Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Sometimes I feel like the Overton Window or whatever is somehow widening in both directions. Mainstream jouranlists are starting to begrdudgingly admit that puberty-blockers and shit might not be harmless, but at the same time, we've gone from platforming airbrushed figures like Jazz Jennings or Catylyn Jenner to blatantly inhuman ghouls like Tony and Dylan what's his face.
 
Also his profile is hilariously male.
I stitched together a comparison of the profile photos we have. Note that, apart from the screen capture from The Hill segment, all the other photos are of Tony's right side and have been mirrored.
tony-profile-comparisons.jpg

Sources for older pictures:
Documentary clips of Erin:
@garbage cake covered his surgery results a while back, though by that point he had removed a side-on comparison picture that was in his original post (Unddit, archive). Didn't delete it from imgur though (archive).
 
It seems that this year's Transgender Remembrance Week of Visibly Coming Out (is that right?) has been the equivalent of a full moon to Tony.

Just when I thought I had the time to go through his mental thread at the start of the week (in response to the New York Times being genocidally transphobic for fascisticly (((asking questions))) about puberty blockers), he comes out with another banger. (twitter.com, archive.ph)

This time it's about a Reuters story looking into why it might be that girls now account for the majority of transgender-identifying children (reuters.com, archive.ph). It was so mental that it actually broke my little auto-screenshot-taking server :(. But that's fixed now so here you go, all 20,410 pixels tall of it:

… it won't embed. XenForo is so transphobic.

Here you are, lovingly broken apart with my own two hands:
1.png2.png3.png4.png5.png6.png

Edit: Perhaps worth separately including Tony revealing some of the people on his block list. He uses a giant block list but still it's interesting to see who Reuters journalist Robin Respaut follows that Tony has blocked:
Fh2t2nBWAAEPEs4.jpgFh2sxY6XwAERvT-.jpgFh2s7GKXwAIQEvC.jpgFh2tkImXkAMLOns.jpg

He did this on November 14 with New York Times reporter Christina Jewett:
FhiFf9LWIAABaRW.pngFhiFkMvWIAQRGMX.pngFhiEy7_WAAMNLd2.pngFhiFCNiWAAASFW_.pngFhiFECYXkAAk84y.pngFhiFHW7WAAIC9W2.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Happy end of Trans Visibility Week 2022! I’m sure you’re all relieved that the troons will go back to being invisible for another 51 weeks.

First up, an apology, as I realise now that Tony had been referring to his “girlfriend” in otherwise boring tweets that I didn’t pick up on at the start of the week. Tony is living the female-college-student-hood he never got by listening to, er, tranny punk recommended by one of his boyfriends (archive).

We’ll gloss over Tony discovering that women are individuals and each have their own political opinions (archive) and go straight into his NYT puberty blockers thread.

On Monday November 14 the New York Times published a feature by Megan Twohey and Christina Jewett titled “They Paused Puberty, but Is There a Cost?” (archive, avoids the paywall).

Now, I won’t really be “assessing” the article directly, only through Tony’s enraged tweets about it. But I did want to pause here and note that if you were dead set on publishing an anti-puberty blockers story you would not allow this standfirst/kicker:
Puberty blockers can ease transgender youths’ anguish and buy time to weigh options. But concerns are growing about long-term physical effects and other consequences.

Because, as we have discussed ad nauseam ad infinitum, there is little evidence that puberty blockers (GnRH agonists) “ease … anguish”. The claim that they “buy time to weigh options” is also hotly contested and gets right to the heart of the question of “why block puberty?” This was an important point of the High Court of England and Wales’s ruling in Bell v Tavistock:
there is a lack of clarity over the purpose of the treatment [puberty blockers]: in particular, whether it provides a “pause to think” in a “hormone neutral” state or is a treatment to limit the effects of puberty, and thus the need for greater surgical and chemical interventions later …

Tony appears to be in the latter camp (archive), where puberty blockers are taken for aesthetic reasons:
And every year that I desisted was another set of procedures, surgeries, and therapy visits that were added to a box that one day the time would come due to open.

More generally, I’d say that the article does an OK job but from my perspective there’s a lot of unjustified accommodation of people’s feelings rather than the (lack of) evidence, and some things are misrepresented to a greater or lesser extent (what the “Dutch protocol” actually is, what Bell v Tavistock actually was).

Here’s a portion from the NYT story that will be very relevant, however:
Republican governors and lawmakers in more than a dozen states are working to limit or even criminalize the treatments … Meanwhile, the Biden administration describes transgender medicine as a civil right. And some advocates criticize anyone who questions the treatments’ safety.

Anyway we’re here for Tony! It’s his time to shine! Prove wrong their claims about TRAs lashing out at anyone who asks questions about puberty blockers’ safety! Here’s his thread on the NYT story (archive).

nyt-tony-01.png

Er, leaving aside that the BBC employed trans propagandist Ben Hunte as its LGBT reporter for several years, this tweet is doing a lot of work.

