The fact that they removed the very obvious "promotable=no code" and rushed to hide and replace it with something less transparent was proof enough for me
They'd have hidden the 'robots = noindex' tag too if they could, but hiding a page from appearing on Google
requires that tag to be publicly visible so their webcrawler can catch it. In the past Indiegogo has been very direct when someone crosses their draconian rules and they feel they're in a position to dictate terms (as you can personally attest); this shift to subterfuge and refusing to disclose the issue while under public pressure implies to me that the issue may not necessarily be something within their control. Although JDA argues in his video that the blackout on communications is a post-Teddy Spaghetti legal tactic to urge CG towards the door in a way that does not leave them open for a lawsuit.
While in the Comicsgate mythos platforms like Kickstarter (and now Indiegogo I guess) play the role tyrannical woke monoliths oppressing the entrepreneurial CG little guy, in the greater scheme of things crowdfund platforms are merely the next highest step in a global hierarchical finance pyramid, escrows and middlemen at the complete and total mercy of the payment processors that can and
often do issue top-down fiats to client companies that are reliant on them to terminate the services of designated cancelled people.
If what's happening is because Indiegogo is a (very badly managed) reaction to pressure from a source they themselves have to answer to, like their payment processor, then it doesn't matter if CG publicly burns its bridges with Indiegogo and flounces off to Kickstarter or wherever. Kickstarter and Indiegogo both rely on the same payment processor, Stripe Inc, and if they're the ones that are the source of the pressure on these platforms on behalf of some troon cancel activist campaign, it makes me ask: "Will the next place Comicsgate decides to mass-move to bother with a shadowban under similar pressure, or will they just simply terminate their campaigns?"
Indiegogo still accepting CG business in exchange for 10% of their campaigns not being visible on a google search that account for a negligible amount of funding, may be light compared to the treatment CG may face if they take their business elsewhere.
Whatever the case, this situation is why I've always argued that the idea of "crowdfund platform exclusivity", and actually purity testing would-be members on the issue was incredibly retarded from the get go. The goal is to exchange money for a comic;
how that's done shouldn't be important.
Anyways, the Comicsgate sector is reacting to this in a number of ways.
Michael Bancroft sounded the call to action by
asking his followers if there was a way to do a blanket search for campaigns that by definition do not appear on any searches. If you're reading this Bancroft: fuck you.
Dojo Kun Comics, possibly more substantively,
threatens to bring his credentials as a federal fraud investigator to bear against IndieGogo's suspected malfeasance against Comicsgate. If nothing else, this may stand a higher chance of breaking Indiegogo's silence.
Shane Davis wife, inker and superchat mongler
Yanzi Lin threw together
a wordpress page holding some manually added links to active crowdfund campaigns, "Comicsgreats.com" will no doubt be a fine new addition ot the other comicsgate campaign aggregators that already exist but nobody knows about or uses like IndieCron, CreatorGo and CGNow.
Simple Zack decided to weigh in on the shadowbanning. He did a "cursory inspection" of some content he viewed somewhere which leads him to believe that it
is happening. He then gets sidetracked with a boomer rant about how search engines were better 20 years ago. Back on track - he confirms that some creators are shadowbanned. Some of the afflicted are what Meyer characterizes as "normie", and others as "controversial". It is totally inconsistent. But what does 'shadowbanned' mean really? It's a meaningless term. Voting in Zack's experience is also meaningless, since he's on the subject. Sometimes words are filtered in the comments his youtube community page; he's noticed posts containing the word 'commie' are held for review. It doesn't make sense to Zack why the normies are eating a shadowban. Maybe, Zack posits, being shadowbanned is something you feel. He's reminded of certain trigger words like 'kill yourself' getting livesteams demonetized. There's a pattern in what's happening, but he just can't see it. Apparently there's a tool you can use to see if your campaign is demonetized?
This concludes Simple Zack's thoughts regarding the shadowbanning.
