Star Wars Griefing Thread (SPOILERS) - Safety off

You write a shitty central narrative story, and you have now poisoned the well and killed all the side stories.
This is a very good point. The fanboys can praise the D+ shows as much as they want, but if a fan felt burned by how shitty the sequels were for ruining the legacy characters plus how bad the other shows were, why would they be convinced to watch this new show? How long will Disney ignore the sequels and pretend they didn't happen? They've fucked themselves into only making content in the OT era, which has been thoroughly explored in the past so much that there's very little left to learn about it.

No matter how much the fans jerk it to the "masterpiece kino" that is Andor, in the same canon Luke, Han, Leia and Leia will always end up as failures and Rey Palpatine is still the last Jedi ever.
Basically, the whole MCU built itself up to fight Thanos as a final boss, and with him gone, there's nothing left.
In the comics Thanos is nowhere near the final boss of anything, but if they want to build up an event on that scale ever again, they'd have to spend another decade doing it. There are the likes of Doom, Galactus, Kang, the Skrulls, etc in the comics. Normies don't understand how all of the stuff the MCU spent fucking up adapting took decades to build up in the comics, not ten years. Movies aren't comic books, I get that.
People may hate the M-She-U now but they're gonna be hyping themselves up (unreasonably) when the next Avengers movie comes out. They always do.
To be fair, back in the early 2000s, you also had a flood of Star Wars content. Loads of new games, novels, comics, action figures, the only thing missing was a TV presence, which TCW and the 2003 Clone Wars show shored up.
There was a hell of a lot of stuff back then. Some of it was good, some of it wasn't. I will say George was smart to only put out a Genndy Wars cartoon and no other TV shows, just to fill in the gap between AOTC and ROTS without oversaturating it. There only being 3 movies released between 1999-2005 also prevented major fatigue from setting in, even with the overexposure the franchise had from the EU content.
 
In the comics Thanos is nowhere near the final boss of anything, but if they want to build up an event on that scale ever again, they'd have to spend another decade doing it. There are the likes of Doom, Galactus, Kang, the Skrulls, etc in the comics. Normies don't understand how all of the stuff the MCU spent fucking up adapting took decades to build up in the comics, not ten years. Movies aren't comic books, I get that.
People may hate the M-She-U now but they're gonna be hyping themselves up (unreasonably) when the next Avengers movie comes out. They always do.
the MCU has pretty much it's own continuity (there's probably a multiverse designation for the nerds, but in the end it doesn't really matter), that's why it worked. normies didn't need to know who those characters were, and they each got their own stories and arcs etc.

as for avengers, a crossover only works if it brings all the individual heroes together people actually give a shit about. someone might think tony stark is a twat, but it has cap in it so he's gonna watch it. phase 4 so far has absolute no one going soyface over it's current lineup, no one is gonna go see a movie about not!captain america, black wunderkind not!ironman, female thor, she hulk, the eternals, or whatever the fuck current black panther is supposed to be.
worse, I think they didn't even set up an overarching villain at this point, at least I didn't hear about it or people speculating. the former 10 years of MCU which ended with endgame go all the way back to the very first movies, where endgame wasn't even a glimmer in feige's brain.

MCU can do a higher saturatation because the stories are modular, and while there are the big "collaborative" events you don't need to watch the Thor movies to follow the Captain America movies, or get what's going on with Avengers. But even then, since Capeshit is the new Wrestling move, audiences are tiring. Its a completely decentralized narrative where you generally only have to care about the part you like (or the events are so major you can't help but hear about them) even as they encourage you engage in ancillary media.

This doesn't work with Star Wars. Star Wars is an extremely centralized strong-character & event driven narrative (a space opera) with more thought put into the world building in places than it deserves, which gives the option of side stories. You can write a shitty spiderman story line or have a She-Hulk story line where Skrulls invade L.A. and it doesn't really affect any of the other stories. You write a shitty central narrative story, and you have now poisoned the well and killed all the side stories.

