𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

I remember Null saying that 9chan was ruined when he allowed loli because surprise surprise they posted the real stuff when he wasn't looking. Time will tell if Cohost will allow pedophiles on their site like twitter does or not.
If that's being brought to the table for discussion already then it will be. They will certainly allow it. and then kid diddlers like @ryu289 and @Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg will have a place for a relief for their depravity. also collection of evidence that they are greasy pedos that need to be shot at the wall.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Markass the Worst
1667443705291302.jpg

Musk is a spineless cuck, but watching the fart huffing faggots seethe is fun. 5/10
 
At this point anybody who cites xkcd should be automatically disregarded. Between xkcd 1357 (the "censorship is okay when private companies do it!" one) and the amount of strawmanning Randall Munroe does, citing xkcd is less credible than citing your ass.
Agreed wholeheartedly, but sometimes it's fun to throw it back against those who worship every silly stick figure of his.

1667679437542.png
 
More doomposting. Twitterfags doompost more on a live working site than kiwis did when KF actually genuinely went down and that's saying something.

View attachment 3801804View attachment 3801800View attachment 3801796
source (a)

At this point anybody who cites xkcd should be automatically disregarded. Between xkcd 1357 (the "censorship is okay when private companies do it!" one) and the amount of strawmanning Randall Munroe does, citing xkcd is less credible than citing your ass.
I have multiple things to say about it:
1. Twitter is basic bitch webpage design, there is absolutely nothing in it that can't be easily replaced or traced back. And if your company is completely dependent on a worker that doesn't document his work then it is doomed anyways. Probably the only convoluted thing about the code will be the censorship algorithm that is more harm than worth.
2. The argument is that Musk is going to fire the guy working for Twitter the last decade rather than the massive amount of middle management and danger hair which can't code for shit.
3. Those people have probably not put the same smarmy image when people got fired for not getting vaxxed.
 
Agreed wholeheartedly, but sometimes it's fun to throw it back against those who worship every silly stick figure of his.

View attachment 3802656
He is right about this, but this doesn't cover the most egregious case of making up shit on Wikipedia: Mainstream news articles citing what some idiot on twitter says, which gives Wikipedia license to put it in the article. Which is what is done to justify the claim that "Kiwifarms harassed and murdered 3 people to suicide."
 
With tech companies it makes sense to keep people on board that know the code that is the heart of your business.

But Musk was firing people like the curators of the trending page. The site isn't going to fall apart because of dumbasses that worked those jobs being forced out. For whatever reason, a lot of people are treating the moderators as equivalent to the coders, which just doesn't make sense.
 
With tech companies it makes sense to keep people on board that know the code that is the heart of your business.

But Musk was firing people like the curators of the trending page. The site isn't going to fall apart because of dumbasses that worked those jobs being forced out. For whatever reason, a lot of people are treating the moderators as equivalent to the coders, which just doesn't make sense.
He did remove a number of the actual code engineers... but he also had his own staff from tesla looking at the code. I'd be surprised if they -didn't- do a pass to determine what they could handle and what was too obscure to remove anyone important for... yet.
 
More doomposting. Twitterfags doompost more on a live working site than kiwis did when KF actually genuinely went down and that's saying something.

View attachment 3801804View attachment 3801800View attachment 3801796
source (a)

At this point anybody who cites xkcd should be automatically disregarded. Between xkcd 1357 (the "censorship is okay when private companies do it!" one) and the amount of strawmanning Randall Munroe does, citing xkcd is less credible than citing your ass.
1667686698439.png
This is a picture of m00t, Randall Monroe (xkcd), and Ryan North (Dinosaur Comics, Adventure Time, Squirrel Girl) in 2008.
1667686908372.png
You can watch the full panel here: https://archive.org/details/RespectablyFrench.ROFLCon.Internet_Cult_Leader
1667687042993.png
 
I personally don't really care what musk does to the website, because it'll be a win regardless.

If musk kills the website, it'll be a win, because this shithouse of a website will no longer have any say in public discourse and SJW faggots would fuck off back to tumblr and livejournal.

If musk improves the website, it'll be a win, because the SJW faggots will naturally fuck off back to tumblr or Livejournal because their shitty ideas/thoughts would be challenged by normal thinking people.

The only way that website would be a loss would be if it doesn't change at all, and we have seen it's quite the opposite with half of the employees being fired. Things are definitely shaking up.
 
I recall Twitter had some hand-changing at some point, like shortly before Jack ended up leaving the company, and I swear despite the supposed big shake-up at the top it felt like absolutely nothing of note changed. Not features, not moderation, not anything. Meanwhile if nothing else it seems like Elon has a lot of plans for transforming the place, good or bad.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Markass the Worst
'You're fucking with my support system'. Fucking christ dude if Twitter is your support system and getting validated by internet people is causing you to have a nervous breakdown, you know what, I don't even have a response, that's just sad as fuck. Grow up dude.
 
Back