Frog, understanding that this is a time where leadership is needed,
snapped to action woke up at 7PM to
use his time productively debate balding autist Robert Setlock III aka "
Organized Chaos" on if Comicsgate is a hate movement or not. Robert enters the debate somewhat annoyed on account of Frog showing up two hours late. Bad internet connectivity due to the simulcast Setlock insists on having for fairness' sake makes the first half hour unlistenable, which Frog generously fills up with shilling Rekt Planet, repeating of the tenets of Comicsgate and its opposition to wokeness and overall banter and self-aggrandizement. Eventually though Organized Chaos turns his camera off, which improves latency enough to begin actual discourse.
Much like the debate with Nerdette, Setlock's approach is to simply lay out a series of leading questions along the lines of "what is wokeness?" and "prove to me a comic is woke" which would place Frog in the position to making the arguments to Organized Chaos' satisfaction as socratic interrogator and psuedo-arbiter of the debate. Which of course he would never concede no matter what the answer was, therefore making him the winner of the "debate" by default. Unfortunately for him, Frog had zero intention of answering any questions from Organized Chaos and has no respect for him or his opinions, and so immediately derails his cart from the debatical railroad tracks Setlock has constructed to go do donuts and tear the nearby lawn up into a mudpit while Setlock stands there unable to take a stance of actual opposition, as that would require abandoning his pretense as the would-be 'arbiter' of the validity of Frog's answers.
Frog is responsible for what Comicsgaters do? Okay then by
that logic Organized Chaos is responsible for everything SJWs do. Answer for Robbie Rodriguez showing Frog his butthole, Robert! If Frog doesn't deliver his comic books, what's this proof copy of
Rekt Planet doing in his hands? Buy now on Indiegogo! You just lied Robert! Frog regales the chat with long polemical monologues about how Organized Chaos is ontological evil and how it is Comicsgate's holy mission to oppose him. At one point Frog argues calling people things "soy" isn't homophobic, but instead taking all the negative characteristics once associated with being gay (effeminacy, weakness, etc) in a term that does not discriminate against sexual preference and assigning them to pussies and bitches like Robert. All the 5+ hour livestreams, sleeping in instead of showing up to the debate on time and hanging around TJ Dopeness seem to have paid off as Frog shows no sign of fatigue in giving speeches or overtalking Organized Chaos' repeated, ignored questioning.
Eventually someone in Setlock's chat along with Forced Adversity, sensing desperation, throws him a bone by throwing out the Darwyn Cooke thing from 2016. Frog reponds that that was a gayop, and also it was Billy Tucci who said that Darwyn would be Comicsgate, not him. And also Darwyn Cooke hated what leftists were doing to comics so he'd probably be CG if he was alive anyway. Organized Chaos asks "So you're saying you know him better than his wife does?", to which Frog replies "No I don't know what Darwyn Cooke's penis looks like". Setlock asks the same question a few more times, but Frog starts doing donuts again and also starts calling him a liar over and over, at which point an audibly fatigued Robert Setlock decides to retire for the evening, claiming victory on account of Frog "showing his ass" and getting him to say politically incorrect things. Whatever.
Finally, Vikki and Dean at
D&V Investigations released their findings into the matter of the Indiegogo shadowban against prominent Comicsgate campaigns. (Highly) paraphrasing as best I can, Vikki's thesis is that Comicsgate has developed a persistent business culture of flagrantly and regularly going against Indiegogo's Terms of Services, including such commonly accepted practices as using the campaign status update tool to send out notices for upcoming campaigns, exceeding the 90 day expected maximum between a campaign going into InDemand and fulfillment, and a number of other policy violations regarding sexual and violent content on what should be an all-ages platform that are all justifiable cause for being placed on a shadowban list.
The only thing that has changed is a turnover in Indiegogo's Trust and Safety handlers from one fraud detection agency to another, more efficient AI-powered enforcer, which came into effect at around October 15th, 2022 which was around when the first "shadowbannings" started to be noticed. In summation, Comicsgate campaigns are not being discriminated against or shadowbanned - Indiegogo creator accounts with an established history of TOS violation are - and claims otherwise amount to nothing but unfounded conspiracy theory.