Waukesha, WI, Parade Vehicle Attack - Suspect is Darrell Edward Brooks, currently in custody.

Who's responsible?

  • Glowies

    Votes: 196 9.4%
  • Incel

    Votes: 57 2.7%
  • Truck of Peace

    Votes: 222 10.6%
  • BLM

    Votes: 708 34.0%
  • Retaliation for Kyle's Acquittal

    Votes: 539 25.9%
  • Minceraft

    Votes: 128 6.1%
  • Alt-Right Nazi Gamergater Chud

    Votes: 108 5.2%
  • Other (please specify)

    Votes: 127 6.1%

  • Total voters
    2,085
Life in prison is way more based than the dealth penalty. Once the death penalty has been carried out, that's it. They don't exist anymore and can't suffer for the damage they've caused. Kept alive -- either in PC where he'll be driven insane by the isolation or in genpop where he'll have to worry about getting raped or beaten every second of every day for being a pedo and a child killer (and if he survives that, he'll be thrown into an extended PC stay were he'll be driven insane; wash, rinse, repeat) -- and combined with the restitution order and prison work paying a few cents an hour into a commissary account subject to the restitution order meaning he won't ever be able to afford so much as a packet of ramen noodles without having to suck dick or give up his asshole for it and will have to eat the genpop slop or PC nutriloaf, etc. etc. is a way better punishment specifically because it's crueler and more painful.

Our reptile brains may tell us that death is the "harsher" and thus more fitting punishment, but it's really not. Once he's humanely euthanized, his punishment ends and thus his suffering ends while his victims still suffer.

In an ideal future, we'll not just do away with the death penalty, we'll figure out a way to keep someone's consciousness intact after the death of their physical body so that it can continue to suffer the full sentence they were given. What's more fitting? This guy gets a tiny, painless needle prick in his arm and humanely given a sedative to render him unconscious before drugs to arrest his breathing and stop his heart are administered and he basically just falls asleep and never wakes up, or this prick gets beaten, shanked and ass-raped for the next half-century, after which his consciousness is uploaded into a mainframe and still suffering and being driven insane hundreds of years from now when humans have colonized Alpha Centauri or whatever?
 
And not these expensive ones like lethal injection. The Br*tish empire already figured out the algorithms for the right rope length to snap someones neck. Why not use them.
Or why not bring back lingchi just for people like this one? I'm all for human rights and things like that, but somehow I don't think human rights should apply to people like this one.
 
Or why not bring back lingchi just for people like this one? I'm all for human rights and things like that, but somehow I don't think human rights should apply to people like this one.
I mean, it's right there in the name: Human rights.

This isn't some edgy 'niggers aren't human' bullshit, but when you did what he did, and act like he does, you effectively throw away your humanity. You are sub-human garbage.
 
Life in prison is way more based than the dealth penalty. Once the death penalty has been carried out, that's it. They don't exist anymore and can't suffer for the damage they've caused. Kept alive -- either in PC where he'll be driven insane by the isolation or in genpop where he'll have to worry about getting raped or beaten every second of every day for being a pedo and a child killer (and if he survives that, he'll be thrown into an extended PC stay were he'll be driven insane; wash, rinse, repeat) -- and combined with the restitution order and prison work paying a few cents an hour into a commissary account subject to the restitution order meaning he won't ever be able to afford so much as a packet of ramen noodles without having to suck dick or give up his asshole for it and will have to eat the genpop slop or PC nutriloaf, etc. etc. is a way better punishment specifically because it's crueler and more painful.

Our reptile brains may tell us that death is the "harsher" and thus more fitting punishment, but it's really not. Once he's humanely euthanized, his punishment ends and thus his suffering ends while his victims still suffer.

In an ideal future, we'll not just do away with the death penalty, we'll figure out a way to keep someone's consciousness intact after the death of their physical body so that it can continue to suffer the full sentence they were given. What's more fitting? This guy gets a tiny, painless needle prick in his arm and humanely given a sedative to render him unconscious before drugs to arrest his breathing and stop his heart are administered and he basically just falls asleep and never wakes up, or this prick gets beaten, shanked and ass-raped for the next half-century, after which his consciousness is uploaded into a mainframe and still suffering and being driven insane hundreds of years from now when humans have colonized Alpha Centauri or whatever?
A bit on the sci-fi end with the consciousness upload, but I agree with everything else. I still don't understand why people advocate for the death penalty. Taxes are spent on keeping them alive, but one has to ask how much is spent on keeping them alive dirt cheap? I suspect a handful for each citizen, but I'm all for paying a monthly tax to keep these animals to suffer as long as possible before their last breath, or rather cough, of life.

