Georgia x2, South Osetia x2, Abkazia x2, Transnitria, North Osetia, Alania, Tajikistan, Chechnya x2, Dagestan, North Caucasus, Ukraine x2, Syria. Russians were involved in wars in those regions in last 30 years. Not even US on their level. People from those regions run to EU too. Stop being such fuckwit. I'm not a big fan of US too but Russia isn't acting any better, they are meddling in EU too and trying to destabilize it as best as they can.
It's as if something radical happened in the 1990s. For example, the collapse of something could lead to separatism and war. Well, let's analyze everything separately. Abkhazia and Ossetia were part of one conflict with Georgia in 1992; Russia was not involved, Georgia lost, and the two republics became independent but not recognized. In 2008, Saakashvili, after the overthrow of the government (the Rose Revolution) and under the patronage of Bush, is breaking up a new war that Russia is entering; this time, Georgia is losing again, and now Russia recognizes the republics. Transnistria had a conflict with Moldova in 1992; Russia did not intervene militarily, but threatened Moldova, which ended the conflict with a shaky compromise.
Chechnya, which is part of Russia, won the first Chechen war and became independent, then attacked Dagestan, which is also part of Russia, thereby unleashing the second Chechen war. It's funny to read about Tajikistan, the Caucasus, and Chechnya at all; you know that Russia fought against Al Qaeda, the Caucasian Emirate of Isis, and the Mujahideen and was literally supported by everyone, right? You didn't just throw in an ignorant statement that goes against your own position. Russia is also fighting against the same "moderate rebels" in Syria, at the request of the Syrian government.
The outbreak of war in the Donbass appeared due to the next overthrow of the government (do you notice a pattern here?) in which the east of Urkaina did not recognize the new government and was moderately supported by Russia.
Summing up, half of these conflicts were created by the United States, and the other half were fought with fanatics starting wars everywhere who are ready to chop off your head and shout "Allahu Akbar." What a stable world it would be without interference from Russia.
So is the US administration that did Vietnam, same with Iraq and Afghanistan, yet you lot never miss a chance to bring them up.
Modern Russia doesn't get to brush off its history, especially since they insist on digging up skeletons to shove in the faces of their opponents. It's a fair game as far as I'm concerned.
People in charge of Russia today were around in Soviet times just the same.
Try again.
You're really retarded. At what point did the United States collapse and the Washington Federation was created?