Jekyll's commonly used with GitHub pages to publish simple sites, so I did a quick search there, but no dice. Then did a site search (
site:github.com "endkiwifarms") with my preferred search engine and got this:
View attachment 3777968
You get a 404 if you visit the URL. Maybe LFJ accidentally created it as a public repo first?
Edit: HTTP response headers for endkiwifarms.net show it's served by GitHub.
HTTP:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
Age: 0
Cache-Control: max-age=600
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Encoding: gzip
Content-Length: 1532
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 01:07:01 GMT
ETag: W/"6358c285-1135"
Last-Modified: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 05:15:49 GMT
Server: GitHub.com
I take this as evidence that Liz is behind Endkiwifarms.net
The language used in the latest post definitely suggests it's Liz (for those of you that didn't get to read it):
As members of the End Kiwi Farms campaign originally predicted in September, after being held in violation of Cloudflare's Terms of Service and Human Rights Policy, Kiwi Farms has bounced between various marginal providers. Eventually, no provider was both able and willing to be named as their...
endkiwifarms.net
Archived:
https://archive.ph/3JlPK
On Kiwi Farms' recent return to the open internet
Nov 2, 2022
As members of the End Kiwi Farms campaign originally predicted in September, after being held in violation of Cloudflare's Terms of Service and Human Rights Policy, Kiwi Farms has bounced between various marginal providers. Eventually, no provider was both able and willing to be named as their gateway to the internet. Only their domain registrar, Epik, and an Epik subsidiary, Terrahost, are left as the public front for Kiwi Farms.
While Kiwi Farms almost certainly has multiple suppliers besides Epik and Terrahost (some of whom may not even know what they are hosting, due to traffic tunneling and encryption), it is telling that the internet community has cast out Kiwi Farms. So called “free speech” reaches its limits once enough people get hurt. Just as the internet systematically rejects spam and malware, the people who operate the internet should also reject attempts to cause significant harm to vulnerable groups and individuals.
Zayo and Voxility, tier 1 and tier 2 network providers respectively, both acted decisively once they learned about abuse being perpetuated by one of their customers. Epik should know that it will face mounting pressure upon its suppliers, whether they be Amazon Web Services, which provides it with DNS services, or GTT Communications and Sprint (now known as T-Mobile for Business), which provide it with Tier 1 transit and reachability to the rest of the internet.
This is an exceptional case, because Kiwi Farms has been kicked off of every managed hosting provider they've been on. For good cause, as their sole purpose is to violate the terms of service that every turnkey hosting provider is willing to tolerate. Most other sites so systematically rejected by mainstream providers would turn to Tor and the dark web, but Kiwi Farms behaved differently. Having burned all their bridges with managed providers, they turned to using their own infrastructure, all the way down to the IP assignment, ASN, and BGP layers.
Kiwi Farms has disguised themselves as just a fellow peer in the internet community, "1776 Solutions," and exploited our trust in each other to disseminate not just hatred, but incitement to violence. Our systems are designed for every network operator to act in good faith and assume others are acting in good faith when passing on reports or concerns, but what if they aren't? What if they are threatening our colleagues with harassment and violence?
What recourse do we have if the holder of a RIR-assigned netblock is using it specifically to harm people with no legitimate purpose? What if they refuse to take action on any reports of abuse because they themselves are the ones perpetuating abuse? What if the holder of an AS designation insists you peer with them on the same terms other paying transit clients do, pinky swears that they'll abide by your ToS and have an abuse contact, yet ignores the abuse reports, or worse, retaliates against those who report abuse?
We already agree as an Internet infrastructure community that CSAM is abhorrent and has no place on our networks, that blatant attempts to hijack traffic, disseminate worms/malware, or launch volumetric denial of service attacks should be blocked at source. That anyone who knowingly tolerates such is in turn also not welcome. DROP (Don't Route or Peer) is an effective technique that we have used for decades to manage abusive actors.
