US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

 

[Die Dunkle Maus]

It's not my fault GOP candidates were beaten by corpses.

I'm going to assume that since I've never heard of what you're describing that you're making shit up. Even if it's true, why should I be held accountable for what someone else is doing? And why would you want help from people you're accusing of being pedophiles?

"Help us win, you repulsive pond scum."

Maybe you're thinking of left Libertarians.

Don't panic! It means he accepts you as an equal.

Republicans- Fundamentalist repressed homosexuals and closeted pedophiles, per Ds and third party.
Democrats- Satanic homosexuals and pedophile groomers, per Rs and third party.
Third party- Atheist homosexuals and pedophiles per Ds and Rs.

YOU'RE ONE OF US

 

[Potatoherder]

Ron DeSantis can't win the rust belt. A Republican pretty much needs the rust belt to win the presidency now.

They need the rust-belt and sun-belt to win and both of those do very poorly with basic-bitch republicans. The minute Ron starts talking about lower taxes it'll be lost.

 

[Eggplant Wizard]

just like little jimmy is winning until dad grabs the belt.

the problem is, there is no "winning". there is no leftist utopia (or fourth reich for that matter).
look at it this way, the vast majority doesn't really care about politics. why? because it doesn't really matter to them. left, right, uniparty, in a saner world it's still all the same in the end. the assumption is that everyone involved has a vested self-interest to keep the wheel spinning somewhere in the middle - the establishment so it can grift, the plebs to consoom etc.
however, any "win" in that scenario is knocking over the wheel, and then what? it doesn't matter from which direction the wheel is knocked over, down is down.

and even if they "win" for a moment, it's simply not sustainable. you can see it already where mediocrity gets promoted for the sake for "diversity, inclusion, equity", what do you expect to happen? same way nazi germany would have inevitably imploded (heritage over merit). same way russia did (party over merit), asf.

the obvious example is weimar, which was winning really hard too - till they didn't.
honestly, I blame historians for that shit, since they can't stop jerking themselves off over HITLER: RISE OF EVIL, putting it like he was grima wormtongue (or whoever the harry potter equivalent is for libtards), when in reality people VOTED for him. in a DEMOCRACY. weimar was a FEDERAL REPUBLIC (sound familiar?). I get it, politics are boring, foreign ones even more so, it's simply much easier to whine about MUH NAZIS than ask grandma - if you're old enough to have one who lived back then - why she did it. and then she's gonna tell you shit got so bad that they were ok with anyone promise to fix it. and he did fix it (for a while), even if it meant the nice jewish family next door gets picked up at 4am.

TLDR: there doesn't need to be a (cold) civil war, history is circular anyway.

Probably late, but Hitler wasn’t elected, he was appointed Chancellor. It was an attempt to get him to be talked down from the radicalism he was shouting. Then the President died, Hitler had emergency powers from when a commie set a gov’t building on fire, so he made himself the ruler of Germany. The Nazis didn’t have a veto-proof majority until they made it illegal to not be a Nazi party member. They didn‘t get elected for reason at all, they had around 1/3 of the country because of ANTIFA beating the shit out of people for not voting communist.

 

[make_it_so]

It’s always amazing how easily impressed and convinced the right can be to support somebody. Especially when they try to act like they aren’t.

Dude, you need to not take shitposts so seriously.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Don't panic! It means he accepts you as an equal.

Republicans- Fundamentalist repressed homosexuals and closeted pedophiles, per Ds and third party.
Democrats- Satanic homosexuals and pedophile groomers, per Rs and third party.
Third party- Atheist homosexuals and pedophiles per Ds and Rs.

YOU'RE ONE OF US

I don't recall Libertarians making this a common accusation of Republicans, seeing as how they both have common interests I imagined it was basically the same group but under different banners.

 

[Eggplant Wizard]

If I ever get elected to office, I solemnly swear to say the following upon finding a microphone:

Pee is stored in the balls.

Please do this. Also make a list of more things to say and just make sure to go down it just so I can watch the media rage at you.

 

[Die Dunkle Maus]

I don't recall Libertarians making this a common accusation of Republicans, seeing as how they both have common interests I imagined it was basically the same group but under different banners.

Okay, third partiers never said that. You got me, none of the millions of third party members ever made such spurious claims!

I'm obviously a government agent.

 

[RichardMongler]

Can someone tell me what problem libtards have with Mitch McConnell apart from being a fossil politician with an R in his party affiliation? I recall them scaremongering about muh Russia and some oligarch starting a firm in Kentucky, but what else are libtards ginning their base up on old ass Mitch?

I don't like him either. I just want to dislike him for better reasons than them.

