Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

Liz story about dog hair is retarded and this is why:

Contrary to popular belief, you can't really bring your dog with you on intercontinental trips. There is a process with medicals, documents and shit that has to be sorted out and then the animal will still have to spend time in quaranteen.

Am I to believe that Liz got dog hair on his clothes from his dog, inside his home, then travelled for 24 hours to the other side of the planet. Checked into his hotel room, had a shower and went to bed.
Then next day, after the conference, there was a dog hair incident? How fucking long does dog hair stick to your clothes?
Do you never fucking change clothes?
 
Liz story about dog hair is retarded and this is why:

Contrary to popular belief, you can't really bring your dog with you on intercontinental trips. There is a process with medicals, documents and shit that has to be sorted out and then the animal will still have to spend time in quaranteen.

Am I to believe that Liz got dog hair on his clothes from his dog, inside his home, then travelled for 24 hours to the other side of the planet. Checked into his hotel room, had a shower and went to bed.
Then next day, after the conference, there was a dog hair incident? How fucking long does dog hair stick to your clothes?
Do you never fucking change clothes?
It’s not that I disagree with you about Liz’s story being bullshit, but have you ever owned an animal?? That shit is like fucking glitter: no matter how hard you try, you will find it EVERYWHERE.

As a side note, if someone invented a product that would reliably remove animal hair from clothes/etc in the wash, I would buy it immediately. I cannot overstate how much time I spend trying to get animal hair off my clothes/sheets/fucking everything, and I would pay handsomely.
 
had a shower
Yeah, that's why your theory falls flat.

That aside, there's no reason for anyone to believe the contrived dog hair garbage story. That sounds like something little Timmy will make up after being caught jerking it to the weather forecast lady. "I was trying to get the dog hair off my private part!"
 
The most recent comment he's made:
View attachment 3863076
Lot of authoritarian faggots in that thread trying to justify their Cancel Crusade.
ED1E2959-FA31-4945-B5FC-B0F0F9318837.png
 
On one hand, Liz is insane enough to willingly associate and have sex with individuals who believe that having dog hair on your body is sexual assault.

On the other, he is very rapey.

Wouldn’t be surprised either way. Either way he did this to himself. Don’t fuck crazy people bro.
 
Don’t fuck crazy people bro.
*Ahem*.... I believe the *correct* platitude is "Don't stick your dick in crazy," which Elliot can't anyway because he cut his off.

Maybe he's using a dildo or a strapon, maybe he's using his hand or a candle or a broomstick, but whatever he's raping with, it ain't his dick.
 
Sorry if this has been posted. Searched the thread and couldn’t find it.

Liz Fong-Jones’s own tragic #metoo:

Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 2.04.32 AM.png

Full text:
Liz Fong-Jones
Oct 20, 1:15 AM

[TW sexual assault] #metoo: I slept with a director* somewhere in Alphabet. He got very creative to maneuver past the letter of limits I set. But I didn't break it off. I kept seeing him until the day he was semi-publicly accused of (non-sexually) assaulting a woman [he claimed self-defense and that she struck first]. I feel bad about standing by and being "neutral" in that situation rather than backing the woman he'd assaulted and also sharing my story. I shouldn't have been "neutral" and thinking "both sides messed up but maybe I'd better stop just in case". But I was too wrapped up to see that he'd also hurt me, and that I should have believed the woman and said so loudly. And also, I'd kept seeing him, right? [see the linked Hairpin article]

And in retrospect, there were some warning signs. Like the fact that he said he'd made the mistake of sleeping with someone in his reporting chain at another employer in the past, and viewed sleeping with a distant coworker as tickling that same taboo in an innocuous way. He swore he'd never sleep with a reportee again and had learned from the mistake, but that should have set off alarm bells for me. Or the many other rumors circling about him in the sex-positive community, which I'd previously defended him from by saying I'd generally had a positive experience. In retrospect, you don't generally have a positive experience; it's bad outright unless it's something you unequivocally consented to... Having one or two fun experiences shouldn't cause one to feel obligated to keep seeing someone, or to tolerate pushing at boundaries. I wish I'd realized that earlier.

* Not naming names [because while I do condemn the assault, I'm not sure how to balance with outing people as sex-positive in the process :/]. No specific HR violation, he wasn't in my reporting chain, we met outside work rather than in a work context, everything was technically aboveboard in that department. And I don't think I really feel like reporting through official channels -- it'll be he said/she said, "you kept seeing him", and also get HR digging around my personal life.

[p.s. never, ever, ever let someone you don't trust super super well negotiate doing more things after you've already set limits and started doing things within those limits. but that's a victim-blamey phrasing. Phrasing it better from the other side: never, ever, ever renegotiate limits once your partner is no longer in a coherent frame of mind to negotiate limits]

[pps #metoo about having broken someone's trust and screwed up by accident with their limits in the past, but that's not my story to share. But this case wasn't accidental, at least based on the pattern of multiple other of his victims.]

https://archive.ph/u2PDx
 
Sorry if this has been posted. Searched the thread and couldn’t find it.