Disney didn't get this.
it would work fine with star wars, if the people in charge and especially the "fans" would fucking stop wanking themselves raw over MUH SKYWALKERS and MUH VADER. "everybody knows or is a skywalker" was always retarded when it comes to star wars, at some point their stories are over and done and people need to move the fuck on - which would also be easy enough to do if the whole "passing the torch" is done properly, which they completely blew. there was plenty of room to set up their own MCU leading all the way to the central movies (it's a whole fucking galaxy far far away after all), which they also blew, which is even more baffling considering they had the perfect layout how to do it in the MCU.

this is among the main reason why KK utterly sucks at her job, besides greenlighting shit movies and meddling them into trash. literally all she had to do was do the MCU with a star wars veneer, and people would've eaten it the fuck up. do a side movie or two with new characters setting up the new era, maybe even go all out with books, series, whatever, but THEN save the good shit for the big next episode where suddenly luke and the bunch shows up, self-contained enough so people can jump in there, while giving a nod to the people who watched all the stuff so far. it's not rocket science. just imagine andor happening BEFORE TFA.

As for what kills TFA for me? It'd probably be when they just have Rey perfectly do a mind trick without any training whatsoever because Episode 4 did that. It was so bad that even in the theater I went "what the actual fuck is that". That and the ADHD pacing were stuff even back in 2014 I noticed.

Though in retrospect it had to also be how choppy the first act was to save Oscar Isaac from becoming this gen's Sean Bean and Finn whooping as he slaughters his friends. That realization came about after around Ragu One and TLJ. TFA is a film that rapidly gets worse each time you think back to it. It's like a hoopty car about to die that is given fresh cosmetic work.
the worst most of the ADHD pacing is that it's so manic the actual "quiet" parts feel boring and tedious. usually the quiet parts are there to give the story and viewers some breathing room, but when jarjar does it it's more like someone shut down the music at a party.
fuck, if you do it at least go full transforms and bombard the viewer with 2+ hours of junkyards having sex, at least after half the movie you're so desensitized you can just enjoy the explosions and colors like a noise marine. that's why bay will always be a better spectacle director (I mean just look at pearl harbor, as ridiculous at it is, but on a technical and workmanship level it works great).

granted I might notice it more since I tend to watch stuff twice or even three times, and TFA is one of the few movies I couldn't even finish a second time. I think I fell asleep, then turned it off with the feeling I'm not really missing anything and rather do something else.
 
@ZMOT
it would work fine with star wars, if the people in charge and especially the "fans" would fucking stop wanking themselves raw over MUH SKYWALKERS and MUH VADER. "everybody knows or is a skywalker" was always retarded when it comes to star wars, at some point their stories are over and done and people need to move the fuck on - which would also be easy enough to do if the whole "passing the torch" is done properly, which they completely blew. there was plenty of room to set up their own MCU leading all the way to the central movies (it's a whole fucking galaxy far far away after all), which they also blew, which is even more baffling considering they had the perfect layout how to do it in the MCU.

The issue is that you can have X-men doing shit in Antarctica or in space with fighting off the Skulls on the moon or w/e and have spider man thwipping bad guys in New York and these are two completely separate narratives. Spiderman's adventures aren't about big world-changing events. the X-men are about being an allegory for race and mostly about fighting evil mutants and generally keeping things on the downlow; if events do explode into public consciousness, its usually in everyone's best interests to keep them underwraps.
Marvel is about establishing an iconic setting, and then maintaining a status quo that you slowly shift at glaciers pace.

Star Wars on the other hand is about a war in space. Its space opera, everything is over sized and BIG. The fact Lucas is involved means there is an Arc planned out, and everything needs to follow that arc. Now, there is plenty of space for side stories, but everyone needs to be on the same page about the big events. Status Quoing is the exact opposite of what Star Wars should be.

Now this lends itself to a "Everyone knows a skywalker" but that's because writers are lazy and fishing for memberries. Everyone should be reacting the Death Star, but not everyone needs to be getting the death star plans. Its the same problem with RotJ saying "Last of the jedi will you be.... except for the approximated 9 trillion that are still alive and have been jacking it anime for the past two decades *dies*". You don't need to put a jedi in every story, but they do.
 
Counter Point: We get how much MCU shit?

