- Joined
- Apr 28, 2022
Echoing other people in the thread, I feel like Nyk is definitely a man to say, the pizza guy, if you get my drift. Wait, that sounds like a PizzaGate thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nyk doesn't like free speech on Twatter, LMAOOO
View attachment 3759394
If you stay on Twatter you're eventually gonna need therapy, Nyk.
View attachment 3759398
And speaking of the new free speech regime on Twatter, guess who got censored (permabanned!) on Reddit and couldn't take it, LMAO:
View attachment 3759404View attachment 3759406View attachment 3759414View attachment 3759418View attachment 3759420
Karma is the censoring bitch you end up with Neel, don't say we didn't warn you.
You laid your censorious bed, now you lie in it.
Look, I don't wanna powerlevel myself here but if these POS decide to go after Joshua Moon legally... I will do what I can and have already taken steps towards that. Let's just leave it at that.dudes stop doompoasting the site will be fine, Jersh is a one man army, the stakes are far higher than a few obnoxious trannies, considering they want to change how the web works.
Instead of preparing for alternatives, think of how you can help Jersh remain online. These whores are organizing and creating movements against us. We cannot be forever atomized individuals, at one point we'll have to organize and fight back instead of fleeing from site to site for some slurs and harsh jokes.
Chin up ladies and gents and support Jersh.
I do wonder that myself. Contra has stated the case an awful lot that Chris Chan/Yaniv types don't represent the trans community, but then has no problem taking a screenshot of someone saying something cancellable and saying THIS is what THEY want. He's either too dumb to notice the contradiction or too dishonest to care.Parrott has always had a problem taking trolls too seriously, whether it was Milo Yiannopoulos fatshaming people in 2016 or randos tweeting the N word at him in current year. It's one of his autistic little quirks.
I've watched some of the smartest people I knew become way too involved with the internet and various political internet bullshit, and I've watched them literally lose their minds over it.
I don't want to go off topic, but 8chan is still up on the clearnet. 9chan is gone but I feel like that was more due to little interest. As long as there is still interest in kiwi farms, we won’t meet the same fate as 8kun or 8chan.As toxic as this place is alleged to be, a site claimed to host "hate speech", it is one of the last bastions of free speech on the internet. A last remnant of the old internet before wrongthink police took over. The internet has been in the process of being scrubbed clean and if KF goes where will we go? Some Discord server that only a few people know about? In the last 2 years I've seen 8chan and now 9chan become obsolete. Without alternative sites there will be less opposition to the left's agenda, to their authority, and their rule of government.
Parrott has thrown a lot of people under the bus for the sake of his audience. In one of his 2016 video responses, he says he appreciates The Amazing Atheist’s self-awareness of calling his audience “THESE BRAINLESS FUCKING INSECTS”Get on the list, Nyk.
In other news, some of you might recognize this video:
Indeed, it was the same famous video of Christopher Hitchens defending free speech, that Nyk once decided to argue against in his Does The Left Hate Free Speech Part 1 video:
Nyk's whole argument against Hitchens is summarized in this one line: "Well, don't think we don't notice which instances of speech you choose to defend.". Nyk's argument being that rational skeptics defending free speech prefer to defend or "platform" abominable or criminal speech like Holocaust denial over the marginalized speech of blacks, gays and women, and that skeptics defending criminal speech over marginalized voices is ultimately due to some kind of disavowed internalized supremacy on their part:
Nyk, you even you in your drunken stupor should be able to understand the difference between ILLEGAL speech - which Holocaust denial definitely is in much of Europe, it's a speech offense for which people are constantly prosecuted - and marginalized speech that is still legal and permitted to be expressed, right? Criminalized speech is by definition more marginal than marginalized speech even. Anyone making an argument for free speech absolutism, like Hitchens is in this video, is not going to take a form of legal speech as a titillating example, he is going to take the most illegal speech as an example and argue why it should still be legal and in fact protected. That's real steel-manning. The fact that Hitchens also doesn't want to be interrupted by a 9/11 truther doesn't mean he's being a hypocrite about this. It means that he recognizes the difference between giving someone the floor in a controlled environment- because you want to debate them openly and show them to be wrong before an audience - and someone aggressively demanding the mike when it's not welcomed or warranted.
Looking back at this video 5 years after the fact, I immediately notice how much more expressive Nyk's face was at the time, before the FFS botched his face. How much more alive, involved and intent he seemed about his arguments. Nyk would refer to himself as a "jaded degenerate" at the time, but he is more bored and jaded today than he was back then.
Yet at the same time, this video is Nyk's rejection of rationality. Nyk openly rejected rationality by throwing under the bus an old idol and exemplar of his, in order to declare his allegiance to the un-thinking and irrationality of the SJW TRA cult. Nyk had to openly denounce one of his intellectual influences in order to be accepted into the cult, so he promptly did just that. I therefore view this video of Nyk denouncing Christopher Hitchen's free speech defense as a form of "intellectual patricide" on Nyk's part.
