Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

My spider sense tells me that we should replace "extended to dog hair on other peoples' clothing"

As in "If I had known her phobia of dogs []. However there is literally no way I could have known, and she did not communicate that need"

The content within brackets I'd rather left to you.
You know, reading the "dog hair" story reminds me of the examples found in the essay "The Missing Missing Reasons." (It's an old Reddit favorite.)

TL;DR version: When individual narcissists lose an argument in real life, they'll go out and get validation by smearing their opponents in front of their friendly Internet followers. When they do this, they tend to follow a consistent pattern: They'll always leave out the main argument presented by the opposing party, and fixate on certain details without providing the necessary context (like "dog hair") to make their opponents seem irrational or unhinged. (They, of course, present themselves as the calm, rational parties.) Liz's "consent accident" victim told him exactly what happened that made her feel violated -- but Liz pretends to not have been told this. Make no mistake, though -- he was.

Because Liz won't mention the entire tale, I'm going to try to put it together using the clues provided:

I assume that the victim became incapacitated when Liz was present. When she woke up, Liz claimed that nothing out of the ordinary happened while she was out. However, Liz was done in by the tell-tale dog hair . . .

If you own a pet that sheds, you know that hair can get on your furniture. As a result, it can get on your clothing and it can transfer to the clothing and furniture of others. Do you know where it doesn't go? On your underwear, and certainly not inside of it. The only way it would get there is if you were disrobed in a "consent accident."

When Liz was confronted with this, he realized he was caught. When the story started to make the rounds and he knew it would get back to him, he went to the Internet to throw as much misdirection as possible to his Twitter followers -- using the same techniques outlined in the essay. However, if he was innocent of this he wouldn't need to do that -- let alone "regret it for the rest of [his] life." All he would have to do is to tell the full story.
 
You know, reading the "dog hair" story reminds me of the examples found in the essay "The Missing Missing Reasons." (It's an old Reddit favorite.)

TL;DR version: When individual narcissists lose an argument in real life, they'll go out and get validation by smearing their opponents in front of their friendly Internet followers. When they do this, they tend to follow a consistent pattern: They'll always leave out the main argument presented by the opposing party, and fixate on certain details without providing the necessary context (like "dog hair") to make their opponents seem irrational or unhinged. (They, of course, present themselves as the calm, rational parties.) Liz's "consent accident" victim told him exactly what happened that made her feel violated -- but Liz pretends to not have been told this. Make no mistake, though -- he was.

Because Liz won't mention the entire tale, I'm going to try to put it together using the clues provided:

I assume that the victim became incapacitated when Liz was present. When she woke up, Liz claimed that nothing out of the ordinary happened while she was out. However, Liz was done in by the tell-tale dog hair . . .

If you own a pet that sheds, you know that hair can get on your furniture. As a result, it can get on your clothing and it can transfer to the clothing and furniture of others. Do you know where it doesn't go? On your underwear, and certainly not inside of it. The only way it would get there is if you were disrobed in a "consent accident."

When Liz was confronted with this, he realized he was caught. When the story started to make the rounds and he knew it would get back to him, he went to the Internet to throw as much misdirection as possible to his Twitter followers -- using the same techniques outlined in the essay. However, if he was innocent of this he wouldn't need to do that -- let alone "regret it for the rest of [his] life." All he would have to do is to tell the full story.
I think this is the most plausible interpretation we've had so far. The Internet sleuths at Kiwi Farms crack another case.
detectivesped.jpg
Now if we could just hear the victims version of events, but unless Dong Gone doxes his victim, (and I wouldn't put it past him because he's a fucking scumbag) that's not likely to happen unless they decide to come here and share their story themself, which is possibly one of the reason the Donger tried so hard to shut us down.
 
unless they decide to come here and share their story themself

Hello, victim of accident consent.

If you are reading this, we understand that you have heard this site kills transgender people and that you might not want to be associated with it for many reasons. However, Kiwis have been rather non judgemental in cases like yours.

The site strongly discourages actively getting involved in drama and promotes commentary from a distance. However, there have been cases in the past where third parties who got negatively impacted by the individuals discussed approached the forum to talk about their first hand experience or point of view. This was the case of Doopiedoover or the transgender individuals targeted by Isabella L. Janke, whose identities were kept secret at request.

So, shall you be freaking out anybody from this forum will be looking for you after your incident with Fong-Jones was discussed, don't. Any user who would do that would be harshly punished. However, if you on your own will would like to set things straight about the exact nature of this incident with us, it would be considered of great interest and you would be treated respectfully by most people over here.
 