Because if you think about it, a lot of people LOVE the idea, in the case of suicide, of going out murdering one or two before calling quits. If they're sentenced to death, they've just taken part of the deal they've signed their name on with a bloody ink feather, fully aware of it. In developing worlds, resources are scarce to maintain life imprisonment for simple suffering, so infliction of death to lower maintaining the dredges of society to make room is prefered. There are hundreds of causes in taxes that I understand aren't worth paying for, but in a developing world, a death sentence is akin to merciful relief.
 
Last edited:

Still the best victim statement as this guy called out the Milwakee DA, John Chismholm, for being a piece of shit
(Tweet ,archive)
Screenshot_20221119-022421_Brave.jpg
 
In an ideal future, we'll not just do away with the death penalty, we'll figure out a way to keep someone's consciousness intact after the death of their physical body so that it can continue to suffer the full sentence they were given.
That's one of the main plot elements of Black Mirror S4.E6 "Black Museum":
 
Life in prison is way more based than the dealth penalty. Once the death penalty has been carried out, that's it. They don't exist anymore and can't suffer for the damage they've caused. Kept alive -- either in PC where he'll be driven insane by the isolation or in genpop where he'll have to worry about getting raped or beaten every second of every day for being a pedo and a child killer (and if he survives that, he'll be thrown into an extended PC stay were he'll be driven insane; wash, rinse, repeat) -- and combined with the restitution order and prison work paying a few cents an hour into a commissary account subject to the restitution order meaning he won't ever be able to afford so much as a packet of ramen noodles without having to suck dick or give up his asshole for it and will have to eat the genpop slop or PC nutriloaf, etc. etc. is a way better punishment specifically because it's crueler and more painful.

Our reptile brains may tell us that death is the "harsher" and thus more fitting punishment, but it's really not. Once he's humanely euthanized, his punishment ends and thus his suffering ends while his victims still suffer.

In an ideal future, we'll not just do away with the death penalty, we'll figure out a way to keep someone's consciousness intact after the death of their physical body so that it can continue to suffer the full sentence they were given. What's more fitting? This guy gets a tiny, painless needle prick in his arm and humanely given a sedative to render him unconscious before drugs to arrest his breathing and stop his heart are administered and he basically just falls asleep and never wakes up, or this prick gets beaten, shanked and ass-raped for the next half-century, after which his consciousness is uploaded into a mainframe and still suffering and being driven insane hundreds of years from now when humans have colonized Alpha Centauri or whatever?
Id rather him just be dead. People want to bitch about the world being overpopulated yet they dont just put down people like this that dont matter or ever will. The world would be a better place if they just hung him and threw him in the trash than paid for his upkeep to get tortured in the dungeon for the next 10,000 years. They expecting Jesus to come back and absolve him of his crimes or something? I dont get it.
 
A bit on the sci-fi end with the consciousness upload, but I agree with everything else. I still don't understand why people advocate for the death penalty. Taxes are spent on keeping them alive, but one has to ask how much is spent on keeping them alive dirt cheap? I suspect a handful for each citizen, but I'm all for paying a monthly tax to keep these animals to suffer as long as possible before their last breath, or rather cough, of life.

Because if you think about it, a lot of people LOVE the idea, in the case of suicide, of going out murdering one or two before calling quits. If they're sentenced to death, they've just taken part of the deal they've signed their name on with a bloody ink feather, fully aware of it. In developing worlds, resources are scarce to maintain life imprisonment for simple suffering, so infliction of death to lower maintaining the dredges of society to make room is prefered. There are hundreds of causes in taxes that I understand aren't worth paying for, but in a developing world, a death sentence is akin to merciful relief.
It costs me as a taxpayer in my state around $57,000 a year to house an inmate, on average. That's over twice what I make in a year spent on keeping them alive. It cost the Russian taxpayer precisely 486.08₽ ($0.31, the cost of a 9x18mm FMJ bullet) in 1994 to put Andrei Chikatilo (one of the worst serial killers to ever live) down with a single gunshot to his head.

People who say the "death penalty is so expensive!" or "life imprisonment is much better!" don't understand how fucking expensive it is allow them to appeal their case 9 times on the flimsiest of grounds or to actually house them for a year.