Its less Star Wars fatigue and more about the content being shit.
That and (along with the other reasons you stated) there's no fucking payoff. Why invest time watching anything disney when you know its all going to end horribly with the only direction for the future being that everyone is going to get humiliated, destroyed, cucked, trooned or fagged unless they're Daisy "Charismatic" Ridley's godawful character and her assortment of equally obnoxious friends. All your favorites will get fucked, doesn't matter who they are, even in between stories no longer work as Book of Bob proved, and nostalgiabait and poorly executed McQuarrie homages can only get you so far now.

Even Disneyfags have little to look forward to as Disney is even willing to shit on their own new creations or (in Filoni's OCs case) keep them in a perpetual state of status quo, as seen with how Disney has dealt with some of their new characters whose names I don't even care to remember and even raped the nucontinuity further, or the garbage assortment of games coming, or the fact that even Andor's fate is already known and, unlike the character who he is clearly an expy of, has no future or character progression to look forward to and all his achievements will be worthless because the New Republic will be a fucking atrocious troon-infested mess that gets destroyed by an even more powerful knockoff of the Empire run by an uglier Emperor who (has been confirmed by Disney) to never ever be able to fucking die and will keep coming back until the end of time unlike his Dark Empire counterpart to destroy planets with more Death Star/Starkiller knockoffs until the whole galaxy is just another big black void in space.

Best thing disney executives can do is realize they fucked up, stop spamming SW everywhere like its some lifestyle brand and either lock it in their vault or sell it to someone else who will only use it to make clothes, costumes and/or shitty toys and nothing else instead of spamming new media and ads everywhere and every second and hope that people forget these last 10 years of moronic media and godawful behavior on Disney, Horn, Hidalgo, RJ, JJ and Kennedy's parts, and only remember the pre-disney years. Even the fan communities these days aren't worth investing time in, either being just a bunch of vapid generic disney/MCU fans, Momdalorians and Ahsoka coomers.
Didn't they already introduce multiverse and time travel fuckery with Rebels? That would actually be good if some SWEU fan bought Disney in the future. At this point, if I got control of Disney, I'd just use that and have Din Djarin go through a time portal and stab Palpatine on Exogol, and have that cause a butterfly effect that leads to the events of the Thrawn Trilogy, the Dark Empire comics, the Crimson Empire comics, and the Jedi Knight games happening.
Using time travel and multiverse bullshit as narrative scapegoats for when your story has hit a fucking proverbial wall created from the shortsightedness and selfish wants of a multimillion dollar corporation as if said story were your average dust-collecting capeshit is the worst fucking way to use those concepts, especially when its introduced solely to save a wolfboy coomer's waifu and never brought up again (wouldn't be surprised if the MCU does this soon enough and follows the comics' examples with how convoluted their retarded overarching story is getting); and if some massively rich autist does buy Disney or Lucasfilm in the future, why the devil should they prioritize Disney's shit as the main timeline or even humor the existence of their godawful garbage with acknowledgement by using said scapegoat mechanic? Especially when the new theoretical owner can just as easily do what Disney did to George and his writers and just ignore Disney's trash and start over with a new continuity or a return to the old not run by self-absorbed retards, wokeists, Spielberg kiddies, and a clone-obsessed wolfaboo hack with orange fever that only appeals to battered fans with a wookieepedo and orange jailbait fetish. inb4 "but muh based Darktrooper knockoffs beating up some rando mandos was heckin based and single handedly saved Disney Wars!"
 
Last edited:
her assortment of equally obnoxious friends

Who are they?

Both of her companions were merciless drawn through the mud.

John Boyega's character was turned from a heel face turn poised to be force sensitive and a heroic character to a bumbling buffoon comedy relief bordering on racial caricature within a single movie.

He was hinted to rival Kylo as Rey's love interest but this wasn't only scraped, he was repeatedly cockblocked in a rather humiliating way. There was an exchange in Rise of Skywalker that is meant to be understood this way and it sticks sorely.

Especially when he was unceremoniously paired with the asian girl IIRC in a manner that sounds like they wanted to get rid quickly of ethnic minority characters. Interestingly enough, Finn's demotion is 100% linked to negative reactions from mainland chinese audiences.

