.

I have absolutely nothing to back this up, it's just a feeling I have.
Man, I'm looking forward to another 6 years of that buck toothed sheboon ranting about how she totally won (after all, she knows how much they rigged to get her in) but somehow she lost anyway, which must have meant the right cheated somehow. Heck, maybe if she gets mad enough the ugly fat fuck will let it slip that they pulled some vote rigging bullshit, that'll be fun.
 
Man, I'm looking forward to another 6 years of that buck toothed sheboon ranting about how she totally won (after all, she knows how much they rigged to get her in) but somehow she lost anyway, which must have meant the right cheated somehow. Heck, maybe if she gets mad enough the ugly fat fuck will let it slip that they pulled some vote rigging bullshit, that'll be fun.
They've given up on her. All the adds lately have been focused on encouraging vote splitting. IOW getting enough people who vote for Kemp to vote Warnock instead of Walker, because isnt that the nice centrist thing to do?

Kemp and the Georgia GOP are pure Rinos and wont do shit if a flood of ballots happen 3am in Atlanta that split the ticket and knock out Walker. All they care about is using the state government for kickbacks.
 
They've given up on her. All the adds lately have been focused on encouraging vote splitting. IOW getting enough people who vote for Kemp to vote Warnock instead of Walker, because isnt that the nice centrist thing to do?

Kemp and the Georgia GOP are pure Rinos and wont do shit if a flood of ballots happen 3am in Atlanta that split the ticket and knock out Walker. All they care about is using the state government for kickbacks.
I'm genuinely curious to see how effective Kemps and Raffenspergers Election Integrity legislation will be now that its their positions that are on the ballot.
 
And also that Wyoming, Utah, Idaho, North Dakota and Iowa are all red states and have low violent crime compared to the US average. I am 100% convinced South Dakota being that high has to do with Injun reservations.
View attachment 3751061
I just cant for the life of me come up with any reason or correlation as to why the crime is so high in certain states, especially southern states compared to others...
 
It's almost as if his admin is made up of nothing but Reddit users.
The real existential horror of knowing reddit jannies have infiltrated the government like some Tom Clancy ripoff.
They're our rulers, so of course they think we shouldn't have the right to disagree with them. Hell, back in the day Nobles KILLED Commoners for offending them.
Unironically I believe that a non-insignificant part of the problem with these niggers in the establishment is that people keep calling these cocksuckers "leaders" and such.

Society needs to go back to calling these people what they are, if for no other reason than to remind them what their job actually is: public servants.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back