When Tony says “not endorsed by any major medical organization” he is presumably referring to WPATH which, even leaving aside its advocacy for those who are sexually aroused by castration (archive), is a thoroughly unserious organisation dominated by trans activists. Listen to the discussion of WPATH’s most recent self-identifying “Standards of Care” on episode 94 of the Gender: A Wider Lens podcast for a run down of the insanity.

He may also be referring to the Endocrine Society or the American Academy of Pediatrics, both of which are thoroughly captured. For information on the Endocrine Society’s capture see this letter from Malone et al (archive) and Malone’s interview on the Gender: A Wider Lens podcast. For the American Academy of Pediatrics, see this article by Julia Mason and Leor Sapir (archive), this detailed one by James Cantor (also attached below as it’s not open-access), or this Gender: A Wider Lens interview with Leor Sapir.

An important point that Sapir makes in that interview is that other, more general, medical bodies will typically defer to more specialised ones. So, for instance, you have the American Medical Association deferring to the compromised American Academy of Pediatrics.

Tony’s position is also a curious one to take given that the national health services of Sweden, Finland and England (health is devolved to the UK nations) have effectively ceased using puberty blockers in a widespread manner. Are these not major medical organisations? The NHS is the world’s fifth-largest employer, after all.

And, as for Tony’s claim that the reporters “fear-monger”, well, read the damn article. It’s the kind of anodyne prose you’d expect from the NYT.

Phew, one tweet down, just … 18 to go 😬.

nyt-tony-02.png

“Out of context readings of studies rather than the best review of the literature”. Aha! An easy one! Thank god. I thought I’d be writing this all weekend.

The best reviews, in English, of the literature are the ones done by NICE - one each of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. (Presumably Tony’s illogically excluding the Florida one because for some reason believes it was written by a dentist rather than two Canadian specialists in medical evidence synthesis.) They found, in short, that the evidence for any hoped-for outcome was very weak. If Tony has other systematic reviews of puberty blockers (or CSH) I would like to see them (as would all the doctors in the field!).

nyt-tony-03.png

Tony takes issue with the fact the New York Times commissioned an analysis on the effects of puberty blockers on bone density. I am entirely unsurprised that the NYT did this, because the existing evidence on GnRHa and bone mineral density is very poor. Here’s what NICE had to say about it (my emphasis):
The results of the studies that reported bone density outcomes suggest that GnRH analogues may reduce the expected increase in bone density (which is expected during puberty). However, as the studies themselves are not reliable, the results could be due to confounding, bias or chance. While controlled trials may not be possible, comparative studies are needed to understand this association and whether the effects of GnRH analogues on bone density are seen after they are stopped. All the studies that reported safety outcomes provided very low certainty evidence.

Again, the important point here is not “puberty blockers do x to bone density” but rather that the studies we have on this subject are so poor that we can’t say with any real degree of certainty.

The next few tweets are just Tony screeching that one of the two NYT reporters follows people on Twitter who urge caution on pediatric transition. He also complains that news organisations won’t let a transgender person report on this subject – but one of the people included in Tony’s screenshots, and marked as anti-trans by his Shinigami Eyes extension, is psychologist Erica Anderson, a trans-identified male.

Almost there folks, you’re nearly free of my autism for the moment.

nyt-tony-04-step-back.png

These literature reviews supporting the safety of puberty blockers that Tony talks about are still elusive, much like all the “cis lesbians” he would have us think he was having lots of hot sex with before he nailed himself to the T4T mast.

And he keeps banging on about peer review, but lots of shit gets past peer review. The whole “Grievance Studies” hoax involved peer reviewed journals. And in medicine the notorious and “utterly false” Andrew Wakefield paper linking the MMR vaccine, widely used in the UK, with autism passed peer review at The Lancet (archive) – perhaps the most prestigious medical journal in the world. I mean, here’s a 15-year-old article in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine laying out the problems with peer review (archive).

nyt-tony-06-clarify.png

Let’s take Tony’s claim here at face value. That means that, seemingly, for all of human history until the past 10 years there has been a cohort of society who were traumatised, suicidal trans-identifying people. And yet they escaped notice. All I have to say is that “growing out” of transgender identification (archive) makes a lot of sense if you consider that puberty is a time of sexual maturation, and (previously) those who identified as the opposite sex would grow up to be same-sex attracted.

nyt-tony-05-catastrophize.png

Yes well I’m glad that Kate Strangio is here to hypothesise on the other side. It boggles my mind that I’m typing this, but we don’t have studies because (a) the resistance of gender medics to conducting rigorous studies and overwhelmingly (b) because treating children with puberty blockers for many years is a new phenomenon. And I don’t just mean new as in “new for trans-identifying children”, I mean just plain new. GnRH was discovered in 1971, and GnRH agonists mostly launched in the 1980s and 1990s.