Nyk's whole argument against Hitchens is summarized in this one line: "Well, don't think we don't notice which instances of speech you choose to defend.". Nyk's argument being that rational skeptics defending free speech prefer to defend or "platform" abominable or criminal speech like Holocaust denial over the marginalized speech of blacks, gays and women, and that skeptics defending criminal speech over marginalized voices is ultimately due to some kind of disavowed internalized supremacy on their part:
Nyk, you even you in your drunken stupor should be able to understand the difference between ILLEGAL speech - which Holocaust denial definitely is in much of Europe, it's a speech offense for which people are constantly prosecuted - and marginalized speech that is still legal and permitted to be expressed, right? Criminalized speech is by definition more marginal than marginalized speech even. Anyone making an argument for free speech absolutism, like Hitchens is in this video, is not going to take a form of legal speech as a titillating example, he is going to take the most illegal speech as an example and argue why it should still be legal and in fact protected. That's real steel-manning. The fact that Hitchens also doesn't want to be interrupted by a 9/11 truther doesn't mean he's being a hypocrite about this. It means that he recognizes the difference between giving someone the floor in a controlled environment- because you want to debate them openly and show them to be wrong before an audience - and someone aggressively demanding the mike when it's not welcomed or warranted.
Looking back at this video 5 years after the fact, I immediately notice how much more expressive Nyk's face was at the time, before the FFS botched his face. How much more alive, involved and intent he seemed about his arguments. Nyk would refer to himself as a "jaded degenerate" at the time, but he is more bored and jaded today than he was back then.
Yet at the same time, this video is Nyk's rejection of rationality. Nyk openly rejected rationality by throwing under the bus an old idol and exemplar of his, in order to declare his allegiance to the un-thinking and irrationality of the SJW TRA cult. Nyk had to openly denounce one of his intellectual influences in order to be accepted into the cult, so he promptly did just that. I therefore view this video of Nyk denouncing Christopher Hitchen's free speech defense as a form of "intellectual patricide" on Nyk's part.
There is a strong network of activists, advocates, and supporters that have the capacity, interest, and dedication to fully support the organization and help meet its financial, programmatic, and policy goals. I encourage folks to step forward to ensure that the organization’s future can be secured. Our clients and community deserve a functioning, ethical, and anti-racist board.
I am not going to lie to you all, I am terrified of speaking out against what is now a concentrated small group of white affluent professionals, who have forgone any meaningful conversation about Board transition or new Board leadership. I declined their offers of severance and silence, still insisting on new Board leadership as a condition of departure. Instead, they escalated to threats of legal action. They used our clients and our staff as pawns to spurn guilt, holding them hostage to maintain their power, and freezing or organization’s activities.
Whistleblowing: Public Call for the Resignation of the FreeState Board of Directors
This morning, I requested the FreeState Justice Board of Directors to submit their immediate resignations due to persistent violations of our board handbook, consistent failures in their fiduciary res...web.archive.org
When I joined FreeState Justice as a staff attorney in 2019, our pro bono legal services program had become centered almost entirely on name and gender change cases for transgender individuals. While it was inevitable that this would be the largest class of cases by absolute numbers, they had become existentially centric to the legal services program’s raison d’être that the bulk of legal staff were spending 100% of their time on name and gender change matters, and nearly all pro bono placement and recruitment efforts were focused on these matters.
"What Makes a Trans Chick Cool?"The more things change the more they stay the same, I guess. Despite all the grueling and botched physical changes Nyk's put himself through, his typical MO from the very beginning all the way to today hasn't budged an inch. Constantly polluting the online space with arguments that are blatantly cynical, misleading, straw manned and done in bad-faith, with a heaping side of self-aggrandizement and a deeply held persecution complex which are all ultimately rooted in a spiteful misanthropic hatred towards the dumb inferior masses he considers bigoted and beneath him. And don't forget our special guest: armchair psychoanalysis - thrown in for good measure to not only give himself the trappings of superior intellect and authority but to also further radicalize his cult audience by implying that the targets of the glorified hit pieces he calls "video essays" aren't just merely mistaken, but are actually, ontologically evil and thus deserving of severe, unrelenting punishment.
I wish we could all just dismiss Nyk as a lone nut job, but as someone old enough to remember how open and fun the internet used to be in the before time its absolutely tragic how completely normalized this particular brand of psychotic anti-discourse has gotten. I mean, how many major sites haven't gotten substantially more toxic and censorious over the past decade or so? Still, it might be interesting to look back on Nyk's older videos just to see how well his arguments have held up, or rather how well they haven't. Like his Cancelling video, for instance, where he defended James Charles from the "mob" who were too quick to judge him after Tati's first video... only for it to turn out James actually was sexually harassing underage straight guys all along. Or his Cringe video where he scolds the internet meanies for gawking at Chris-Chan's increasingly disturbed behavior... only for Chris to later confess to raping his own mother. I'm sure there are many other examples you guys can think of but it seems to me like the talking points Nyk comes up with in his videos have a tendency to age almost as poorly as he has.
Could be a legacy checkmark, like DSP'sBTW, I just looked up Nyk's Twatter account and apparently he still has the check mark. Does that mean he paid Elon Musk the $8 to keep it? LMAO
Yeah, I just read Elon Musk's tweet about the legacy checkmarks. Nyk's @contrapoints Twatter account is from 2009 but I don't think he got verified until 2021.Could be a legacy checkmark, like DSP's