And for what? Prison in the USA is cushy compared to other nations' prisons. Sure, it isn't pleasant, but a life sentence in an American prison isn't hell on earth like some of you dumbasses think it is. And for around $57,000 a year, for a minimum of 20 years (which is what a "life sentence" is), totaling $1,140,000, you can pretend that life imprisonment is totally a worse punishment than simply putting a bullet in them.

Or you can simply shoot them and put that money to better use while making sure there's one less scumbag in the world.
 
As I always try to remind people when KF gets super bloodthirsty about some criminal getting lengthy prison sentences instead of eating lead:

When you make the death penalty legal, you are assuming the government is going to have the same standards for what kind of circumstances justify using it that you do. That is a dangerously naïve assumption. It will get turned around on you when they continue to let men like Brooks off "easy", but throw the book at anyone whose crime better suits left-wing media narratives.
 
As I always try to remind people when KF gets super bloodthirsty about some criminal getting lengthy prison sentences instead of eating lead:

When you make the death penalty legal, you are assuming the government is going to have the same standards for what kind of circumstances justify using it that you do. That is a dangerously naïve assumption. It will get turned around on you when they continue to let men like Brooks off "easy", but throw the book at anyone whose crime better suits left-wing media narratives.
Here's an easy compromise. When the culprit is guilty beyond reasonable doubt like Brooks is, let the victims decide if he lives or dies.

Personally, Brooks deserves the same ending as the antagonist in Lady Vengeance got where all the victims families pulled straws, got to beat the piss out of him and the final griever got to deliver the final blow.
In that film, the final person was the grandmother of one of the kids and she stabbed the scumbag in the skull with her grandson's school scissors.
 
Life in prison is a good start, but personally I believe that for real justice to be served that on the anniversary of the parade attack that everyone of the surviving victims, their family members, and the family members of those he killed should each get to spend five minutes with Brooks in a locked room, Brooks hands chained up to the ceiling, a baseball bat, and no guards or cameras. Whatever happens, happens. Then things might be a bit more fair.
 
Now what remains to be seen is how much more plastic surgery Dorow's in for now that she's getting her 15 minutes in.
 
Life in prison is way more based than the dealth penalty. Once the death penalty has been carried out, that's it. They don't exist anymore and can't suffer for the damage they've caused. Kept alive -- either in PC where he'll be driven insane by the isolation or in genpop where he'll have to worry about getting raped or beaten every second of every day for being a pedo and a child killer (and if he survives that, he'll be thrown into an extended PC stay were he'll be driven insane; wash, rinse, repeat) -- and combined with the restitution order and prison work paying a few cents an hour into a commissary account subject to the restitution order meaning he won't ever be able to afford so much as a packet of ramen noodles without having to suck dick or give up his asshole for it and will have to eat the genpop slop or PC nutriloaf, etc. etc. is a way better punishment specifically because it's crueler and more painful.

Our reptile brains may tell us that death is the "harsher" and thus more fitting punishment, but it's really not. Once he's humanely euthanized, his punishment ends and thus his suffering ends while his victims still suffer.

In an ideal future, we'll not just do away with the death penalty, we'll figure out a way to keep someone's consciousness intact after the death of their physical body so that it can continue to suffer the full sentence they were given. What's more fitting? This guy gets a tiny, painless needle prick in his arm and humanely given a sedative to render him unconscious before drugs to arrest his breathing and stop his heart are administered and he basically just falls asleep and never wakes up, or this prick gets beaten, shanked and ass-raped for the next half-century, after which his consciousness is uploaded into a mainframe and still suffering and being driven insane hundreds of years from now when humans have colonized Alpha Centauri or whatever?
You've pretty much solidified my support for the death penalty with this post.
 
As I always try to remind people when KF gets super bloodthirsty about some criminal getting lengthy prison sentences instead of eating lead:

When you make the death penalty legal, you are assuming the government is going to have the same standards for what kind of circumstances justify using it that you do. That is a dangerously naïve assumption. It will get turned around on you when they continue to let men like Brooks off "easy", but throw the book at anyone whose crime better suits left-wing media narratives.
Iran is currently lining up 14000 people on death row for simply protesting. Its proving your point to a T that its better to house a criminal then to justify a bullet to the head.
 
Iran is currently lining up 14000 people on death row for simply protesting. Its proving your point to a T that its better to house a criminal then to justify a bullet to the head.
The guy ran over like 16 or 17 people. That’s a bit more heinous than protesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phantom
Back