Ironic, isn't it? They would obsessively focus and obsess with a minority sector of the (ostensibly) white Star Wars fandom that had expressed racist views towards Finn, and they would do everything to piss them off to the point that they came off as people whose only interest was sticking it to that sector instead of making Star Wars movies, but as long as Xi Jingping disapproval of black people kicked in they would eviscerate their flagship black character. And then, they pair it with an asian girl. These people don't know what they're doing. They're just vindictive assholes with no clear goal, sense of business self preservation or even an agenda based on strongly held beliefs.

No wonder why Boyega is bitter to this day about the whole Star Wars experience.

The other character, the one played by Oscar Isaacs, was supposed to die in TFA. He didn't and they didn't knew what to do with him, so Rian Johnson turned him into the poster child of toxic masculinity white supremacy privilege whatever, even though 1) He's played by a tanned latino guy and 2) he's mostly perfectly reasonable and Johnson pulls a Willis in the sense of trying to make a villain of a guy who sounds reasonable, and making in turn the people he wanted to come off as heroes sound like incompetent turds.

This guy is basically sideshow Mel by Rise of Skywalker.

So, can anyone illustrate me about which character apart from Rey (and possibly Leia) was not completely humiliated, turned into a caricature, demoted, mistreated or demolished? I can't think of no one, from the white supremacist Weasley to Han Solo, to Finn, to Poe, to the big fucking villain Snoke to even fucking Yoda and "Evil grandpa" Palpatine. All of them. None of them matter. Hero or villain, new or old. They're all turned into clowns.
 
The Oscar Isaac character was really the only likeable new character they came up with but as said above they decided to use him as the white man whipping boy and muck up whatever arc he had left. Even so far as to destroy any chance of creating the new "big three".

I did not watch the last film, but I remember seeing the clips where they so pathetically tried to convince us the new characters were lifelong friends, it was horrible. I also always thought how laughably bad it was in TLJ where they forgot Rey and Isaac's character had already met!

We have all said it so much we actually sometimes forget just how poorly made and how awful those three films were.
 
And yes, people did get Star Wars fatigue back in the day

No, they didn't.

Episode III was very hyped, everybody was really excited about it even if they weren't thrilled by EI and EII. The common feeling is that they were very hyped to Palpatine's rise to power and Anakin's downfall and they were wondering how it would happen since the plot had been following a glacial pace and only really started taking speed at the literal 5 last minutes of Attack of the Clones.

All the material that came up between EII and EIII, especially Tartakovski's Star Wars, was scratching that itch. People absolutely didn't get fatigue. At least not until Episode III was released, after which the franchise went dormant.
 
No, they didn't.

Episode III was very hyped, everybody was really excited about it even if they weren't thrilled by EI and EII. The common feeling is that they were very hyped to Palpatine's rise to power and Anakin's downfall and they were wondering how it would happen since the plot had been following a glacial pace and only really started taking speed at the literal 5 last minutes of Attack of the Clones.

All the material that came up between EII and EIII, especially Tartakovski's Star Wars, was scratching that itch. People absolutely didn't get fatigue. At least not until Episode III was released, after which the franchise went dormant.

What he said. Back in 2005, when Ep III was leading up to release, it was practically fever pitch. It was the first time I ever felt that charge of anticipation in the air for a movie. Don't know about LOTR fans, but Ep. III also made history for us teens as the movie where "evil legit won." There was no coming back from this because the OT is the one where hope and a happy ending would be. This one is where everything would crash and burn, from a narrative standpoint.

And it didn't disappoint. I skipped school twice with different friends to see it on two separate occasions after the outing with my family. It was the first film I also watched solo with friends. I'll never forget those moments.
 
Pepper your anuses, boys...the new Empire covers for Indy 500 are already alluding to all the dimensional hopping/time travel that was alluded to in early production rumors.

empire-magazine-subscriber-cover-indiana-jones-5.jpeg

I don't, because that argument never made sense. "there was no foundation" - so what?
Because you can't make sequels out of narrative scorched earth.

Luke's New Jedi Order being entirely killed off-screen, Han and Leia's marriage falling into ruins before the film even started, the New Republic being yeeted without a fight, and the new conflict being a farcical "bigger is better" retread of the Empire vs Rebels right down to the aesthetic, starships, weapons and battle tactics is the literal definition of scorched earth.