Speech is only free for all if those who are in the most danger are not silenced through threat of violence from others' "free speech". In the absence of governmental action (given governments may not always agree, are often the threat model, and turn a blind eye to harm), employees must collectively exercise their ethical obligations as engineers to prevent harm. We hope both that providers will devise human rights framework-based Terms of Service that reject censorship of vulnerable communities' voices such as sex workers, ethnic minorities such as Palestinians, and transgender people, while also enforcing that their services are not to be used to knowingly perpetuate terrorism, violence, and genocide.
Of course, this does not mean that action at the network layer should be taken against responsible managed service operators and application-layer platforms that make good faith efforts to respond to abuse reports. It is bad-faith clients seeking to avoid accountability that have no place among our community.
We're not naive about the possibility that Kiwi Farms will survive for a period of time on Tor, with anonymous providers, but only its most dedicated users will follow it there; anti-fascist researchers will be able to gather evidence every step of the way, and digital attacks that are not turnkey to mitigate are a persistent reality on the dark web. Decreasing the visibility and access to genocidal rhetoric has a provable amount of benefit in harm reduction, and the site’s economic viability diminishes when it lacks free rein to fundraise and further radicalize others. The impossibility of fully deplatforming hate does not mean we must hand hate a megaphone or weapon.
"and digital attacks that are not turnkey to mitigate are a persistent reality on the dark web", openly admitting they will continue to DDoS Tor just to get KF.
This part in particular very literally sounds like it was written by Liz Fong Jones:
"Our systems are designed for every network operator to act in good faith and assume others are acting in good faith when passing on reports or concerns, but what if they aren't? What if they are threatening our colleagues with harassment and violence?
What recourse do we have if the holder of a RIR-assigned netblock is using it specifically to harm people with no legitimate purpose? What if they refuse to take action on any reports of abuse because they themselves are the ones perpetuating abuse? What if the holder of an AS designation insists you peer with them on the same terms other paying transit clients do, pinky swears that they'll abide by your ToS and have an abuse contact, yet ignores the abuse reports, or worse, retaliates against those who report abuse?"
Well Liz ou have two options: LE and the courts, but you are far-left ACAB technoanarchists who despise both, so you've resorted to committing cybercrimes to get your way... BECAUSE YOU KNOW THE LAW IS NOT ON YOUR SIDE!
DROP (Don't Route or Peer) is an effective technique that we have used for decades to manage abusive actors.
But you are not using DROP, you are using DDoSing, hacking, user data stealing, digital hostage taking and open blackmail of ISPs with 48 hour ultimatums. The lists you've published on Github aren't DROP lists, they are DDoS hitlists that you pass around to your fellow cybercriminals, so they can DDoS KF's ISP and peers, while you attack the front office with an e-mail bomb of false abuse reports.
For those of you who are new to this thread and don't know what I am referring to, go to the Grayhat Academy Github account and look at the DDoS hitlists that are maintained there. They are being regularly updated with the latest #DropKiwiFarms targets by Liz and Kevin Karhan. On Github they'll falsely claim that these DDoS hitlists are supposedly "just" regular DROP lists, but we all know that's bullshit. They're lying about these being DROP lists so that Github will allow them to keep using their accounts to commit cybercrimes against KiwiFarms while superficially appearing to act legit. In reality, these are the DDoS hitlists that they distribute to the people carrying about these attacks. This is what they use to blackmail ISP and carriers openly on Twatter, with 48 ultimatums openly threatening to add them to these lists.
The GrayHat Academy DDoS hitlists were first share on Twatter here, in a tweet by Kevin Karhan:
Have a look at them for yourselves:
archived 21 Oct 2022 19:57:20 UTC
archive.ph
archived 21 Oct 2022 20:00:33 UTC
archive.ph
archived 21 Oct 2022 20:04:27 UTC
archive.ph
The impossibility of fully deplatforming hate does not mean we must hand hate a megaphone or weapon.
Oh, we all know how you feel about weapons, it's all Freudian hon, when you went and cut that dick off, you had to replace it with something else. I take solace in the fact that you are more likely to use your weapons to shoot yourselves on a bad day, with or without KF on the internet to blame for what you and only you did to yourselves.
They offer an API, so presumably someone is automating with it. The last scan I saw originated in Australia, where Elliot spends a lot of time.