Liz Fong-Jones’s own tragic #metoo:

View attachment 3863421

Full text:


https://archive.ph/u2PDx
Literally 2-3h later he comments on his own post:
1668411405559.png

"A precommitment that I think allows striking correct balance between privacy of this person and security for anyone who also was hurt by this person:
elizabeth@lily:~$ echo -n "FirstName LastName Pseudonym" | sha256sum c707597c73a824049c75a378723b01d9e683a0a95f90cbe3694cbaec2146e757"

If you search for 'sha256 online' and enter Richard DeVaul Headcrash you get the same sha256 result:
1668411572845.png


What is SHA-256?​

The SHA (Secure Hash Algorithm) is one of a number of cryptographic hash functions. A cryptographic hash is like a signature for a data set. If you would like to compare two sets of raw data (source of the file, text or similar) it is always better to hash it and compare SHA256 values. It is like the fingerprints of the data. Even if only one symbol is changed the algorithm will produce different hash value. SHA256 algorithm generates an almost-unique, fixed size 256-bit (32-byte) hash. Hash is so called a one way function. This makes it suitable for checking integrity of your data, challenge hash authentication, anti-tamper, digital signatures, blockchain.

With the newest hardware (CPU and GPU) improvements it is become possible to decrypt SHA256 algorithm back. So it is no longer recommended to use it for password protection or other similar use cases. Some years ago you would protect your passwords from hackers by storing SHA256 encrypted password in the your data base. This is no longer a case.

SHA256 algorithm can be still used for making sure you acquired the same data as the original one. For example if you download something you can easily check if data has not changed due to network errors or malware injection. You can compare hashes of your file and original one which is usually provided in the website you are getting data or the file from.

SHA-256 is one of the successor hash functions to SHA-1,and is one of the strongest hash functions available.
 
Last edited:
And 2–3 years later, Liz is spinning this as his RAPE. Not a consent accident, but rape.

Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 2.51.50 AM.png


Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 2.52.36 AM.png

What if it was just a little consent accident, Liz?! :story:

---
edit:
The consent accident was November 3, 2019, in Zurich.

Here’s Liz arriving in Zurich on October 31st.
Screenshot 2022-11-14 at 3.09.35 AM.png

Also, he’s a furry. How did his consent accident victim know it was dog hair, and not like, fuzz from his fursuit or one of the snow leopard dolls he fucks or whatever?
 
Last edited:
I interrupt the conversation just to say that I find the way he writes extremely irritating.

Like, bitch, you are not an Oxbridge intellectual and you definitely don't talk like one. You talk like an entitled nerd in high school who sneers at the jocks instead of cowering but still gets beaten up, and has watched way too much british TV or read too much Neil Gaiman, thinking it will make him less retarded than his fellow americans.
 
This should probably go without saying, but still.

When (because I believe in you, autists) we find the victim, please do not contact them. Instead, it's likely there is an archive or conversation or whatever where they discuss the rape from their perspective. The victim should only come to speak up at the farms if they wish to, but don't be like Ben Collins journoscum and harass them to bring down Elliot.
 
Liz story about dog hair is retarded and this is why:

Contrary to popular belief, you can't really bring your dog with you on intercontinental trips. There is a process with medicals, documents and shit that has to be sorted out and then the animal will still have to spend time in quaranteen.

Am I to believe that Liz got dog hair on his clothes from his dog, inside his home, then travelled for 24 hours to the other side of the planet. Checked into his hotel room, had a shower and went to bed.
Then next day, after the conference, there was a dog hair incident? How fucking long does dog hair stick to your clothes?
Do you never fucking change clothes?
I can’t speak for whatever breed Fong Jones has, but it took a couple of washes and tumble drying to get my Dalmatian hair totally off my clothes after we rehoused him.
Cotton, and other vegetable fibers it is not too bad, but wool and synthetics it is like Velcro.

Maybe if someone was really sensitive as in actually highly allergic to dogs it could be an issue.


Of course, if I was heading to speak at a conference I would either have my suit cleaned properly or just buy some fresh clothes for the event.
 
Reposting this tweet again:
1668416486202.png


You can't press charges because it happened while being hypnotized. What kind of bullshit is this?
Is it this lame excuse that all of these hypno-kink creeps use to get away with it?

- Officer, yesterday I was brutally raped by 5 people.
- Were you hypnotized?
- Yes
- Sorry, in that case you can't press charges.
- Damn
- ...
 
Just a reminder that the dog hair consent accident is Elliot's version of the story, and Elliot is the accused. I'm sure the accuser didn't refer to the event as a consent accident, so the rest of the story is likely biased. We don't know the victim's version of the story, and if the truth is somewhere in the middle, the facts are likely worse than how they were presented from cinderblock face. It would be hard to believe that a pervert like Elliot has partners that are sensitive enough to go public with a story about dog hair rape but none of his other devious behaviors have warranted complaint. It's like a serial killer getting caught for not using a turn signal.
 
Yeah, that's why your theory falls flat.

That aside, there's no reason for anyone to believe the contrived dog hair garbage story. That sounds like something little Timmy will make up after being caught jerking it to the weather forecast lady. "I was trying to get the dog hair off my private part!"
If the dog hair thing is “real,” this might be another possible explanation. He was fingering/jerking off/whatever an unconscious person and when they realized he said “oh I was trying to get some dog hair that got inside your underwear.”
 
From Richard DeVaul's site: What I teach:
Consensual-Nonconsent. It's also known as rape-play
1668418811425.png

View attachment 3863796

I guess that's how consent accidents happen.

Elliot mentioned that he agreed with the person that he could come over and 'play'. If that's the case then this person is probably also
active in the (hypno) kink scene.
Also: If Elliot refers to a 'she' then there is a big chance it's actually a he.
 
Back