When the start of your "sequels" is to snap all narrative progression clean in half, and artificially strong-arm the setting back to square one of the Original Trilogy, you've already created a blight on the timeline that can never be undone without hamfisted retconning or time travel. Which Episode 8 and 9 were never going to do--if nothing else because it would be a public admission of defeat on behalf of Disney/LFL's producers, which they most certainly weren't going to do in that early period when they were still trying to fuel the freshly-minted post-2012 narrative that they were "saving Star Wars" from Mean Old George and his Yucky Prequels.

People can reee all they like about fans "being to harsh on Jar Jar's films when Rian ruined everything", but at the end of the day, 99% of the ST's problems started with him, not Rian. And let's be frank, the only people bending over backwards to play devil's advocate for Jar Jar Abrams are the ones that sang his praises around TFA's announcement....and now look hopelessly stupid now that the trilogy is over, and their red-faced defense of Abrams' retarded nostalgiabait and mystery boxes didn't pay off.

The other problem is Star Wars fatigue. Every other minute we get new Star Wars announced. New shows, movies, cartoons. None of it quality. Meanwhile HBO cancels a show of its cash cow series Game of Thrones because of a poor pilot (that was supposedly the most expensive pilot they had ever done). Even hardcore Star Wars fans can barely keep up with the amount of content. Do Star Wars fans have lives beyond their franchise?

Star Wars is like a lifestyle brand at this point. You either make it your entire life or you ignore it. Even if everything Disney did with Star Wars was like Godfather 1&2 quality the sheer amount of content is still too much for most to consume. Who even has the time to be a Star Wars fan anymore except for people with no lives? Being a Star Wars fan is like a full time career.
The phenomenon is very similar to the comics craze of the 90's. Both Marvel and DC were going overload with the amount of crossovers and events, to the point where there were so many titles to keep up with in any given month--not year, but month--that it became near-impossible to keep up with.

It's the process of suffocating your audience with content. And when you produce it at that grueling speed, something's going to be compromised...and that "something" is often the quality. Hence why a lot of the 90's comics of the age like Maximum Carnage, Operation Galactic Storm, The Clone Saga, and the 800 interchangeable X-Men crossovers of the day have aged like milk.

Good art, sure. Great even, in some cases. But good luck recalling what the fucking story was in that bloated mess of end-of-the-world battles and convoluted villain machinations.

No, they didn't.

Episode III was very hyped, everybody was really excited about it even if they weren't thrilled by EI and EII. The common feeling is that they were very hyped to Palpatine's rise to power and Anakin's downfall and they were wondering how it would happen since the plot had been following a glacial pace and only really started taking speed at the literal 5 last minutes of Attack of the Clones.

All the material that came up between EII and EIII, especially Tartakovski's Star Wars, was scratching that itch. People absolutely didn't get fatigue. At least not until Episode III was released, after which the franchise went dormant.
Hell, I still remember when those SWTOR Cinematic Trailers were coming out, and people at my high school--most of which had long renounced Star Wars as "gay kid shit" now that they were teenagers--were huddling around their phones drooling over stuff like the Malgus vs Satele fight. And that was well into the 2010's.

People don't get fatigued from cool shit, because cool shit never gets old. They get fatigued by low-effort interchangeable simulacra...which is all Disney makes these days.
 
Spiderman's adventures aren't about big world-changing events.
Until the MCU decided that Iron Boy should be saving the world/universe and punching aliens in outer space every fucking movie. Spidey as a character clearly works as a main protagonist and putting him in the Avengers movies just kind of turned him into another side character there to support Tony's arc, which was an aspect I hated. Maybe after NWH he'll actually be forced to stand on his own for once. But I digress.
the X-men are about being an allegory for race
Correct me if I'm wrong but X-Men being an allegory for something specific like race/sexuality was just woke revisionism made up decades later, kind of like how morons think Professor X is supposed to be MLK and Magneto is supposed to be Malcom X.
Star Wars on the other hand is about a war in space. Its space opera, everything is over sized and BIG. The fact Lucas is involved means there is an Arc planned out, and everything needs to follow that arc. Now, there is plenty of space for side stories, but everyone needs to be on the same page about the big events. Status Quoing is the exact opposite of what Star Wars should be.

