H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
@Null please insttitute a pedo-doxing bounty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Null please insttitute a pedo-doxing bounty.
What about neckbeards or legbeards?A point system with pedos at the highest points followed by bronies and furries
What about neckbeards or legbeards?
While true, look at the scale of the witch-hunting now ongoing as the BBC attempts to atone for the sins of the past, many of the people responsible for the second cover up (namely the Newsnight scandal) are now no longer in post.
The problem with Saville was the scale of his charity work effectively made him bullet-proof. Information could be more easily suppressed during that era because it was held by very few people and it was difficult for people of similar experience to seek each other out discreetly, this was only aided by the internet and other media outlets upon his death when the 'rumours' resurfaced and were more properly investigated.
That's everybody here.
But you see, that's the self-described purpose of the media. They're supposed to search out, investigate, expose, and inform. When you fail at what you set as your own job description--and when you engage in systematic shielding of the people you're supposed to be exposing--you're fired. Time to rethink the system. Time to reform, and do away with the corrupt and the unnecessary.
The Internet's made the mainstream media obsolete? Good, progress. Let's do progress.
The holy pedo trinity, watching over the front page.I came here to say I love the new mugshots of these wackos on the front page. It's like our own autistic Ten List.
Anti-pedo is code word for anti-white.I came here to say I love the new mugshots of these wackos on the front page. It's like our own autistic Ten List.
What happened to society? Why is condemning pedophilia kink-shaming now?
The most common argument I hear is that they can't help their attraction to children so we should tolerate it. Granted it probably wasn't their choice to become a pedophile, but does that matter if they hurt children?
Some serial killers are motivated by lust. Murder is the only way they can achieve orgasm. Should we feel sorry for them? Should we tolerate their sexuality? You have to draw the line where other people become victims. Pedophiles should be ashamed because their "sexuality" is detrimental to society.
convicted pedos get whats coming to them in prison...that is if they get caught! Alabama has a law sitting in their congress about castrating sex offenders, While it is a double edged sword and the possibility of someone getting falsely accused and convicted is a chance but it does have its benefits.
http://wavy.com/2016/03/05/alabama-lawmakers-introduce-sex-offenders-castration-bill/
Dyne's brought up the fact that GG is a self-sustaining resource when it comes to lolcow generation, but I don't even he realized the breadth of nuttery we'd see from all this stuff. None of these people can take responsibility for anything, no matter how directly culpable they are. Alison Rapp was just the newest part of the same goddamned thing we've seen for over a year now.
"It's Gamergate's fault I'm being accused of a pedophile!"
"It's Gamergate's fault that I'm in trouble for defending a convicted pedophile and argued for legalizing child porn ownership whilst working for a PR firm for a gaming company! It's also Gamergate's fault that I linked the paper on my LinkedIn profile!"
"It's Gamergate's fault that I hate my audience and hate having to do my job without forcing my beliefs on people!"
For fuck's sake.
So I read the OP and it sounded to me as though this virped.org place was actively seeking to protect pedos from public scrutiny and actively matching them with communities that will protect people. The mentioning of Butts, Colby and Rapp in the OP on this virped community led me to believe that this community had some sort of direct link to those three. I looked through the replies here and no one was really elaborating on what those links are, however people did seem concerned so I decided to look into this virped community a little further.
Virped.org
Virped.org is a community that boasts a community of 1,200 members, however there is no public discussion and for access you must contact the administrators of the website.
View attachment 76696
The site is run by "Ethan Edwards" and "Nick Devlin" [pseudonyms].
The website itself does not appear to be active. The welcome message is from 2014 and the copyright at the bottom of the page says 2015, both signs that there isn't a great degree of maintenance happening here.
There is a tab for quotes from scientists on pedophilia and the treatment of those who seek to never harm children. None of the quotes seem to advocate for those who have actually committed a crime or violation against children or expressed that the use of other media that sexualizes children in fiction should be used to suppress the urge to hurt children. It simply accepts that pedophiles exist and that research and practice in psychology should support prevention of child molestation. One way is through treatment of the condition.
There is also an FAQ. The FAQ is useful in understanding more about the community and the mission. The mission of the community appears to be optimistic and not necessarily in alignment with reality, however nothing in the self-description of the community espouses anything to suggest that harming children or indulging in media that sexualizes children should be consumed to suppress urges.
The history of virped.org is also discussed here and what is interesting is that virped.org split off from another community that was actually open to the idea of adult-child relations. The founders of virped.org split off from a site named B4UACT (http://www.b4uact.org), and did so because the site would not explicitly state that child-adult relationships are wrong.
The website also gives some links which lead to the blogs of staff members. The names attached are said to be pseudonyms so doxing people by these names themselves should be approached with caution, especially considering the subject matter. Combing through these blogs can give you a better understanding of their positions which while again appear to be very optimistic do not seem to cast defense on people who either have offended or plan to offend against children in any way or advocate the use of any media that sexualizes children.
Ethan Edwards http://celibatepedos.blogspot.com/
Todd Nickerson https://notamonsterblog.wordpress.com/
Ender Wiggin https://medium.com/@enderphile
For those digging for dirt on these guys, I would suggest their off-site commentary. Blogs might be full of stuff like this that could be more incriminating (accepting drawn porn as an alternative to child molestation).
The site also lists a message board that is open to the public for non-offending pedophiles.
http://www.pedofilie-info.cz/