𝕏 / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

erlang is for ultra distributed systems and mega concurrency
webdevs who use ruby and js avoid such difficult things like the plague
That's what makes it ideal for something like mastodon (or at least something like it). To handle twitter-level traffic, a healthy mastodon network needs to be able to handle massive concurrency and distributed operation. The fact that it gatekeeps webshits is a major bonus.

Hmmm... I'm actually kinda tempted to give it a try, if for no other reason than to keep my Erlang/Elixir skills from getting rusty. I haven't had a chance to use them for production work in quite awhile.

ETA:
The instant one of those turns into a vulnerability we're going to be in for a mountain of salt.
Yeah, that's going to be hilarious. To its credit, Ruby on Rails has been around for a long damned time (about 15 years -- very good longevity for a webshit project) so I imagine the core itself is pretty robust by now. But mastodon itself (as a project, a specification and an implementation) ... not so much. Maybe what, six or seven years? And it's never been a massively popular system (which -- importantly -- doesn't upset its contributors since they mostly preferred it to be a twitter alternative that didn't attract much external attention).

It's obvious already that performance is a massive issue (RoR has never been fast to begin with, and I have no doubt anything the mastodon lads have built greenfield has performance issues too because people very rarely include performance at the conceptual and proof-of-concept stages; and we all know how frequently "proof-of-concept" becomes "production").

RoR isn't designed (or intended) for horizontal scaling, though like most other webshit platforms it's not designed in a way that precludes it -- you can generally slap a load balancer in front of a handful of identically-configured servers to grow capacity in a (mostly) linear fashion, but that's expensive and not really too cost-effective and eventually you'll still hit a database bottleneck anyway.

Performance won't be an easy problem for them to fix without a rewrite using something better than RoR. DDoS is a massive risk for sure. Security concerns are going to be more entertaining in the long run though. There's gotta be something. I doubt they're doing any fuzz testing and haven't asked any competent third parties to perform an audit.

Exciting times ahead for sure!
 
Last edited:
The NY Times' hateboner for Elon era Twitter is something to behold. Article after article all REEEEing in the same key. Maybe they have a point? 🤔

Edit: If anything WaPo is worse. Will have to check and see if I still have WSJ access now.

2nd edit: Added WSJ screenie. A bit more of a mixed bag than the other two, but mostly the same stuff. I was curious about media coverage, figured others might be interested. Hope this all is okay.

FireShot Capture 001 - The New York Times - Search - www.nytimes.com.png
edit-WaPo.png
Edit-WSJ-Twitter.png
x
 
Last edited:
The NY Times' hateboner for Elon era Twitter is something to behold. Article after article all REEEEing in the same key. Maybe they have a point?
The complete, hysterical meltdown of America's legacy media, over the change of ownership of a shitty blogging website, is a wonder of the modern age. Why do they care?
 
And the shit talking that yes, people have to work at twitter, continues.

ShitTalkingElon.PNG

It like no one in Silicon Valley has been asked by the boss "What did you do this week?"

I really hope it turns out that Musk just doubled the pay of everyone that stayed beyond after firing close to 70% (or more) of the work force.
 
Lost means of propaganda
Because literally 90% of all "news" for the past decade has just been "reporting" shit that was said on Twitter. For some websites, mostly pop culture related ones, it is 100%, but even for "legitimate" outlets like NYT and CNN it is their primary source for everything. They were able to cut staffs and have retards and interns write their articles because all they had to do was put a few transitions and connective sentences between Tweets. And because Twitter was allied, all the info they reported from it was already verified and scrubbed. Now, since Twitter is dirty again, it had reverted to being a source just like any other.

Journoshits will actually have to do work now, and companies will have to pay for them to do it. Or I should say would have to. Since they're not going to actually do that. They'll bitch about Twitter for a few weeks, and then go right back to doing what they were doing, only possibly with some sort of trigger warning or lawyer speak at the beginning/end of every "article" about how Twitter is now unverified information and the news outlet is just reporting what was posted and they are totally not responsible for the info they are reporting on.

It's basically like taking scanners away from grocery store checkout counters and going back to making the cashiers type in all the prices by hand.
 
They'll bitch about Twitter for a few weeks, and then go right back to doing what they were doing, only possibly with some sort of trigger warning or lawyer speak at the beginning/end of every "article" about how Twitter is now unverified information and the news outlet is just reporting what was posted and they are totally not responsible for the info they are reporting on.
While I generally to hate it with all my heart and soul, nevertheless, the BBC has had that as a standard disclaimer next to any embedded content for years, especially on their "twitter said" stories. They've also not been that obsessive about the twitter takeover, possibly because they still employ actual journalists (biased and paternalist though they may be).
 
Powerlevel: I work in the tech sector. Every job I can recall included some sort of status report, almost always weekly. Nobody with experience in the tech sector would find this noteworthy.
The only slightly noteworthing thing is it's going all the way up to Waternoose as it were.

My guess is 99% goes dumped into a big old gmail folder (twitter uses google apps for lame domains lol) and he dredges from it if necessary. A big part of post-Elon twitter is going to be moving engineers to where they're best used. There's real "janitor promoted to head of security" possibilities in a big shakeup like this, and if you have people who can recognize talent it can be v. valuable.
 
Powerlevel: I work in the tech sector. Every job I can recall included some sort of status report, almost always weekly. Nobody with experience in the tech sector would find this noteworthy.
Ha ha, yeah, so do I. It just funny to see how much is being reported as "MUSK IS DOING SOMETHING CRAAAAAAAZZZZZZZZYYYYYYYY" from the non tech people in tech companies. DEI people at its finest.
 
Powerlevel: I work in the tech sector. Every job I can recall included some sort of status report, almost always weekly. Nobody with experience in the tech sector would find this noteworthy.
Can confirm. One job it was always weekly, and it was mostly related to the coding of the website and the software the company was using for payroll/accounting/sales/etc... which the latter was a team effort between the company that owned the software and the two coders that were banging their heads against the wall because they kept finding mistakes in the company's code that they had to fix so it was like our company was building their software for them. Only time i was really needed for those meetings was if they had some big project they were rolling out (i.e. Win7 to Win10 migrations, company phone upgrades while taking inventory of the old phons, finding a recycler to destroy the bajillion faulty hard-drives they had in boxes for a good price, etc...)

Another job i was at only had one BIG quarterly one, and they decided to do it after 5pm when everyone in the office left, and it dragged on to like 9, almost 10pm, mainly because the IT supervisor i guess just liked to hear the sound of his own voice (one of those people that can stretch something short to novel lengths).
 
And the shit talking that yes, people have to work at twitter, continues.

View attachment 3913545

It like no one in Silicon Valley has been asked by the boss "What did you do this week?"

I really hope it turns out that Musk just doubled the pay of everyone that stayed beyond after firing close to 70% (or more) of the work force.
Breaking news! Twitter employees now have to actually work!
 
Powerlevel: I work in the tech sector. Every job I can recall included some sort of status report, almost always weekly. Nobody with experience in the tech sector would find this noteworthy.
I would find it unusual for individual devs to be reporting directly to the CEO. It would at least go dev -> team leader -> CEO.
 
I love how progressives fall into the pre-modern (or really pre-civilizational) moral framework. You had an account on a server which previously used a script developed by someone associated with a bad guy, therefore you're contaminated. Will some cleansing ritual help them?
 
Back