Now this lends itself to a "Everyone knows a skywalker" but that's because writers are lazy and fishing for memberries. Everyone should be reacting the Death Star, but not everyone needs to be getting the death star plans. Its the same problem with RotJ saying "Last of the jedi will you be.... except for the approximated 9 trillion that are still alive and have been jacking it anime for the past two decades *dies*". You don't need to put a jedi in every story, but they do.
Star Wars is about a lot of things and its meaning is different to a lot of people. I personally think the movies are supposed to be about the macro plot of the Empire vs the Rebels while also being about the characters, some of which happen to be Jedi or Skywalkers. The multimedia content (books, games) thrived on being about other characters and settings within the SW galaxy, which I don't have a problem with. I agree with you about everything else though.
No, they didn't.

Episode III was very hyped, everybody was really excited about it even if they weren't thrilled by EI and EII. The common feeling is that they were very hyped to Palpatine's rise to power and Anakin's downfall and they were wondering how it would happen since the plot had been following a glacial pace and only really started taking speed at the literal 5 last minutes of Attack of the Clones.

All the material that came up between EII and EIII, especially Tartakovski's Star Wars, was scratching that itch. People absolutely didn't get fatigue. At least not until Episode III was released, after which the franchise went dormant.
imo fatigue on the movie side didn't happen because Star Wars wasn't pretending to be the MCU back then, attempting to shit out movies every year forever. They knew the power of withholding things the audience wants from them until the time was right. The movies are the flagship. Just like with the OT since normies don't give a shit about the expanded universe it was relativity quiet until a new movie came out. It's the reason why TFA made as much as it did. There were no movies for 10 years, even with the stream of EU crap coming out.
Andor being a success/failure would mean nothing for the quality of future Star Wars whether you like it or not, at the very best it would decide if the aesthetic of future cash grabs will have 'serious business' vomited on it.
This, it's exactly why the message Disney got from Mando's success was just greenlighting any half assed D+ show pitch they could think of instead of focusing on telling good stories.

@Mississippi Motorboater
Because you can't make sequels out of narrative scorched earth.
Imagine trying to build a large skyscraper with no blueprint. The building on the plot of land prior has been completely demolished. The lower levels/foundation make zero fucking sense and half of it is just lazily copying something else with the misguided expectation that someone else will fill in the gaps later. Basically, it's unfinished.

There's also an unrealistic timeline for the project because of shareholders wanting to make money. For some reason most people think this is okay. Then they just pass off the next phase of the building in its current state to someone else and tell them to do whatever they want.

What is the likelihood the skyscraper won't collapse and fall to the ground as a pile of rubble?

@ZMOT
the worst most of the ADHD pacing is that it's so manic the actual "quiet" parts feel boring and tedious. usually the quiet parts are there to give the story and viewers some breathing room, but when jarjar does it it's more like someone shut down the music at a party.
That's a good way of putting it. Quiet "slow" moments are necessary for Star Wars, something JJ didn't understand. JJ's "competent" directing is totally incongruent with Episodes 1 - 6 because he was too busy trying to ape Spielberg and have the movie move so fast you barely have time to think about it. When TFA slows down during the second act it gets boring. Another thing is that JJ and Rian's filmmaking styles are so radically different from one another that TFA and TLJ barely feel like sequels to each other.
 
No, they didn't.

Episode III was very hyped, everybody was really excited about it even if they weren't thrilled by EI and EII. The common feeling is that they were very hyped to Palpatine's rise to power and Anakin's downfall and they were wondering how it would happen since the plot had been following a glacial pace and only really started taking speed at the literal 5 last minutes of Attack of the Clones.

All the material that came up between EII and EIII, especially Tartakovski's Star Wars, was scratching that itch. People absolutely didn't get fatigue. At least not until Episode III was released, after which the franchise went dormant.
I was talking about AFTER 2005. And no, the franchise did not go dormant after that. Loads of books, comics, and games followed in EP3's release. Read my comment again. The book fandom got fatigued by the time of the Vong saga or LOTF, the KOTOR fandom got fatigued by the time of SWTOR, and as fans started to walk away, the franchise declined before it was bought by the Mouse and reset.