The first children taking puberty blockers were those (mostly girls) diagnosed with precocious (early-onset) puberty. How seriously is their health being taken? Not very! In fact, Christina Jewett, co-author of this New York Times article, seems to be one of the few people treating these drugs with the seriousness they merit. She wrote an article 5 years ago for Kaiser Health News about Lupron (archive). It leads with the story of Sharissa Derricott, who is one year older than Tony, was given Lupron for precocious puberty, and has had to have her jaw replaced because of it.

nyt-tony-08-take-a-pill.png

This isn’t hypothetical, though. We know that blockers prevent the expected large increase in bone mineral density children experience in puberty. Does this increase occur when blockers are withdrawn? We don’t know. Why? Because the gender docs haven’t done the studies. I’ve seen some studies that discuss “add-back” protocols for adults who lose bone density when taking GnRH agonists (for prostate cancer, for instance) but to be clear these are adults who have developed normal bone density in the first place.

Plus “just take a pill” has the same energy as “cut your tits off? just get implants!”.

nyt-tony-11-detransitioner.png

Really hates those detransitioners! God forbid these “trans women” were able to develop normally while this bitch was living the high life of experimental puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones.

nyt-tony-12-even-if-pbs-are-bad.png

Another cynical suicide claim. First of all, the study he references (archive) is about cross-sex hormones (“gender affirming hormone therapy”, or GAHT) and the authors explicitly distinguish between cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers. So its conclusions can’t be applied to a different category of drugs and this is made clear in the study.

Second, the study is cross-sectional, as in “Alice has chocolate and is not suicidal; Bob does not have chocolate and is suicidal”. You can’t draw the kind of conclusion Tony does here from this kind of study. And in any case the evidence for puberty blockers’ effect on depression (and by proxy suicidality) is assessed in the NICE review, and the evidence is of “very low certainty”. See my suicide post for details.

nyt-tony-07-dead-kids.png

nyt-tony-10-tordoff.png

This was certainly what was claimed in the Tordoff et al publicity, but unfortunately is not what their study actually found (archive).

nyt-tony-09-do-better.png

Ah, yes, “do better”. “Do better at conforming to my irrational beliefs.”

nyt-tony-13-turban-thread.png

Ballsy for Tony to say this about Turban’s thread (archive). Tony’s claim is that the NYT article is wrong, but Turban is saying “so what we knew all this” (a classic trans activist gambit when faced with bad news). So which is it?

(I won’t do Turban tweet-by-tweet but in short, he completely misrepresents what is meant by puberty “clarifying” gender feelings, makes an unevidenced claim about bone density increasing, misrepresents the situation in Europe with gender clinics, and whitewashes off-label prescribing.)

Lastly, for completeness sack, here's Tony's TikTok video about the article in which he has smeared the camera lens with vaseline.


And a little present for those who made it this far:
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Sometimes I feel like the Overton Window or whatever is somehow widening in both directions. Mainstream jouranlists are starting to begrdudgingly admit that puberty-blockers and shit might not be harmless, but at the same time, we've gone from platforming airbrushed figures like Jazz Jennings or Catylyn Jenner to blatantly inhuman ghouls like Tony and Dylan what's his face.

Could be that they're doing that to put the most horrific of troon ghouls front-and-center to peak even more people...
 
"I fucking love science" types constantly fellate the concept of peer-review as if it isn't often just a rubber-stamp process. As @Geranium said, shitty and fraudulent articles get through peer review all the time, and a huge percentage of peer-reviewed studies cannot reproduce their results.

You would think Tony would know better, given his academic background, but I suppose he knows who his audience is, and he is willing to mislead them as long as it leads to more kids getting castrated.
 
Some more minor madness before I call it a night.

“I’m Erin Reed and I endorse this message”; bad-person-likes-you-so-you-are-bad edition:
View attachment 3867240

“I’m Erin Reed and I endorse this message”: “I took thalidomide while pregnant and my kid has extra limbs. Checkmate, bigots” edition.
View attachment 3867255

And just Tony complaining of having tender fee fees after spending all day behaving like a lobotomised and PCP-addicted hyena-baboon hybrid on Twitter, a platform he could take or leave no big deal, absolutely not still pissed off at missing the verification validation train, honest:
View attachment 3867249
Ok, I’ll try. Tony, you looked very fetching in your goblin costume you wore to the renaissance fayre.
This ghouls bragging that there was an increase, any increase in bone density in 2.5 years grinds my gears. Puberty is when the greatest increase in bone growth happens in someone's life and people are patting this mom on the back because... It increased slightly during that time. Let's shut down your body's hormones, just drink some milk abd get sunshine and you'll be right as rain.

