Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An old member before your time.Who did?
Trump reads like a mad retard here. Half expect him to go off on Youngkin is a bastard bloody bitch for not responding.
I expect both Youngkin and Desantis to continue ignoring his tantrums. If Trump runs again and the Republicans actually rally around a mainstream candidate this time instead of splitting the field like in 2016, this childish shit it going to help coast Trump to an easy loss. At this point I'm personally completely over entertaining his lashing out at everything that remotely challenges him, and I expect more people will be too.
Frankly, this situation destroys the notion that you need to debate to be seen as a serious candidate.
What was it? That independents hate a candidate who won't debate? I am pretty sure I've seen that argument advanced on this very website.
An old member before your time.
Cruz may be their best bet, he is actually extremely well versed in Constitutional law so probably can figure out the arcane arts of The SenateTed Cruz is basically someone who thinks he is equal to Mitch in cunning and ruthlessness, but in truth is a bumbling fool who's fallen upward career-wise and who vastly overestimates how smart he is and would be utterly exposed as such if he took over.
At the very least, it offers a layman’s explanation of money laundering. All that’s left is proof the money going into Ukraine was obtained illegally.No it isn't. There was no proof and a great deal of speculation.
Like I said at the time, the only known case of a pod person turning into a real human. He turned back again later, though.he isn't as rarded as he seems, which I was surprised to learn when looking into him in 2016.
The problem is, once you consider how much money the democrats were handing themselves in the actual bills, it stops making sense. Billions were allocated for Democrat favoured groups and causes. There were too many steps for a relatively paltry amount.At the very least, it offers a layman’s explanation of money laundering. All that’s left is proof the money going into Ukraine was obtained illegally.
The problem is, once you consider how much money the democrats were handing themselves in the actual bills, it stops making sense. Billions were allocated for Democrat favoured groups and causes. There were too many steps for a relatively paltry amount.
All the evidence that exists is an article saying "might" "maybe" "seems" and using all of the usual journoscum tactics to create the impression of connection where non exists. Journoscum don't suddenly become based just because they happen to agree with you.
Speaking of which, where did he go? I miss himSome people have a bad habit over here of following political "sages."
Remember HK-47? How he absconded pretty quickly after the 2020 election, all the Durham probe he was hyping out ended up coming to naught, etc?
People seem to be forgetting the fraud wasn't nearly as widespread this time around either and the GOP failed to fund many competitive candidates.You are right that a lot of funds came through the bills passed through the house and senate but those were quite easy to detect at the time and we were doing that. If Gehenna was roughly right about the cost for the original steal the Dems needed billions, not millions. Now FTX is short just shy of 10billion dollars and only 4 billion of that was "loaned" out to Almatec research. What I think a lot of us would like to know is where a) those funds originally came from and b) where did that money go? No one is too fussed about the 40million SBF personally donated we (well me at least) are thinking this was the Zuckerbucks 2.0 which I recall was 400million from the man himself alone.
Edit: This is a decent explanation worth at least some time exploring and yes it is perfectly possible that Zelensky was using FTX as a medium for kickbacks in exchange for support regardless of the morality of the Ukraine/Russia conflict.
I wouldn't be so sure. With the way the elections are going, I'm convinced a deal was struck for Republicans to take the House and for Democrats to keep the Senate. McCarthy wanted his just dues because he is a good uniparty shill and won't accept having the House stolen from his clutches. So, the reason the Republicans are taking the House currently is probably because McCarthy more than anything else.With
With the results today, 221 is the probable pickup in the House. It is going to make McCarthy's life hell trying to become Speaker, he will need to bend over for some Democrats, but he is all for that.
Largely this.People seem to be forgetting the fraud wasn't nearly as widespread this time around either and the GOP failed to fund many competitive candidates.
Who was president in 2006 again? Oh, right...It’s honestly just a bad cope. Democrats took over Congress in 2006 and when the Great Recession hit in 2008, the Republicans were on the hook for it. This whole “this loss is ackchually a win!” is a pathetic sight to behold. It’s actually worse because everyone knows things are coming off the rails and the lack of a Republican sweep means the overall confidence level in their leadership is low, which means when it does actually happen, people aren’t going to turn to Republicans.
I haven't gotten to say it yet, but, I told you so. I've been saying since the 2020 election that it didn't take nor was a massive conspiracy. Stand Alone Complexes (not the anime) exist. The concept of a serendipitous conspiracy, and the concept of individual cells acting in concert without knowledge of each other's existence exists. There's no logical reason to assume that money is ever the issue with something like voter fraud when there's plenty of assholes who'd do it for free to be on "the right side of history".Some people have a bad habit over here of following political "sages."
Remember HK-47? How he absconded pretty quickly after the 2020 election, all the Durham probe he was hyping out ended up coming to naught, etc?
Crenshaw is a Senator? I thought he was a House Rep?I mentioned this a couple of pages back, but in general the GOP has NO ONE who can really replace Mitch and provide the same level of Machievillian genius and ruthlessness Cocaine Mitch displays on a regular basis.
Rand is an unofficial outcast among the GOP elite and has no real power or pull and be an empty suit leader, who no one would respect and have zero power to enforce his will and keep the rest of the GOP Senators in line.
Ted Cruz is basically someone who thinks he is equal to Mitch in cunning and ruthlessness, but in truth is a bumbling fool who's fallen upward career-wise and who vastly overestimates how smart he is and would be utterly exposed as such if he took over.
Lindsay Graham is a quisling who has no spine and would be a bigger fuck up than Cruz, as he would be a cuckservative supreme if given a chance.
Finally, Dan Crenshaw is an even bigger quisling cuckservative, made worse by the fact that he's still a relative rookie Senator (meaning he has very little power or influence) and worse, has an ego where he's been told that he's the second coming of John McCain.
He's a House Rep, though wouldn't be surprising if the little Quisling tried to angle for a higher office in the near future.Wait,
Crenshaw is a Senator? I thought he was a House Rep?