I checked
https://urlscan.io again today, and lo behold, Kiwifarms.net no longer constantly appears in that list on the frontpage every 10 seconds. It still shows up occasionally, but much less frequently than yesterday:
In other words: Liz is obsessively hate-lurking at this forum. He saw my posts where I was pointing out that "someone" was URLscanning KF every 10 seconds, and even Liz must've realized how obsessed that looks. I am guessing that Liz has now made his obsessive URLscans private (which is an option according to
their FAQ) to save himself the embarrassment (FU, you're still an embarrassment). Or is there a way to prevent your site from being URLscanned? Like a robots.txt entry you can put in there to opt out?
Edit: according to their FAQ you have to mail Urlscan.io to opt out of being scanned by them:
Q: Can you prevent my domain from being scanned? Can you bulk-delete existing scans?
A: Yes, please send us a email at info@urlscan.io with the domains or URL patterns you'd like us to add to our blocking list and/or would like us to remove from historical scans.
LMAO, can you imagine what would happen if the ISPs and sites targeted by Liz all contacted urlcan.io and opted out? He'd go apeshit.
Liz also uses the website
https://bgp.tools/ BGP stands for Border Gateway Protocol, that's the protocol that individual ie "autonomous" networks use to communicate with one another. When a rare ISP with a spine
tells Liz to fuck off with his e-mail bombs flooding their abuse dept and his DDoS blackmail, Liz then uses this BGP.tools website to figure out how escalate his crybully bullshit to the networks that the ISP uses to communicate with the rest of the internet. Because there are less of these than there are ISPs, they can make or break an ISP. That's what allows Liz to "break the internet". When you see these cybercriminals on Twatter using the term "de-peering", this is what they are referring to. They escalate their abuse mail-bombs and their DDoS blackmail to the peers, who will then threaten to "de-peer" whatever ISP is hosting KF. This is so fucking unfair because there is no balance of power here, it's a blatantly stacked deck where the peers have all the power. It's these huge-ass peers ganging up on a lowly ISP to force their hand upon against even more powerless website. I do feel sorry for Null, because he's been trying to explain these things to people for years, but because of the instantaneous nature of the internet, people have a hard time imagining these abstract concepts. I think this is especially true for zoomers who have grown up with the internet and expect it to just be there, everywhere, like it's in the air or something. But this is really the material stuff that the internet is made of, these are the blatantly hierarchical relationships, that the supposedly free flow of information is contingent on. Everyone's data flow at the mercy of fucking SJW politicized censorious peers.
What's this EndKiwiFarms site, do we know?
The language seems more LizFong than Sinseer? But not fully sure.
It's likely a website run by Liz, see above for the Github copy suggesting he's behind it. Also the language is similar to Liz.
I'm willing to bet that it's LFJ.
Me too.
It could also be
Kevin Karhan (Kevin Katze), but I think what's most notable is that it is for sure not John "Sinseer" and that it is using a generic brand (EndKiwiFarms) that is a synonym for #DropKiwiFarms.
No fucking way, have you read Kevin's tweets? Kevin is German, and he's mentally ill. He sounds like a fucking unhinged borderline violent German mental patient. He doesn't sound anything like Liz, and there's no way he would've written this.
Lmao, how embarrassing. Imagine just sitting there seething and obsessing over KF all day, while everyone else is having fun. Troons really actively choose to be miserable.
There are thousands of results, all from the same IP.
Edit: Given the amount of scans, did he buy
a subscription just to spy on KF? They start at
199$/month
I saw that too, that it was all from Australia, and I thought that was another indication it was Liz. (Though if you look closely at their interface under "options", you can select to make it look like you're scanning from Australia. I''d guess he selected that.)
Daily Dilation of Stinkditch must have begun, I've switched over to TOR.
LMAO, I actually love this as a metaphor for the DDoS, I'm stealing it.
I am running pirated software right now, Gab. Does that make you angry, that I refuse to make Microsoft and Google rich? Everything on my computer, from the OS, to this browser, all of it, is 100% pirated. All the trannie porn on my computer is also pirated cos fuck all you sex worker trannies. I will break into a house, steal everything and then steal the house itself. I will buy nothing from anyone ever. If the internet is broken anyway, let's bankrupt it.