Also, the NIH has some splainin to do : ( emphasis mine)
Screenshot_20221118-191145_Trebuchet.png

Factors affecting peak bone mass​


Peak bone mass is influenced by a variety of factors: some that you can't change, like gender and race, and some that you can, like nutrition and physical activity.
 
When he changed his Twitter bio in July he took out any mention that he was a “mom”. He inserted “mother” a month later, presumably after he saw us calling him out.


The three mentions of his son on Twitter since May have all been about how Tony is teaching him the Correct Politics:
View attachment 3880011View attachment 3880014View attachment 3880020

I wonder if Tony’s two new boyfriends will also get to be called “mom”.

Edit:

I guess we never did find out if Tony bought his son that dress in the end like he was planning in summer 2019.
Tony, your son is telling you to turn off the lights because you told him he, and all other humans would die untimley deaths if we used too much electricity.
 
lol at Tony blocking Jesse Singal when that's the one person who might willingly take Tony seriously ever, he knows Singal actually reading the studies Tony claims support his delusional cult beliefs is an existential threat just like that perjurer Jack Turban does.

He's also currently malding about billionaires selling Twitter to another billionaire so he wants to launch a murderous purge of class enemies who don't placate the cult:
1668834717283.png1668834725772.png1668834653813.png1668834835858.png1668834603284.png

Tony also finally got around to saying what he actually meant the other day and demands more cult propaganda rather than actual journalism:
1668834691489.png
 
Tony also finally got around to saying what he actually meant the other day and demands more cult propaganda rather than actual journalism:
View attachment 3891696
Yes!! Please NYT, please write an article about “fleeing families”. I’d love to hear a white middle aged handmaiden mom justify quitting her job, packing up her life and moving her other kids from their friends just so her teenaged daughter can grow a beard and chop her boobs off in a bluer state.
That is great optics for your cause Tony.
 
Last edited:
Tony's vendetta against this Chloe Cole person is starting to get weird. It reminds me of being a teenager in bars being screamed at by a 35 year old man because you declined his offer to pay for your drink.
Why would a proud feminist mom who loves women remind you of some gross dude at a bar???
 
3 years after quite the pricey surgery, and Bony Tony's nose has already returned to full mast, with the chin rapidly closing in... what a colossal waste of money. Worse for him is that aging will likely be thrice as bitter to him now, since his facial features will inevitably mature and masculinize further down their disportionate and unnatural paths. Whether if he decides to detransition or not, this is going to be a truly uncanny and peculiar looking eunich in a decade.
 
Tony, why can't you just be an extreme body mod enthusiast? Why do you need kids involved? You've already had your dick flayed, they can't "detrans" you?

"Trans youth" are their ticket to laundering autogynephilia. Kids are pure and non-sexual, so if "trans kids" exist, it means adult heterosexual males must be transitioning for reasons other than fetishism. They are not crossdressers that steal their wives' clothing, they're just "trans kids" who have grown up!

Yes!! Please NYT, please write an article about “fleeing families”. I’d love to hear a white middle aged handmaiden mom justify quitting her job, packing up her life and moving her other kids from their friends just so her teenaged daughter can grow a beard and chop her boobs off in a bluer state.
That is great optics for your cause Tony.

Child abuser Kimberly Shappley, who beat and punished her son for playing with "girl's toys" until she decided he was trans, actually drops into the comments to prove Erin wrong:

1.png

But Erin cannot conceive that other people might have been presented with both sides and then decided against his side. Erin does not possess the theory of mind to grasp this. In Erin's view, only he and a few select elites have the cognitive capacity to rationally choose a side on an issue.

The general public, in contrast, must simply be presented with n pro-trans articles and 0 "anti-trans" articles by the media, and then the crude ratchet in their brains will click over to the correct opinion, and that's that.

So any anti-trans sentiment, or any public pushback, is simply evidence that the rubes have been presented with >0 "anti-trans" news pieces, and this can be fixed by sufficient production of pro-trans news pieces by people who have real brains.
 
"Trans youth" are their ticket to laundering autogynephilia. Kids are pure and non-sexual, so if "trans kids" exist, it means adult heterosexual males must be transitioning for reasons other than fetishism. They are not crossdressers that steal their wives' clothing, they're just "trans kids" who have grown up!
This, 1000%

Trans kids narratives + personal lifestory retconnery is the propaganda strategy autogynephiles like Erin have settled on. Actually “propaganda” implies more consciousness than most of them have — they’re trying as hard to persuade themselves as the rest of us that it isn’t a fetish.
 
Tbh , haven’t saw that much on Twitter about it ? Obviously Sunday will be a big day for them , what with the couple of hundred prostitutes killed in South America to remember
Wtf it's a whole week now? Between this and pride month, eventually every trans day will expand to cover 365 days of the year every year. Trans Visibility Eternity.
 
Back