 

[Individualism Incarnate]

Since we're on page 1945, a message to Neil Degrasshole:
View attachment 3843075
This is what you're dooming our future to by spewing your lies about nuclear weapons. I hope you're proud of yourself, you fucking dumbass nigger.

You're expecting a nigger to show empathy for a human. Good luck with that.

 

[verissimus]

Can someone tell me what problem libtards have with Mitch McConnell apart from being a fossil politician with an R in his party affiliation? I recall them scaremongering about muh Russia and some oligarch starting a firm in Kentucky, but what else are libtards ginning their base up on old ass Mitch?

I don't like him either. I just want to dislike him for better reasons than them.

Does there have to be a deeper reasoning for them to hate McConnell though? This is the Left we're talking about. They'll gladly eat their own if they fall out of line or become a liability.

 

[Kane Lives]

Can someone tell me what problem libtards have with Mitch McConnell apart from being a fossil politician with an R in his party affiliation? I recall them scaremongering about muh Russia and some oligarch starting a firm in Kentucky, but what else are libtards ginning their base up on old ass Mitch?

I don't like him either. I just want to dislike him for better reasons than them.

I mean, he did cockblock the Dems on Merrick Garland and the filibuster thing.

 

[The Big O]

I mean, he did cockblock the Dems on Merrick Garland and the filibuster thing.

Loathsome as Cocaine Mitch is, he did help the country dodge some serious bullets by denying Merrick Garland from a SCOTUS seat. You need only look at how much of a weasely little tyrant Cheka Police wannabe he's acting as Attorney General and be grateful the Turtle nixed him. Garland would be pissing on the constitution day in and day out.

 

[Lodoss Warrior]

I like Trump; I like DeSantis; I, therefore, like them together.

Simple as.

 

[Curly_]

Hey, you've had two years to show off all of them manufactured fraudulent ballots, what happened?

Even if you can't produce the actual ballots, the votes are still recorded; let's see the records.

Or, at least, let's show that the records were destroyed? Something, right?

As Wisconsin has shown, the secret sauce behind the Democrat cheating is that, for all intents and purposes, their fake votes are legitimate. In 2020, retirement homes had some alarmingly high turnout, and it's clear that's because the Dems are just using them and similar sources to harvest votes.

 

[Die Dunkle Maus]

As Wisconsin has shown, the secret sauce behind the Democrat cheating is that, for all intents and purposes, their fake votes are legitimate. In 2020, retirement homes had some alarmingly high turnout, and it's clear that's because the Dems are just using them and similar sources to harvest votes.

Oh, I know about all of the LEGAL shenanigans they're up to! That's kind of my point.

They don't need to cheat. Both political parties are invested in winning, they have BOTH set up our election process.

They don't have to manufacture ballots, or use dead voters; all they have to be willing to do is spend a lot of money, and they'll get returns.

 

[George Lucas]

Can someone tell me what problem libtards have with Mitch McConnell apart from being a fossil politician with an R in his party affiliation? I recall them scaremongering about muh Russia and some oligarch starting a firm in Kentucky, but what else are libtards ginning their base up on old ass Mitch?

I don't like him either. I just want to dislike him for better reasons than them.

McConnell is responsible for our conservative-leaning Federal courts.

 

[Breadbassket]

McConnell is responsible for our conservative-leaning Federal courts.

You don't have to like McConnell but one can respect or at the very least acknowledge his masterful skill to leverage and take advantage of seemingly arcane Capitol Hill protocol and procedure.

 

[Puff]

You don't have to like McConnell but one can respect or at the very least acknowledge his masterful skill to leverage and take advantage of seemingly arcane Capitol Hill protocol and procedure.

If his goals were aligned with mine he'd be an asset.

 

[Curly_]

Oh, I know about all of the LEGAL shenanigans they're up to! That's kind of my point.

They don't need to cheat. Both political parties are invested in winning, they have BOTH set up our election process.

They don't have to manufacture ballots, or use dead voters; all they have to be willing to do is spend a lot of money, and they'll get returns.

Right, because having Dem operatives go to nursing homes and fill out ballots for senile old folks barely aware of their surroundings and doling them out until the Democrat candidate wins is 100% fair and legal and totally not cheating. The votes are effectively manufactured, but you'd never be able to separate them out from the rest.

 

[Die Dunkle Maus]

Right, because having Dem operatives go to nursing homes and fill out ballots for senile old folks barely aware of their surroundings and doling them out until the Democrat candidate wins is 100% fair and legal and totally not cheating.

Oh, it's cheating. But it's not ILLEGAL. Of course, I'm not a lawyer, maybe it's illegal now for old people of questionable senility to vote.

But that would be weird... they let them run for office.

Unfortunately, we live in a world were irresponsible people make 50 false claims (like manufacturing ballots, tens of thousands of dead voters, etc), while in the real world they're literally buying votes LEGALLY.