Raceplay is exactly what it sounds like, it is the fetishisation of racism. R/Raceplay has a sticker note declaring their support for BLM due to the amount of POC women seeking for white racists to call them a nigger or something like that.

Faithplay seems to be, oddly enough, a south asian phenomenon where south asian and middle eastern muslims fantasize about being harassed for being muslims and forcibly enslaved or converted by christians/hindus.
Why are people like this
 
Hypnosis is bullshit and anyone who does that because of "HEP ME AH BIN HIPMOTIZED" wanted to do it anyway.
Yeah but hypnotic suggestion combined with amyl nitrite, Ambien or other sedatives can fuck up even the most stalwart of moralists. If someone gets Micky'd that's a whole different problem.
 
My favorite Jizz-Dong is this:
View attachment 3859839
If I take the mask off, will you die?
It still blows my mind that LFJ wasted all that money to fly to Sydney and sit in the park on a picnic with like six other troons staring at a cake they didn't even eat in "protest" to CF.

Might have been a drop in the bucket for Ole Brick Face to do that, but goddammit if it isn't some of the funniest shit from this whole ordeal.
 
I think this is the most plausible interpretation we've had so far. The Internet sleuths at Kiwi Farms crack another case.
View attachment 3860013
Now if we could just hear the victims version of events, but unless Dong Gone doxes his victim, (and I wouldn't put it past him because he's a fucking scumbag) that's not likely to happen unless they decide to come here and share their story themself, which is possibly one of the reason the Donger tried so hard to shut us down.
Elliot is fucking terrified we find who his victim is. It only takes an autist with a lot of free time and looking at archived material to find them, though. I'm guessing he quietly deleted everything related to his Zurich visit before we made any investigations, though.
 
Elliot is fucking terrified we find who his victim is. It only takes an autist with a lot of free time and looking at archived material to find them, though. I'm guessing he quietly deleted everything related to his Zurich visit before we made any investigations, though.
Do we know what he was in Zurich doing?
At what event?
If we can find out where he was it shouldn't be too hard to find a list of attendees/guests maybe so we've got a list of possibles.
It would likely be someone he already knew so there are ways to cross reference and narrow it down.
This block faced piece of shit has tried to destroy the site, slandered our community and harassed Josh's business associates and people even tangentially connected to him.
I think he deserves a few more spotlights shone on his unsavory activities especially as he's a fucking rapist.
Do we at least know what event he was at and what dates?
It's a place to start.
 
Do we know what he was in Zurich doing?
At what event?
If we can find out where he was it shouldn't be too hard to find a list of attendees/guests maybe so we've got a list of possible.
It would likely be someone he already knew so there are ways to cross reference and narrow it down.
This block faced piece of shit has tried to destroy the site, slandered our community and harassed Josh's business associates and people even tangentially connected to him.
I think he deserves a few more spotlights shone on his unsavory activities especially as he's a fucking rapist.
Do we at least know what even he was at and what dates?
It's a place to start.
For me it's a tricky situation, as it can be either tech or BDSM related. Maybe even both. But yes, I think we can start collectively sperging about this situation while Elliot is on hiatus instead of talking about knitting and Moloch and pronouns.

This is a person Elliot claims to know for over eight years. Maybe a former googler now located in Zurich? It's weird, Elliot makes it seem like they were at his place. There's a few questions, though—was the victim residing in Zurich, did the rape happen in a hotel or a sex party, etc.
 
For me it's a tricky situation, as it can be either tech or BDSM related. Maybe even both. But yes, I think we can start collectively sperging about this situation while Elliot is on hiatus instead of talking about knitting and Moloch and pronouns.

This is a person Elliot claims to know for over eight years. Maybe a former googler now located in Zurich? It's weird, Elliot makes it seem like they were at his place. There's a few questions, though—was the victim residing in Zurich, did the rape happen in a hotel or a sex party, etc.
I mean he kicked the fucking nest, if he's going to starve us of updates and he's backing off on his fucking retarded campaign we might as well entertain ourselves in his absence.
Something scared him that's for sure, and Sun Tsu says when your enemies falter that's when you press them, don't give this Eunuch fuck chance to slink back into the shadows and lick his wounds, dilate his stinkditch and plot more fuckery in peace so he can turn up again like fucking Vordraks chink manservant to cause more shit later.
I can only speak for myself but now seems the time to teach this nasty little Gong Gong what FAAFO really means.
 
Back