@Mississippi Motorboater
You can talk about how cool the SWTOR trailers are, but speaking as a fan of SWTOR, many KOTOR fans denounced it and it even got the derisive name of "TORtanic". Those who didn't scream in terror over what happened to Revan and the Exile were bored at the fact that the game turned out to be another WoW clone with a story. It's a pretty fun story on its own merits, but the target demographic for the game, the KOTOR fanbase, left in disgust. Only a few stuck around to enjoy what was there, including yours truly. But there was no shortage of people who either denounced Revan's end in SWTOR, or denounced the game entirely. And even those who didn't give two rips about the story didn't like the WoW-style gameplay that much either.
 
Last edited:
the game turned out to be another WoW clone with a story

I've said it before and I'll say it again, if SWTOR had been single player it would have been regarded as a return to form for the KOTOR series. It isn't like KOTOR wasn't already halfway to WoW style gameplay, so all that would have been said about it would have been "dated gameplay, but WOW that story". This goes double if they had just focused on the two protagonist roles, Knight and Agent. Or if they'd not gone WoW clone and instead went with something more like... I don't know, even Borderlands clone would have been a serious step up. Warframe clone, maybe. Nothing makes me sadder than wasted potential.

Hey, fun fact, SWTOR is the only """legends""" EU thing Disney still publishes afaik. Somehow it manages to be less terrible than the mainline canon the rat excretes.
 
I've said it before and I'll say it again, if SWTOR had been single player it would have been regarded as a return to form for the KOTOR series. It isn't like KOTOR wasn't already halfway to WoW style gameplay, so all that would have been said about it would have been "dated gameplay, but WOW that story". This goes double if they had just focused on the two protagonist roles, Knight and Agent. Or if they'd not gone WoW clone and instead went with something more like... I don't know, even Borderlands clone would have been a serious step up. Warframe clone, maybe. Nothing makes me sadder than wasted potential.
That's the thing. If they made it a single-player game with a multiplayer side, like Mass Effect 3, then SWTOR would've been widely successful. Especially if you released it on consoles. Combine that with changing the fates of Revan and the Exile to not be a waste of time, and you'd get 2011's game of the year right there.

It's just that EA wanted to suck you bone-dry with MMO subscriptions, and the gameplay turned out to be just WoW with a Star Wars paintjob, and all the lore nuts were horrified at how they treated Revan and the Exile, and we get the reaction SWTOR got: it was considered OK at best by some fans, while other fans saw it as sacrilege. Most of the KOTOR fanbase, which was SWTOR's main target demographic, did not like it. I remember back in the day when many KOTOR fans would not shut up about how much of a travesty SWTOR was, even though as a KOTOR fan, I still enjoyed SWTOR a lot, mainly because I loved the True Sith Empire, and I think the Republic and the Jedi in the SWTOR era are far less screwed up than in the Prequels, so that's a point in their favor.

I'd say out of all the stories, SWTOR's Sith Empire stories shone the best. Either you were a good person trying to keep your integrity in a society full of degenerates, or you're Space Littlefinger, trying to claw your way up to the top. The Agent and Inquisitor storylines certainly felt like the latter, although they could still be more like the former if you go Light Side with them. The Republic stories weren't as compelling, outside of maybe the Consular story where you were dealing with Force-related mysteries like some Force Plague or the Children of the Emperor. The Smuggler story is just comedy, the Trooper story was just........adequate, and the Jedi Knight story felt rather forced. How in the hell does some random Jedi succeed where Revan failed? They even show later how powerful Revan was, to the point where Satele Shan and Darth Marr had to work together against him, and yet, he failed while some random Jedi Knight succeeded against the Sith Emperor? It felt rather forced.

At least the Sith Warrior is a powerhouse for a reason; trained since birth to be a killing machine, the scion of a powerful Sith bloodline, and your final boss is still just some Sith Lord who's on the Dark Council. Meanwhile, some random Jedi Knight who came out of nowhere saves the galaxy from destruction and slays a foe that the mighty Darth Revan couldn't defeat.

