0 0
--- .... / --.. . .-. ---
Forum Staff
🐕🦺 Animal Control 🐕🦺
💬 Off-Topic Mod 💬
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2017
I don't get the excuse either, Elliot's explanation of it makes zero sense and is oddly specific. But a little bit of hair that is somehow identifiable as a dog's doesn't give a person PTSD and suicidal ideation after encountering it, and can't be brushed under the rug (or fail to) as a "consent accident." A sexual assault fits all three parameters. Occam's razor.r8 me l8 but I’ve read through and still can’t understand the whole dog hair = rape = “consent accident” thing. But the fact that Liz himself calls it a “consent accident” makes me so sure it wasn’t just fucking dog hair.
At least now we know why he’s trying to burn down the Internet, though.
A "consent accident" can only be understood as a rape. There's zero alternate interpretations. And Elliot can't elaborate on it further because that would both require him to acknowledge his dumb statements and also shed further light on the encounter.