Hey, fun fact, SWTOR is the only """legends""" EU thing Disney still publishes afaik. Somehow it manages to be less terrible than the mainline canon the rat excretes.
No shit. In the land of the boring, what was once considered to be medium-tier is considered top-tier. Just look at the Mandalorian. In the old EU days, it'd just be another story. Now? It's their version of the MCU. But I haven't heard anything substantial from the SWTOR story recently, and it seemed like the story really should've just ended with the death of old man Valkorion/Vitiate. They should've just signed another Treaty of Coruscant, then have the Sith Empire fall apart due to infighting, 1700 years later. Then have that be the setting for the rise of Darth Ruin and the New Sith Empire.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RiceofSkywalker
The Agent and Inquisitor storylines certainly felt like the latter, although they could still be more like the former if you go Light Side with them.

The only way to play the game is counter-alignment. Dark side Knight is Anakin Skywalker as voiced by Solid Snake, Trooper is a violent meathead thug. Light side Sith is hilarious, with Inquisitor ending up as the funniest fascist in the empire and Warrior being MILF Hunter on the prowl.

Then have that be the setting for the rise of Darth Ruin and the New Sith Empire.

Can you imagine if SWTOR had the balls to take you all the way to Rusaan? Even as just a little dungeon thing, a flash-forward.
 
The only way to play the game is counter-alignment. Dark side Knight is Anakin Skywalker as voiced by Solid Snake, Trooper is a violent meathead thug. Light side Sith is hilarious, with Inquisitor ending up as the funniest fascist in the empire and Warrior being MILF Hunter on the prowl.
Yep. Dark Side Republic characters are hilarious because you're essentially Homelander at that point: a violent, narcissistic sociopath that society worships as the savior of the world.

Can you imagine if SWTOR had the balls to take you all the way to Rusaan? Even as just a little dungeon thing, a flash-forward.
Exactly. Or have it as SWTOR Part 2 and have you create a brand-new character who participates in the New Sith Wars.
 
Yep. Dark Side Republic characters are hilarious because you're essentially Homelander at that point: a violent, narcissistic sociopath that society worships as the savior of the world.

I prefer light side Empire ones, since the game still has "evil is kicking puppies" syndrome to an extent. When you're light side bad guy you're just acting like a rational human being in the face of a sea of cenobite retards. When you're dark side good guy more often than not you're the only cenobite in the room.

Exactly. Or have it as SWTOR Part 2 and have you create a brand-new character who participates in the New Sith Wars.

I've always been fascinated by the Republic Dark Age era. It seems like such an interesting era to set media, and yet only that one weird comic is there.
 
I prefer light side Empire ones, since the game still has "evil is kicking puppies" syndrome to an extent. When you're light side bad guy you're just acting like a rational human being in the face of a sea of cenobite retards. When you're dark side good guy more often than not you're the only cenobite in the room.
Indeed. Keeping yourself to the Light while drowning in a sea of darkness is compelling in SWTOR's Empire storylines. Meanwhile, Republic characters that go Dark Side are barely slapped on the wrist for their crimes and are still seen as heroes, which is why I made that Homelander comparison. There's that one part of the Trooper storyline where you can gun down a senator, and instead of getting drummed out of the service or thrown in jail, you're allowed to remain free killing whoever you feel like killing. Geez. At least if the Agent burns bridges with the Empire by keeping the Black Codex or giving it to the Republic, they have to hide and disappear. The Trooper gets away with killing a senator as if they just stepped on some dog poop and got mildly annoyed by it.

I've always been fascinated by the Republic Dark Age era. It seems like such an interesting era to set media, and yet only that one weird comic is there.
That, and the Darth Bane books. And it's a rich historical era. The Sith playing a near-eternal game of thrones, the Republic reduced to a rump state around Coruscant (not unlike Byzantium in 1450), some Jedi even went warlord and became hereditary overlords over certain sectors. And technological progress as a whole got stifled. It's Star Wars' version of Warhammer 40K, aside from the Pius Dea Crusades.
 
Last edited:
1668901181277.png
1668901575116.png
Not Star Wars related but here are the first images of Harrison Ford in Indiana Jones 5. My guess is Disney is gonna put the first trailer out with Avatar next month.
Two things:
  1. Who the hell wants to see Harrison sleepwalk through another performance as another legacy character he played in the 80s? Did we learn NOTHING from the sequel trilogy?
  2. The "Indiana Jones but old" bit was done already in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, and that movie was 15 years ago. Geriatric Indy is just fucking embarrassing, just like geriatric Han Solo.
 
Back